Clarifying the rear support question a little further, you can even support 2 BG's each with 12 bases with a single BG of only 6 bases by having the supporting unit in a column straddling the line between the 2 supported BG's.
Cheers!
Jason
Search found 40 matches
- Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:29 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Alexander Army
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3859
- Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:25 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Alexander Army
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3859
- Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:54 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Alexander Army
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3859
Alexander Army
Hi all,
I am planning on participating in an 800-pt tournament, and I was hoping you might comment on this army:
C-in-C (Alexander)
1xIC
Sub-commanders
2xTC
Agema
1x4 Cv, Armored, Elite, Drilled, Lancers, Swordsmen
Companion Cavalry
1x4 Cv, Armored, Superior, Drilled, Lancers, Swordsmen ...
I am planning on participating in an 800-pt tournament, and I was hoping you might comment on this army:
C-in-C (Alexander)
1xIC
Sub-commanders
2xTC
Agema
1x4 Cv, Armored, Elite, Drilled, Lancers, Swordsmen
Companion Cavalry
1x4 Cv, Armored, Superior, Drilled, Lancers, Swordsmen ...
- Thu Oct 02, 2008 2:49 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: road & +1 MU rule???
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5634
road & +1 MU rule???
I'm confused with the rule regarding roads presented on p. 41. Specifically, it states...
"Troops in column move at +1 MU along roads or through any terrain if the indicated move distance is less than their move distance in open terrain."
Okay, so their are two ways to interpret the "or" in this ...
"Troops in column move at +1 MU along roads or through any terrain if the indicated move distance is less than their move distance in open terrain."
Okay, so their are two ways to interpret the "or" in this ...
- Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:53 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Artillery & Cohesion Tests
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2644
- Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:16 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Artillery & Cohesion Tests
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2644
- Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:46 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Artillery & Cohesion Tests
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2644
Artillery & Cohesion Tests
Suppose I have 4 light artillery shooting at a 8-base unit. I score 4 hits. Does this qualify for the "more than 1 reason to test" since I inflicted both 2 shooting hits from artillery & 1 HP3B?
If this is the case, then the modifier to the cohesion test for the above example would be an impressive ...
If this is the case, then the modifier to the cohesion test for the above example would be an impressive ...
- Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:05 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: QUICK PLAY REFERENCE SHEET
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7405
- Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:04 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: QUICK PLAY REFERENCE SHEET
- Replies: 23
- Views: 7405
- Fri May 30, 2008 4:40 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Ordonnance French...
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3259
- Fri May 23, 2008 6:20 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Mixed BG's & Front-rank Casualties
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1295
Mixed BG's & Front-rank Casualties
(I did a forum search and did not find the answer to the following:)
Suppose I have a Danish Select Levy (Mixed BG of Heavy Weapon & Crossbow/Swordsmen). And further suppose that in the front rank I also have a mix of troops.
When removing bases can I choose whether to remove a heavy weapon or ...
Suppose I have a Danish Select Levy (Mixed BG of Heavy Weapon & Crossbow/Swordsmen). And further suppose that in the front rank I also have a mix of troops.
When removing bases can I choose whether to remove a heavy weapon or ...
- Thu May 22, 2008 5:52 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Historical colours for Macedonians?
- Replies: 22
- Views: 48334
On the back of the "Immortal Fire" Army Companion book there is a picture of some very nicely painted miniatures including two units with the Macedonian star on their shields. One unit has blue helmets and blue shields and looks to be hypaspists. The other unit has red shields (and bronze helmets ...
- Mon May 19, 2008 5:15 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Using commander for cohesion test and combat...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3739
- Fri May 16, 2008 5:01 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Xyston Agema vs. Companions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2567
One of the Osprey books suggest that companions wore yellow cloaks with a lilac border whereas the elite unites (agema?) reversed that with lilac cloaks and a yellow border. So that is one way I suppose I could differentiate.
However, does anyone know if the jaguar saddle cloth was also a mark of ...
However, does anyone know if the jaguar saddle cloth was also a mark of ...
- Fri May 16, 2008 4:10 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Alexander's Artillery
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1255
Alexander's Artillery
Has anyone put Alexander's artillery to effective use? It seems to me that without field fortifications, one would have to devote a unit of infantry to protect it, and with only 2 Art available, it seems that not enough dice would be generated to make a real difference.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
- Fri May 16, 2008 4:06 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Xyston Agema vs. Companions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2567
Xyston Agema vs. Companions
Hi all,
I am soliciting ideas on how to differentiate between my BG of Alexander's Agema vs. the mounted Companions while using the Xyston miniatures.
One idea I had was to use the horses with the jaguar saddle blankets for the Agema and the ones with the cloth blankets for the companions. However ...
I am soliciting ideas on how to differentiate between my BG of Alexander's Agema vs. the mounted Companions while using the Xyston miniatures.
One idea I had was to use the horses with the jaguar saddle blankets for the Agema and the ones with the cloth blankets for the companions. However ...
- Thu May 15, 2008 4:10 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Sp rear supporting Pk (best practices?)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6064
Thanks Hammy for the picture to clarify how a 6 element BG can support 2 8 element BG's. My approach would have actually been simpler. Instead of having 2 files x 3 ranks (as you have drawn), I was considering 3 files x 2 ranks. Then I can have them facing directly forward and still support both 8 ...
- Wed May 14, 2008 8:03 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Sp rear supporting Pk (best practices?)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6064
- Wed May 14, 2008 6:45 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Sp rear supporting Pk (best practices?)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6064
- Wed May 14, 2008 5:57 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Sp rear supporting Pk (best practices?)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6064
Sp rear supporting Pk (best practices?)
Hi all!
Question #1:
I want to rear support my 2 BG's of 8 Pk with my 1 BG of 6 Sp.
I also want to avoid loss of cohesion to the Sp if the Pk rout.
I know I can easily do this if I keep the 6 Sp in a column, but is there a way to do it having the Sp with a frontage of 3? I know I can rear ...
Question #1:
I want to rear support my 2 BG's of 8 Pk with my 1 BG of 6 Sp.
I also want to avoid loss of cohesion to the Sp if the Pk rout.
I know I can easily do this if I keep the 6 Sp in a column, but is there a way to do it having the Sp with a frontage of 3? I know I can rear ...