Search found 51 matches

by switze01
Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:56 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Light horse evade
Replies: 4
Views: 1755

Light horse evade

Hi Played a game on Tuesday when lh had to evad through cavalry ll ccc l = light horse c =cav Even thought they moved 1 base to the right they couldn't avoid the cav Now this means they burst through and disorder the cav Is this correct and if so if make it difficult to deploy the horse as skirmishe...
by switze01
Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:52 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Joining an existing combat
Replies: 6
Views: 2165

Re: Joining an existing combat

Hi

Think I got my ideas confused reference this.
I got the idea that you couldn't charge into a unit already in melee DOH
So in fact you can or you can move into an overlap
during manoeuvre

Thx

Steve
by switze01
Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:39 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Joining an existing combat
Replies: 6
Views: 2165

Re: Joining an existing combat

ar :arrow: aaaa
ar :arrow: ee
:arrow: :arrow: cc

Here is a better diag :arrow: is a space
by switze01
Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:37 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Joining an existing combat
Replies: 6
Views: 2165

Re: Joining an existing combat

Right so we did it correctly ...but in the combat I had 1 elephant and 1 aux facing each other initially while the other auxilia was back a bit and facing the other auxilia stand (auxila was one stand behind the other ) . Now will the other auxilia just join the melee during the manoeuvre phase or c...
by switze01
Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:35 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Joining an existing combat
Replies: 6
Views: 2165

Re: Joining an existing combat

Hi Just to clarify the editor of this has moved the rear auxilia it should be behind and to the right of the front auxilia with one of the elephant stands in front of it The cav original position was to the rear and the right as it couldn't reach to charge into the rear until a turn after the auxili...
by switze01
Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:32 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Joining an existing combat
Replies: 6
Views: 2165

Joining an existing combat

Hi Last night I had a situation like this aa aa ee cc a = roman auxilia e= Sassanid elephants c=roman cavalry Sassanid elephants are in contact with first roman auxilia and fighting a melee. The melee is then joined by the other roman auxilia we assumed the must join and the one on the end fights as...
by switze01
Mon Feb 11, 2013 12:30 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Killiecrankie bayonets
Replies: 4
Views: 1105

Killiecrankie bayonets

Hi The bayonet issue at killiecrankie needs a special rule to simulate the wiiliamite armies failure to get them fixed in time for the highland charge. My idea is - one fire phase to fix bayonets during which you cannot fire and after which you cannot fire. Once fixed you get the bayonet bonus - oth...
by switze01
Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:29 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Impact base alignment
Replies: 2
Views: 966

Impact base alignment

Hi All Last night in a game we had a 2 file wide 2 ranks deep rajtar cavalry unit. It was charged by a 3 file wide 2 ranks deep russian boyar cavalry unit. Because the boyars hit it at an angle during the impact phase the bases slid forward so that all 3 could hit one of the rajtar bases. I assumed ...
by switze01
Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:25 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Conforming during manoevre for melee
Replies: 6
Views: 1030

Re: Conforming during manoevre for melee

Hi So does that mean that if in impact only one base has the move to contact then i can still slide the others forward 2 mu even if they will exceed their move ? Also - i am sure it says you must adopt a legal formation for the melee - that is in this case a straight line or a rectangle. So since my...
by switze01
Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:55 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Conforming during manoevre for melee
Replies: 6
Views: 1030

Conforming during manoevre for melee

Hi All Played OG AM last night for the first time in about 18 months. Realized i seem to have forgotten some basic stuff so what happened was - Norman kn charged Byzant Cv but only one base had the range to hit on the charge - fought the impact with one base vs one base - 2 dice each. Now during the...
by switze01
Sat Jul 07, 2012 2:11 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: nike byzantine infantry
Replies: 10
Views: 2203

nike byzantine infantry

Hi How do the mixed bow/spear nike infantry form up If you have 4 bow and 4 spear do they just go in 2 blocks like this bbss bbss or do the bow go behind the front rank of spear - ssss bbbb Any ideas as if they go side by side surely the bow will get no protection against kn/cv in a melee ? even if ...
by switze01
Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Swedish brigade - 3 ranks for arty
Replies: 1
Views: 835

Swedish brigade - 3 ranks for arty

Hi All One of my club is building one of your 'wonder troops ' ie - so brilliant you just head them for the enemy ie the swedes of gustavus adolphus Looks like with the additional pike to stop them breaking ever i can shoot them as 3 deep with my arty on a 4,5,6 Or they invulnerable on that score as...
by switze01
Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:45 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Pistol armed LH
Replies: 5
Views: 1254

Re: Pistol armed LH

just to specify i meant in terms of shooting
by switze01
Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:42 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Artillery supported by infantry
Replies: 1
Views: 558

Artillery supported by infantry

Hi Bit of an odd question but say if have light arty in the front of a pike/shot unit Just in front of the pike say Now if the arty is attacked effectively you are in melee with the unit behind since they are effecively in the same place - can the shot fire at the same place as the arty who are in f...
by switze01
Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:39 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Scottish Royalist - wars of religion book
Replies: 1
Views: 581

Re: Scottish Royalist - wars of religion book

forget it doh just seen answer once i found errata
by switze01
Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:35 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Scottish Royalist - wars of religion book
Replies: 1
Views: 581

Scottish Royalist - wars of religion book

Hi I think in the sublist for 1645 - it says a minimum of ordinary pike/shot of 12 But then seems to say a minimum of 12 ave pike/shot and a minimum of 6 poor pike/shot i am not in front of the army lists but from memory its confusing Can anyone explain what the minimums for ordinary pike/shot in ro...
by switze01
Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:12 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Short pikes
Replies: 13
Views: 2478

time to call it a day

well my reply would be - what evidence have we that they were a pike/shot unit ?
So if in comps i will use the lists - thanks for ur opinions chaps

Steve
by switze01
Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:54 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Short pikes
Replies: 13
Views: 2478

Impetus

Whoever designed the impetus lists obviously agrees with me on the irish !!!! MONTROSE'S ROYALIST ARMY (VDT=18/9) Nr Type M VBU I VD Notes 2 RE-CP(*) 8 4 2 3 Pistol (various) 2 P&M-FP 5 5 1 2 Pikes - Muskets - MM=-2 2 FP 8 5 4 2 Irish - Muskets - Impetuous 2 FP 8 4 4 2 Highlanders - Impetuous
by switze01
Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:47 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Short pikes
Replies: 13
Views: 2478

Another opinion

I think reid as a dour lowland scot has a serious problem with the erse or highlander irish catholics in general . I am going to do the pikes in case i want to take part in comps but i dont agree with them Here is another opinion off the web - The Irish WERE NOT ARMED WITH PIKES. No source whatsoeve...
by switze01
Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:55 pm
Forum: Modelling
Topic: Montrose Highlander flags
Replies: 10
Views: 3138

Thanks Guys

Ta chaps - still no idea what the highlanders used for flags
Also dont agree with reid on the irish being bog standard pike and shot but thats another story !!!!

Go to advanced search