Search found 99 matches
- Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:52 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Poor light foot bow in Later Sicilians.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1537
- Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:44 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: 15mm - Multiple part castings or not?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4176
I definitely prefer single casting (even for mounted figures). I find that weapons and shields never stay fixed indefinitely and riders almost always sit awkwardly (slight lean anyone?) when glued to their horses unless the horse and rider are sculpted specifically for each other rather than the com...
- Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:22 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Fortifications worth the price
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2196
I think they might make Heavy Artillery interesting - a couple of strong points 15 MU in (and put the Artillery down last so you can choose facing). Not a game winner but will make things different. Linear defenses are not much good. If you man them then the enemy just go round and overwhelm your fl...
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:42 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: First FoG army - too many minis, where do I start?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3427
I would aim to do I unit of a time. Probably 24 or 32 figures at a time. This lets you run a production line, going through with one colour then going back to the start of the line and begin with another (acryilic drying times are quick enough for this). It is worth thinking about how you will disti...
- Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:27 am
- Forum: Historical Scenarios
- Topic: Your favorite Ancient Scenarios (Vote now!)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 14929
No-one mentioned Gaugamela (Arbela if you prefer) I would also make a case for the following Bagradas (First Punic War) Take you pick of Hannibal/Scipio wins(and several have) but if choosing one then Zama Ipsus - the ultimate succer clash? Leuctra Alesia Pharsalus Immae Milvian Bridge Catalaunian P...
- Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:33 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Storing figures?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6176
Box files work well for 15mm. For 25s I use a mixture of toolboxes (steel so takes magnabase if the enamel isn't too think) which are also good for transport as they have a convenient handle, some deep heavy duty cardboard boxes (about box file size) or shoeboxes for elephants and lancers. Friends h...
- Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:11 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Roman v Barbarian Foot - Combat Factors
- Replies: 20
- Views: 4033
I have experimented with wave attacks with Ancient Spanish (front line undrilled, second drilled in 4s). Insufficient attrition to work. It might be worth trying 3 (or maybe even 4) waves with the first 2 or 3 lines in a single rank of 12 stand BGs to minimize the effect of losing them - only 1 rank...
- Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:30 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Modelling and playing in 28mm?2
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2697
My Gripping Beast Romano Brits are 3 to a 60 mm base (a mix of 3s and individuals as they are for both WAB and FoG/DBX) Cavalry are on 25x50 mm and I have some steel bases 60x30 and 60x40mm for basing up as FoG elements for Skirmishers, Medium Foot and cavalry (2 for LF and Cav/Kn, 1 for LH). My Ski...
- Mon May 03, 2010 10:13 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Gallic Confusion...
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1497
The usual rule for internalalies (i.e. from the same list) is that the elements come from the main list for the purposes of minima and maxima calculations, but that the allied contingent must conform to the allied contingent list as well. So a Gallic ally in a Gallic army (for example from a differe...
- Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:10 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Principate Roman Question
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1602
The list describes marines as having been 'converted to legionaries' so the option is presumably available as they have become 'Legionaries'. The option is based on Arrian for 137 (ish) AD against the Alans. I am not aware of anyone else using this deployment, though since he wrote it up his tactica...
- Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:04 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Roads
- Replies: 40
- Views: 5725
- Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:56 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Questions...
- Replies: 23
- Views: 3866
Given the length of time associated with a turn it is not unreasonable for the second commander to choose to commit 'a little bit later' than his opponent. So I would allow a commander to react to the actions of his/her opponent. I usually have some sort of tactical doctrine - Romans almost always s...
- Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:28 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Foederate Roman
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2441
I remain unconvinced about the archers inthe foot battlegroups (1 die at at least -POA doesn't look like good value). In my army I tend to favour the Foot Foederate - Impact foot is quite good, especially with 4 stand BGs of Auxilia to back them up. I favour Heavy Foot for the Auxilia (and don't bot...
- Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:52 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Roads
- Replies: 40
- Views: 5725
- Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:44 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Roads
- Replies: 40
- Views: 5725
Other than the rules as stated - Is there any reason why a road shouls not be able to go straight through/over any passable terrain feature. There are plenty of roads that go through woods and over hills (even steep ones). Especially if they were built by Romans who rarely let terrain get in the way...
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:56 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: What I hate about FOG, and hope will be fixed in new FOGs
- Replies: 223
- Views: 29119
Slingshot has published some articles on alternative army selection systems so worth a look. Almost any battle can be created as a scenario if you have a reasonably detailed account of the forces and terrain. I have done this for several battles which would fit into an equal points format in the pop...
- Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:46 am
- Forum: Player Designed Lists
- Topic: Lists I would still like to see
- Replies: 20
- Views: 9974
Dark Age Greek True - nothing between the Trojan wars and classical - Classical with none of the options would probably give a reasonable approximation (possibly without armoured options and allowing some chariots - Possibly use Kyrenean without the Libyan options. Thessalians - Classical Greek Earl...
- Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:37 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: What I hate about FOG, and hope will be fixed in new FOGs
- Replies: 223
- Views: 29119
For scenario games, refights and the like, then it is not necessary to use any terrain placement rule. The rules are intended as a balancing mechanism and additional tactical thought for players. Seventh edition had deployment options (attack on a marching force, encounter battles) but competitions ...
- Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:32 am
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: lorica segmentata: colour???
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1680
- Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:29 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Organising Yorkists
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3442
One possible way to get Wars of the Roses Armies to behave more like their historical counterparts is to put the Bills/Men-at-Arms in mixed formations wit the billmen. This would shift the balance in favour of close combat while giving the archers a role (possibly with a few longbow only groups to m...