Search found 51 matches
- Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:36 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: bases in combat:moving 2nd rankers
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2789
- Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:41 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Historicon 2010 FoG events
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8187
- Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:47 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Historicon 2010 FoG events
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8187
- Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:07 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Historicon 2010 FoG events
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8187
- Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:35 am
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Origins 2010 Question
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5129
- Tue May 25, 2010 3:31 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Origins 2010 Question
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5129
- Sat May 15, 2010 8:46 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Requests for additions to the FAQ
- Replies: 58
- Views: 11461
- Sat May 15, 2010 8:00 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: CMTs with LH
- Replies: 58
- Views: 8239
- Sat May 15, 2010 3:41 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: CMTs with LH
- Replies: 58
- Views: 8239
- Fri May 14, 2010 10:16 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: CMTs with LH
- Replies: 58
- Views: 8239
- Wed May 05, 2010 12:49 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: VMD & Interceptions
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4287
The way I saw this was that on the declaration phase, the Knights failed the CMT on staying, so they must push forward towards the Cav. Before any flee move and before intercept... do the knights have in there path both targets, Cav who are the reason for charge, and knights who could be contacted ...
- Wed May 05, 2010 3:18 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: VMD & Interceptions
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4287
- Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:44 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Atlanta US Team Tournament - Runners and Riders
- Replies: 38
- Views: 7000
- Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:46 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Interception charges
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
- Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:09 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Interception charges
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
And Dead.... what happened in Madcams and my game was that my unit that would have intercepted did have a 4" rectangle and the charger did go within that rectangle before it hit object A. And for me to understand the ruling... my normail 4" rectangle was reduced due to intervening friends, and that ...
- Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:08 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Interception charges
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
- Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:57 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Interception charges
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
yea.. but B should be further back.. so it cannot be the target of the charge... yet is within the 4" ZOI... Now I understand RBS ruling on this, and maybe I had too much time on my hands and was looking for an escape or a gotcha, I thought that unit B would be triggered due to the charge since it ...
- Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:29 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Interception charges
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
Phil, could you put your artistic skills to work and create a diagram which would keep A exactly where it is. Unit C approx 2-3 inches behind with 1/2 directly behind A the other 1/2 open.... in my example A is the target of the charge. Unit C is not because he is not within the 4" charge range and ...
- Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:05 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Interception charges
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529
- Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:01 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Interception charges
- Replies: 55
- Views: 10529