Search found 22 matches
- Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:09 am
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Has anyone tried Armypainter Quickshade?
- Replies: 49
- Views: 22443
- Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Win the Field of Glory - Final 2 Weeks! Competition now back
- Replies: 14
- Views: 4125
- Sat Jul 19, 2008 7:49 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Has anyone tried Armypainter Quickshade?
- Replies: 49
- Views: 22443
Yeah, in spite of reading ahead of time that the Tudor was the one to get, I tried a couple other shades first as I hadn't tracked down the Tudor yet. Mahogany was dark, but very reddish, and the Antique Walnut was very brown. The walnut works well on figs with a lot of white, tribesmen types etc. L...
- Sat Jul 19, 2008 6:17 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Has anyone tried Armypainter Quickshade?
- Replies: 49
- Views: 22443
Re: quick shade
I got in trouble for saying this at Warlords stand at Partizan, but all quick shade really is, wait for it, its furniture varnish!!. Go to B+Q, Focus etc and theres tins of the stuff, I pay about £4 a tin and it ranges from clear (matt, satin or gloss) to very dark (good for brown horses) medium pi...
- Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:07 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: More on Conforming
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2752
It really is so much easier when pictures are posted :? True but it is slighlty easier to do an ASCII diagram as I don't have to go to the games room, get out the toys, take a photo or three, upload them to the PC, post them on photobucket and then post here :P http://www.vassalengine.org/community...
- Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:20 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: FOG Software Aid??
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2859
- Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:32 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: HUGE COMPETION LAUNCHED, WITH THOUSANDS OF PRIZES TO BE WON
- Replies: 39
- Views: 11580
- Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:09 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Where is the official QRS?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1832
- Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:21 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Rules Question Sub-Forum
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2631
- Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:18 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: "Invalid Session please resubmit"
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4983
- Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:48 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: "Invalid Session please resubmit"
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4983
- Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:45 am
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Basing Basics
- Replies: 31
- Views: 13480
Personally a big fan of the Wargame Accessories metal bases. Pretty cheap- $5 for 24, sturdy since they are metal, no need to try and apply magnetic bases to each base, simply line your storage box with magnetic sheet (far less fiddly than the other way round, trust me on this one). I buy the white ...
- Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:43 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Normans
- Replies: 33
- Views: 11099
- Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:12 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Another charge and evade question
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4091
Hehe, hi Alex. As I was reading the rules again last night it occured to me that had I wheeled the LF a little further the LH group A would have had to wheel to their front to evade following the direction of charge. The rule says you can wheel 180 or 90 degrees, players choice, unless the direction...
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:02 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Another charge and evade question
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4091
All in all the three LH BG's are in a hideous position and really should not have been anywhere near there in the first place. If they fail a CMT to fall back facing the enemy just turn round and run away. :D This is the part I will relay to my opponent! Or perhaps, on second thought, maybe I won't...
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:03 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Another charge and evade question
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4091
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:47 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Another charge and evade question
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4091
Thanks for the reply Hammy, that pretty much jibes with what Simon said in the other thread this post was originally in: 1. You can declare the charge in whatever direction you like as long as it can physically contact one BG by doing so. So its up to you as the charger to make use of this when it i...
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:49 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Charge Question
- Replies: 39
- Views: 8227
Hope all that helps It does indeed. Thanks Simon. I didn't want to charge group A with the Cav as I figured the flank attack from the LF would do pretty well. It did :) We played the rest somewhat wrong though. He evaded with B and since we couldn't figure out if C had to check to evade or could ch...
- Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:36 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Another charge and evade question
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4091
Interesting. We had a related situation in our first test of the rules this evening. A battleline of three light horse BG was charged by a foot skirmish unit on one flank and a cavalry unit from the front. http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w319/Bardspics/DeBellisVassalusMap.png The foot skirmishers...
- Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:58 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: 1 DBx Army = 1 FOG Army?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3259