I will try, thanks!

Honestly, I don't think this game is heavy with micromanagement unless you are a full optimization fanatic. And even then, you'll need to play several times to understand how to optimize everything.
You should try it!

Confirmed, there is no penalty in battle in Empires if no generals ... Now I think about it ... :twisted: At least then it will make sense to use that a 0-0. It's the 0-0 Cowards, Pampereds, Spendthrifts that I want a reason to use! Oh man, do I really want to put him in charge, or not … Speaking o...

Yes, I’m talking about the dlc campaign. I just realised I should bebgetting the phalanx in the middle of this era The pike phalanx was developed in the reign of Phillip II of Macedon, some time between 358 and 338 BC. Yes, I know. I just wanted to know how to make them appear in the videogame sinc...

I'm in a tough war against Persia right now, but finally gaining the upper hand. My allies, Sparta and Byzantion, are also in that war and doing pretty well. I really want to stop hostilities and declare sign a peace treaty, but if I do this my allies will be left alone against Persia and probably c...

Yes, I’m talking about the dlc campaign. I just realised I should bebgetting the phalanx in the middle of this era

I’m playing as macedon... are phalanxes in the game? How can I unlock them?

I agree with travling_canuck statement.
If I had to add anything to the description it would simply be a line telling the player something like "Will replace temple" ( you can already see this in the right part of the screen though)

I didn't know what a 401k was either, but I completely skipped it hahaha
Now i've googled and it's fine.

So basically, having a 0-0 general is useful for sieges and to avoid a penalty against other armies with generals.
Ok, got it.

What's the difference between having a 0-0 general and having no general at all?

OP Persia!

Just don't play Persia. They are too OP.

Exactly.

Hey guys, I just wanted to know your overall opinion on the "Implant trade settlements" regional decision. I've been using it a lot in my macedonia game and I'm controlling some areas around the black sea, Corsica, northern egypt and it really made it a lot faster to conquer Illyria. That ...

From Gognerd's Guide to structures:

Good. Solved issue.

I can agree with that, but gameplay wise it means that in small wars were you can win without recovering provinces, it’s better to focus on attack ad ignore whatever the enemy has occupied, sonce it will return to you when the war is over without the penalty.

Doesnt it work like this?

Not exactly the same case but I've noticed that when an enemy conquers one of your regions and you conquer it back, the region still gets the "just conquered" negative modified.

I'm not sure this is wai. You are liberating you own people, why are you getting a malus for it?

There is a fraction of players, and a fraction of the team, who dislike lengthy tooltips. For them, if a tooltip is too long, it gets in the way, is not read, and probably, you should have put this text elsewhere, like in an online help. I'm 50/50 on that. I see both pro and cons to each philosophy...