Exactly my thought. Wisely looking the other way is a component of leadership. But a rules exception would be one more complication.olivier wrote:I agree with Si and Richard to not deduct the commander bonus but I think they are some example of commander looking other way when some of their troops demonstrated an manly impetus
Commander bonus in CMT
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
-
marioslaz
- Captain - Bf 110D

- Posts: 870
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
- Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy
Yes, but not on battlefield. Anyway, even if a commander try to convince his men to betray, he is following a plan he has in mind. To apply a -1 in a such CMT it's not like to take advantage of a situation, but it's like to incite your men to do differently from your mind. You must keep in mind that one thing is you as a player, and one thing is the general you are playing.olivier wrote:Technically each civil war in Roman empire began with a general who encourage troops to disobey.
And Callinicum was initiated because some of the Belissarius officer want a fight.
Mario Vitale
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28411
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
You can make a theoretical case for it, but in practice it would simply be used by players to evade the prohibition on interpenetrations during charges. Using one rule to evade the intention of another is the definition of cheese.MikeK wrote:Exactly my thought. Wisely looking the other way is a component of leadership. But a rules exception would be one more complication.olivier wrote:I agree with Si and Richard to not deduct the commander bonus but I think they are some example of commander looking other way when some of their troops demonstrated an manly impetus
Indeed. As RBS and I have both said the downsides re more than the upsides.
If we were to want to alter the balance in this we would find a more elegant way to achieve it without such side effects. We have always erred towards getting things historically sensible and then making a good game out of it and avoiding game items that lead to unhistorical behaviour.
This is why FOG games look sensible, when many others are perplexing to lay observers, who for example wondering why 2 LF are holding up 5000 spearmen (I once had to try to explain this to an itnerested member of the public at Campaign and it wasn't easy). So we will always avoid rules that lead to the obtuse after you cunning players
have exploited it.
Si
If we were to want to alter the balance in this we would find a more elegant way to achieve it without such side effects. We have always erred towards getting things historically sensible and then making a good game out of it and avoiding game items that lead to unhistorical behaviour.
This is why FOG games look sensible, when many others are perplexing to lay observers, who for example wondering why 2 LF are holding up 5000 spearmen (I once had to try to explain this to an itnerested member of the public at Campaign and it wasn't easy). So we will always avoid rules that lead to the obtuse after you cunning players
Si
Simon Hall
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"
"May your dice roll 6s (unless ye be poor)"


