Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
Moderators: The Artistocrats, Order of Battle Moderators
-
Applepie68
- Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2022 8:09 pm
Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
This is just a small suggestion but would it be possible to make it so railroads can go through uncaptured territory? I don’t come across this often but occasionally I have one or two units stuck far in the back due to them staying behind to mop up resistance, especially in China (Also will we ever get a China campaign to complement the Japanese one?). I know if you completely encircle the uncaptured territory it will capture it the next turn but sometimes it’s just not possible, and with being unable to draw the exact path for a unit to take it makes capturing the entire length of a railroad quite turn consuming. So I was wondering if it was possible to make it so they worked like other transports in which you can send them as far as their movement allowed and if the happen to hit an enemy they simply get ambushed.
-
FrancoisPhilidor
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:55 pm
- Location: Czechia
Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
I think it's actually good this way, or not? Trains were never used on the frontlines, always only in the rear, I think. Movement in secured territory was faster than in new territory.
China campaign: do you think there is enough interesting content for that?
I mean, if they start covering all minor factions, maybe they would have to make a Romania campaign, the Ethiopian theatre, and many more.
China campaign: do you think there is enough interesting content for that?
I mean, if they start covering all minor factions, maybe they would have to make a Romania campaign, the Ethiopian theatre, and many more.
-
StuccoFresco
- 2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2

- Posts: 669
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2019 11:10 am
Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
Railroads tracks in enemy territory are easily sabotaged, you don't want to run a train directly through the frontlines unless it's an absolute emergency. It's likely you'll end up with a derailed locomotive and a ruined/captured train.
Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
Armored trains may move through enemy territory and switch ownership along the track.
-
Applepie68
- Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2022 8:09 pm
Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
I feel like there is definitely an interest considering the amount of times I've seen it in passing. I personally have been interested in it too considering it is the only major faction that gets consistently left out of war games.FrancoisPhilidor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:37 am I think it's actually good this way, or not? Trains were never used on the frontlines, always only in the rear, I think. Movement in secured territory was faster than in new territory.
China campaign: do you think there is enough interesting content for that?
I mean, if they start covering all minor factions, maybe they would have to make a Romania campaign, the Ethiopian theatre, and many more.
As for the railroad thing I understand it most being used in secure territories but I feel players should definitely be allowed to take the risk considering how trains were still ran in partisan territory. That and it's annoying if most of your forces have moved on and you are 99.9% sure there is no enemy blocking your way and you just want to quickly move a unit..
-
FrancoisPhilidor
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:55 pm
- Location: Czechia
Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
I would never call China a major faction somehow.. They were basically like Ethiopia, just 20 times biggerApplepie68 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 12, 2026 3:57 pmI feel like there is definitely an interest considering the amount of times I've seen it in passing. I personally have been interested in it too considering it is the only major faction that gets consistently left out of war games.FrancoisPhilidor wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:37 am I think it's actually good this way, or not? Trains were never used on the frontlines, always only in the rear, I think. Movement in secured territory was faster than in new territory.
China campaign: do you think there is enough interesting content for that?
I mean, if they start covering all minor factions, maybe they would have to make a Romania campaign, the Ethiopian theatre, and many more.
As for the railroad thing I understand it most being used in secure territories but I feel players should definitely be allowed to take the risk considering how trains were still ran in partisan territory. That and it's annoying if most of your forces have moved on and you are 99.9% sure there is no enemy blocking your way and you just want to quickly move a unit..
Major in size yeah, but in significance?
But Erik has a new China map , check it out
viewtopic.php?t=80862
yeah, I guess you might be right about the trains
-
terminator
- Field Marshal - Gustav

- Posts: 6093
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: the land of freedom
Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
Trains are a rather vulnerable means of transport :
-
FrancoisPhilidor
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:55 pm
- Location: Czechia
Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory
hahaha you are the master of visuals reallyterminator wrote: ↑Thu Jan 15, 2026 6:09 am Trains are a rather vulnerable means of transport :
bataille-du-rail.jpg
