Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Order of Battle is a series of operational WW2 games starting with the Pacific War and then on to Europe!

Moderators: The Artistocrats, Order of Battle Moderators

Post Reply
Applepie68
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 30, 2022 8:09 pm

Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Post by Applepie68 »

This is just a small suggestion but would it be possible to make it so railroads can go through uncaptured territory? I don’t come across this often but occasionally I have one or two units stuck far in the back due to them staying behind to mop up resistance, especially in China (Also will we ever get a China campaign to complement the Japanese one?). I know if you completely encircle the uncaptured territory it will capture it the next turn but sometimes it’s just not possible, and with being unable to draw the exact path for a unit to take it makes capturing the entire length of a railroad quite turn consuming. So I was wondering if it was possible to make it so they worked like other transports in which you can send them as far as their movement allowed and if the happen to hit an enemy they simply get ambushed.
FrancoisPhilidor
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:55 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Post by FrancoisPhilidor »

I think it's actually good this way, or not? Trains were never used on the frontlines, always only in the rear, I think. Movement in secured territory was faster than in new territory.

China campaign: do you think there is enough interesting content for that?
I mean, if they start covering all minor factions, maybe they would have to make a Romania campaign, the Ethiopian theatre, and many more.
StuccoFresco
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 669
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2019 11:10 am

Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Post by StuccoFresco »

Railroads tracks in enemy territory are easily sabotaged, you don't want to run a train directly through the frontlines unless it's an absolute emergency. It's likely you'll end up with a derailed locomotive and a ruined/captured train.
Erik2
Order of Battle Moderator
Order of Battle Moderator
Posts: 9608
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:59 pm
Location: Norway

Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Post by Erik2 »

Armored trains may move through enemy territory and switch ownership along the track.
Applepie68
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 30, 2022 8:09 pm

Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Post by Applepie68 »

FrancoisPhilidor wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:37 am I think it's actually good this way, or not? Trains were never used on the frontlines, always only in the rear, I think. Movement in secured territory was faster than in new territory.

China campaign: do you think there is enough interesting content for that?
I mean, if they start covering all minor factions, maybe they would have to make a Romania campaign, the Ethiopian theatre, and many more.
I feel like there is definitely an interest considering the amount of times I've seen it in passing. I personally have been interested in it too considering it is the only major faction that gets consistently left out of war games.

As for the railroad thing I understand it most being used in secure territories but I feel players should definitely be allowed to take the risk considering how trains were still ran in partisan territory. That and it's annoying if most of your forces have moved on and you are 99.9% sure there is no enemy blocking your way and you just want to quickly move a unit..
FrancoisPhilidor
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:55 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Post by FrancoisPhilidor »

Applepie68 wrote: Mon Jan 12, 2026 3:57 pm
FrancoisPhilidor wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:37 am I think it's actually good this way, or not? Trains were never used on the frontlines, always only in the rear, I think. Movement in secured territory was faster than in new territory.

China campaign: do you think there is enough interesting content for that?
I mean, if they start covering all minor factions, maybe they would have to make a Romania campaign, the Ethiopian theatre, and many more.
I feel like there is definitely an interest considering the amount of times I've seen it in passing. I personally have been interested in it too considering it is the only major faction that gets consistently left out of war games.

As for the railroad thing I understand it most being used in secure territories but I feel players should definitely be allowed to take the risk considering how trains were still ran in partisan territory. That and it's annoying if most of your forces have moved on and you are 99.9% sure there is no enemy blocking your way and you just want to quickly move a unit..
I would never call China a major faction somehow.. They were basically like Ethiopia, just 20 times bigger :-D
Major in size yeah, but in significance?

But Erik has a new China map , check it out

viewtopic.php?t=80862


yeah, I guess you might be right about the trains :-D
terminator
Field Marshal - Gustav
Field Marshal - Gustav
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: the land of freedom

Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Post by terminator »

Trains are a rather vulnerable means of transport :

bataille-du-rail.jpg
bataille-du-rail.jpg (245.02 KiB) Viewed 272 times
FrancoisPhilidor
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 327
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:55 pm
Location: Czechia

Re: Allow railroads though uncaptured territory

Post by FrancoisPhilidor »

terminator wrote: Thu Jan 15, 2026 6:09 am Trains are a rather vulnerable means of transport :


bataille-du-rail.jpg
hahaha you are the master of visuals really
Post Reply

Return to “Order of Battle Series”