Search found 21 matches
- Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:27 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5971
- Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:45 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5971
:-) - Viper, you are a great judge of character and a true friend :-) So, may we quote some battles then, Agincourt, Formigny, Castillon :-) Just as a matter of interest - the French eventually beat the English through the masterful brilliance of Jean and Gaspard Bureau - French masters of Artillery...
- Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:57 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5971
- Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:21 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5971
The stakes prevent the bonuses for 'open terrain'. The terrain type itself does not change, so the knights are not losing combat dice. The stakes blunt the impact of the charge and let the bowmen fight at even odds in the melee round. Point taken. I did not think of it that way - at least the Kn do...
- Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:33 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Deployment Sequence and Ambushes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 911
- Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:19 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Deployment Sequence and Ambushes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 911
Deployment Sequence and Ambushes
If I deploy 3-3-3-2 and part of my second group of 3 I want to put one of the units in ambush, do I then for that section only deploy the 2 on-table units, or do I then deploy 2 and 1 from the next group of 3 and keep going like that ?
Thanks
Thanks
- Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:12 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5971
Yeah Viper - some emotional support - thanks. Good to hear I am not completely subjective seeing as I play Ordonnance French. My Kn can fortunately dismount as Superior HF, Heavy Weapon, so I was not complaining because I had no way of fighting Longbowmen behind stakes - the interaction with terrain...
- Sun Aug 17, 2008 4:14 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5971
Thanks for the reply. I suppose this is one of the situations where you have to simply put your opinion aside and accept the rule and play accordingly. I do not understand the dynamics behind the interpretation. In many of the battles of the 100 years war, the English longbow men setup stakes in dif...
- Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:40 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5971
- Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:33 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5971
Knights v Longbowmen & Stakes
Obviously the stakes provide a modifier + POA for the MF behind stakes v Mounted, in this case Knights. My question pertains to the Knight's POA modifiers. I do not see anywhere mentioned that stakes changes the terrain type present, so my understanding therefor is that MF in the open behind stakes,...
- Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:26 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Bases Turning in Melee
- Replies: 1
- Views: 778
Bases Turning in Melee
Hi guys. Another short question. In the impact phase, enemy LF BG (2 bases deep) declares a charge on my LF BG (also 2 bases deep). Both inside a wood. My LF evades, but rolls a 1 and the enemy LF rolls a 6 and catch them from behind. 1. Is this then again in the same impact phase a charge from behi...
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 2:50 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Threatened Flank
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1016
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:57 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Threatened Flank
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1016
Threatened Flank
Quick question. Can any enemy Battle Group that is within move distance from your Battle Group's flank give you a "-" when testing for having a threatened flank, or must they actually have a legal Flank charge on you - meaning that they cannot have any element partially in front of your Ba...
- Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:45 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Loosing Dice and Shooting in impact phase
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1284
Loosing Dice and Shooting in impact phase
Two questions thats come up this week. 1st Battle Group of 4 bases fights two battle groups to its front in Melee phase. It has two bases fighting one enemy and two fighting another enemy. The Battle Group becomes Disrupted, so loose in per 3 dices. They have only two on one enemy and two on another...
- Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:20 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Heavy Artillery
- Replies: 2
- Views: 926
Heavy Artillery
Two questions. Obviously they cannot move, so they are not listed for being disordered in certain types of terreain under the move distances sections. What terrain can they function in ? They steady in Rough or even Difficult ? Obviously difficult like Woods would affect visibility ranges, but do th...
- Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:10 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: General in Front Rank affecting CT
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1137
- Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:03 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: General in Front Rank affecting CT
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1137
General in Front Rank affecting CT
Can someone please clarify this for me ? If a General joins a Battle Group and stays at the back, he can affect the CT of the Battle Group he is with and who is in Combat, and he can also affect the CT of a Battle group elsewhere in command range and not itself in Combat ? Correct ? On the other han...
- Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:19 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Charging without Orders
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2049
- Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:50 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Charging without Orders
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2049
- Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:14 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Charging without Orders
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2049
Charging without Orders
This might be slightly redundant to ask, because I think the rules are quite clear, but I have played a few games where everybody neglected to act on these rules and I did not think it strange because of the troops involved - only realized the impact later when I read the rules through again. Any &q...