In the Operation Downfall scenario of the US Pacific campaign, a Japanese Type 96 Triple 25 mm AA unit is based on an islet in Tokyo Bay. Yet, the islet does not have a land supply hex; thus, the AA unit’s efficiency dwindles to zero on its own. missing supply hex 2026-07-26 220426.jpg
The islet ...
Search found 103 matches
- Wed Jul 29, 2026 6:16 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Gameplay Bug][Islet missing land supply hex in Operation Downfall scenario][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1148
- Wed Jul 29, 2026 6:10 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Gameplay Bug][Guam missing land supply hex in Philippine Sea scenario][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1091
[Gameplay Bug][Guam missing land supply hex in Philippine Sea scenario][New]
In the Philippine Sea scenario of the US Pacific campaign, a Japanese Type 96 Triple 25 mm AA unit is based on Guam Island. Yet, Guam does not have any land supply hexes; thus, the AA unit’s efficiency dwindles to zero on its own. Guam missing supply hex 2026-07-10 092132.jpg
Guam should have a ...
Guam should have a ...
- Wed Jul 29, 2026 4:06 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Gameplay Bug][Despite destroying Japanese fleet carriers at Coral Sea, Midway shows notice saying not as such][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1140
[Gameplay Bug][Despite destroying Japanese fleet carriers at Coral Sea, Midway shows notice saying not as such][New]
Coral Sea major victory on Fleet Admiral Difficulty 2026-06-26 175222.jpg
In the Coral Sea scenario of the US Pacific campaign, I achieved the secondary objective “Destroy enemy fleet carriers” and thus got a green pushpin on the campaign map before the next scenario, Midway, with a caption saying ...
In the Coral Sea scenario of the US Pacific campaign, I achieved the secondary objective “Destroy enemy fleet carriers” and thus got a green pushpin on the campaign map before the next scenario, Midway, with a caption saying ...
- Fri Jul 17, 2026 7:48 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: Any Yet and ANOTHER bug Land of the Giants
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2033
[Graphical bug][Giant enemy engineers in the scenairo “Summa 39”][New]
Finnish engineers appear as giants for the AI turn they debut. This happens every time in the Summa 39 scenario of the Red Star campaign.
- Fri Jul 17, 2026 2:02 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Gameplay bug][Destroying cargo trucks does not lower Soviet unit efficiency in the Raate Road scenario][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 435
[Gameplay bug][Destroying cargo trucks does not lower Soviet unit efficiency in the Raate Road scenario][New]
Destroying cargo trucks in the Raate Road scenario of the Winter War campaign does not weaken the efficiency of nearby enemy units, as written in the explanation of the secondary objective “Raid Soviet Supply Trucks”: “Destroying Soviet supplies with infantry or tanks will weaken the efficiency of ...
- Fri Jul 17, 2026 1:54 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Text bug][Typo in the briefing of the scenario “Raate Road”][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 412
[Text bug][Typo in the briefing of the scenario “Raate Road”][New]
In the scenario “Raate Road” of the Winter War campaign, there is a typo on page 1 of the briefing.
“west”, which I have highlighted in yellow, should be replaced with “east”.
- Wed Jul 15, 2026 5:07 am
- Forum: Order of Battle : World War II - AAR
- Topic: My review of the Morning Sun campaign
- Replies: 1
- Views: 623
My review of the Morning Sun campaign
I bought this DLC for a 61% off discount. I played through the campaign on max difficulty level (Kamikaze difficulty). My verdict: Morning Sun features many unhistorical elements and has many bugs, yet it is fun. The discounted game is worth the money.
I have reported all the bugs I found in the OOB ...
I have reported all the bugs I found in the OOB ...
- Tue Jul 14, 2026 1:55 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Series
- Topic: Why couldn't I spawn fighter aircraft at this airfield?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 558
Why couldn't I spawn fighter aircraft at this airfield?
Could anyone explain why I could not spawn fighter aircraft at this airfield but could spawn reconnaissance aircraft there? Is it because the airfield has already allocated 9 supplies to maintain the 3 G3M bombers in the air, and the remaining 1 supply is not enough to get another 3-supply-costing ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 8:48 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Change-Request][Clarify requirements for the Steam achievement “Order of the Rising Sun”][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2482
[Change-Request][Clarify requirements for the Steam achievement “Order of the Rising Sun”][New]
Many players have difficulty achieving the “Order of the Rising Sun” Steam achievement. This is partly due to a lack of information about the strength mechanics in this game. Some players destroyed a 5-strength enemy unit by banzai charge, but failed to get the achievement. This is because these ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 8:43 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Gameplay Bug][Steam achievement “Order of the Rising Sun” achieved without meeting requirements][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2414
[Gameplay Bug][Steam achievement “Order of the Rising Sun” achieved without meeting requirements][New]
Steam achievements state that to obtain the achievement “Order of the Rising Sun”, the player must “Use the Banzai Charge ability to destroy an enemy unit, dealing at least 5 points of damage.” order of the rising sun 2024-10-21 150232.jpg Yet, I didn't destroy an airstrip with a banzai attack but ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 8:34 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Change-Request][Asian town missing a road bridge][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2358
[Change-Request][Asian town missing a road bridge][New]
In the scenario “Guangdong” of the Morning Sun campaign, an unnamed Asian town in the south-central part of the scenario map is missing a road bridge.
As other river hexes with a dirt road all have a road bridge, I request that a road bridge be added.
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 8:30 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Change-Request][Guangzhou missing a road bridge][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2439
[Change-Request][Guangzhou missing a road bridge][New]
In the scenario “Guangdong” of the Morning Sun campaign, the city of Guangzhou, near the western edge of the scenario map, is missing a road bridge. Guangzhou missing road bridge 2024-09-16 082328.jpg
As other river hexes with a paved road all have a road bridge, I request that a road bridge be ...
As other river hexes with a paved road all have a road bridge, I request that a road bridge be ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 8:26 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Gameplay Bug][Ineffective primary victory point in the Guangdong scenario][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2359
[Gameplay Bug][Ineffective primary victory point in the Guangdong scenario][New]
5 eastern primary VPs 2024-09-16 081326.jpg In the scenario “Guangdong” of the Morning Sun campaign, to achieve the primary objective of “Hold 3 eastern Primary VP”, the number of eastern primary VPs controlled by the Japanese must not fall below three. However, Donglong’s primary victory point isn ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 8:16 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Change-Request][Allow IJN marine units to perform Banzai charges][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2451
[Change-Request][Allow IJN marine units to perform Banzai charges][New]
In the scenario “Guangdong” of the Morning Sun campaign, a Japanese Marine '39 unit of the IJN flag faction doesn't have the banzai charge ability. navy marines don't have banzai charge option 2024-09-16 074157.jpg It would be nice if the specializations unlocked for my IJA faction, including the ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 7:43 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Text Bug][Typos in Guangdong scenario objective award descriptions][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2401
[Text Bug][Typos in Guangdong scenario objective award descriptions][New]
In the scenario “Guangdong” of the Morning Sun campaign, the award descriptions for two primary objectives have the same typo. These objectives are: “Hold 2 western Primary VP” and “Hold 3 eastern Primary VP”. Their award descriptions are included in the images below. in the form of 2024-09-15 ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 7:34 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Text Bug][Typo in the briefing of the scenario “Guangdong”][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2337
[Text Bug][Typo in the briefing of the scenario “Guangdong”][New]
In the scenario “Guangdong” of the Morning Sun campaign, there is a typo on page 3 of the briefing.
“Guanzhou”, which I have underlined in red, should be replaced with “Guangzhou”.
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 7:30 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Gameplay Bug][Insufficient RP given upon achieving an objective in the Nanning scenario][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2335
[Gameplay Bug][Insufficient RP given upon achieving an objective in the Nanning scenario][New]
In the scenario “Nanning” of the Morning Sun campaign, when having achieved the primary objective, “Take control of the Kunlun Pass”, only 100 RP are rewarded, instead of the 150 RP stated in the objective description: “150 Resource Points will be obtained from the destruction of all Chinese ground ...
- Mon Jul 13, 2026 7:20 am
- Forum: Order of Battle Bug Submissions
- Topic: [Text Bug][Typo in Nanchang scenario briefing][New]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2368
[Text Bug][Typo in Nanchang scenario briefing][New]
In the scenario “Nanchang” of the Morning Sun campaign, there is a typo on page 5 of the briefing.
“Nachang”, which I have underlined in red, should be replaced with “Nanchang”.
- Sat Jun 20, 2026 4:59 am
- Forum: Order of Battle : World War II - Scenario Design
- Topic: Erik's campaigns, mods and multiplayer scenarios
- Replies: 2942
- Views: 1059773
Re: Erik's campaigns, mods and multiplayer scenarios
redStick
Both 'Gemany West 1940' and 'Germany East 1941' should be available to import cores into Germany East 1942.
cores.jpg
Yet only the "Germany West 1940" core is available for selection, which is the situation shown by the screenshot in my last post. supposedly two cores 2026-06-20 ...
- Thu Jun 18, 2026 8:17 am
- Forum: Order of Battle : World War II - Scenario Design
- Topic: Erik's campaigns, mods and multiplayer scenarios
- Replies: 2942
- Views: 1059773
Re: Erik's campaigns, mods and multiplayer scenarios
Hello Erik.
Currently, the core allowable for importation into the “Germany East 1942” campaign is the “Germany West 1940” core. It should be the “Germany East 1941” core. I want to use the captured KV-1 that I gained in “Germany East 1941”.
Currently, the core allowable for importation into the “Germany East 1942” campaign is the “Germany West 1940” core. It should be the “Germany East 1941” core. I want to use the captured KV-1 that I gained in “Germany East 1941”.