Ordered mine on the 21st Jan, dispatched to me 22nd Jan.
Aaron
Search found 85 matches
- Sun Jan 27, 2013 8:21 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: V2 books in stock
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3494
- Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:46 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Info on Figures
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1270
Re: Info on Figures
They look like Old Glory
- Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:10 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: Paint stripper
- Replies: 4
- Views: 925
- Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:56 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Army from Empires of the Dragon
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4089
- Thu Sep 08, 2011 7:06 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Cohesion and State
- Replies: 2
- Views: 710
- Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:53 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Cohesion and State
- Replies: 2
- Views: 710
Cohesion and State
Hi all,
Need to clear up a debate from tonight.
A MF Offensive spear unit is disordered in a wood. Is it still steady?
I am saying it is as there is no drop in cohesion.
Am I correct?
Cheers
Aaron
Need to clear up a debate from tonight.
A MF Offensive spear unit is disordered in a wood. Is it still steady?
I am saying it is as there is no drop in cohesion.
Am I correct?
Cheers
Aaron
- Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:39 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Portable Defenses
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6562
- Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:55 am
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: Garagecon - Nelson, New Zealand - July 23/24 - 800pts
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2940
- Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:49 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: 8 average or 6 superior MF?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 6388
- Tue Jul 12, 2011 2:14 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Where did these new icons come from
- Replies: 60
- Views: 8773
- Thu Jun 16, 2011 7:34 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Syrian States 800pts
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4818
Detracting back to the original post. My initial thought regarding Syrian States is the fact its foot is not compulsory. Its LH contingent is strong and it contains lancer cav. Have you thought of dropping the spear making room for more LH? Something along the lines of 4 x TC 2 x 4 Cv Arm Sup Drille...
- Tue May 31, 2011 8:18 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: The game of shame
- Replies: 35
- Views: 5442
- Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:52 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: The notorious girlfriend's army: Fatimid Egypt
- Replies: 32
- Views: 6093
- Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:07 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Catalan Company
- Replies: 40
- Views: 6891
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:54 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: IWF 2011 - New Zealand
- Replies: 153
- Views: 17642
- Sun Feb 27, 2011 8:25 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: IWF 2011 - New Zealand
- Replies: 153
- Views: 17642
- Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:05 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Charging without orders
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3826
- Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:03 pm
- Forum: Modelling
- Topic: A square peg in a round hole
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3873
- Mon Jan 10, 2011 9:44 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Terrain and POAs
- Replies: 36
- Views: 4043
- Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:11 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: A new and improved question about my Samurai list
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3111
The Heavy Weapon negates the armour differences and shooting is somewhat negated by the IC and rear support. The cavalry are a problem in this list as it gives your opponent something to surround and cut down, unless you leave them with your foot in which case why not just use foot. Rather than 3x8 ...