Je serai dans le coin ce weekend là donc je m'inscris dans la poule antique.
Julian
Search found 547 matches
- Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:26 pm
- Forum: French Speaking Forum
- Topic: 3ème Tournoi GERMANICUS de Chaniers 21 et 22 janvier 2012
- Replies: 148
- Views: 23416
- Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:00 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: mid-Republican Roman Allies - which is 'best' for tournament
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6967
- Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:02 am
- Forum: French Speaking Forum
- Topic: Favour
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1683
- Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:47 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Mid Republican Roman Fortified Camp
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3278
- Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:55 am
- Forum: French Speaking Forum
- Topic: Favour
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1683
Sounds like the part was written for me: anglo-spanish raised in France!
PM doesn't seem to be working. Email me at: jacques_lien@hotmail.com
Julian
PM doesn't seem to be working. Email me at: jacques_lien@hotmail.com
Julian
- Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:08 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Objectives (not under consideration for v.2)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1563
- Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:56 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Objectives (not under consideration for v.2)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1563
A 4 AP loss for an objective is a lot and that woudl contribute to a final decision. I was talking to the old WRG 7th/Warrior organizers. They have dumped their terrain rules. Gone for pre-set terrain. And increased the deployment zone for more frontal action. They claim it has re-energized part of...
- Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:38 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Objectives (not under consideration for v.2)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1563
Objectives (not under consideration for v.2)
Last weekend we played a tournament near Barcelona using FOG v1 with objectives using the following rules: 1. Pre-set terrain with initiative winner (attacker) choosing side. 2. Defender moves up to two pieces of terrain as per rule (6 becomes 5) 3. Defender places camp followed by attacker 4. Attac...
- Thu Jul 14, 2011 8:43 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Late Republician Roman
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1740
- Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:41 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: anti Benny-Hill measures
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4159
Armies that used skirmishing tactics and feigned flight tactics would not have been phased by the entire army evading. Besides, a BG wouldn't be able to see beyond the BGs on its flank. They would have little idea of what was going on beyond their immediate vicinity. Not happy with the first idea. S...
- Tue May 31, 2011 6:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: The game of shame
- Replies: 35
- Views: 5722
- Sat May 28, 2011 8:32 am
- Forum: French Speaking Forum
- Topic: XIIème Tournoi FOG Montmeló (Barcelone) 16-17 juillet 2011
- Replies: 0
- Views: 627
XIIème Tournoi FOG Montmeló (Barcelone) 16-17 juillet 2011
XIIème Tournoi FOG Montmeló (Barcelone) Le tournoi aura lieu à Montmelo, près de Barcelone le 16 et 17 juillet 2011 Inscription : 20 euros avant le 3 juillet, 30 euros après. Thème : De Rome à Charlemagne Listes : 800 points. Toutes les listes de 425AD à 853AD et dans les frontiers géographiques de ...
- Fri May 27, 2011 10:28 pm
- Forum: Tournaments
- Topic: XIIth Montmeló (Barcelona) FOG Tournament - 16-17th july 201
- Replies: 0
- Views: 664
XIIth Montmeló (Barcelona) FOG Tournament - 16-17th july 201
XIIth Montmeló (Barcelona) FOG Tournament The tournament will take place in Montmelo, near Barcelona on the 16-17th July 2011 Registration fee: 20 euros before 3rd July, 30 euros thereafter Theme : Rome to Charlemagne Lists : 800 points. All lists from 425AD to 853AD and within the geographical limi...
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:02 pm
- Forum: MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion
- Topic: Strategic movement feature...or bug?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 817
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:20 am
- Forum: MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion
- Topic: Artillery?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2856
Except for the Russians, no army in WW II one really used traditional WW I style massive bombardments, so having it as tech work better in this game. Jyri I suspect the Axis troops at El Alamein might disagree with you on that one. ;) Given most units in the game are corps level, there might be a c...
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:14 am
- Forum: MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion
- Topic: Imbalance between Axis and Allies?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2709
Imbalance between Axis and Allies?
I've played about five PBEM games on both sides and I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that it's very difficult for the Axis to last until 1945 unless they play an almost flawless game. If you repeat historical blunders like Stalingrad, you're toast well before the historical date for the fall of ...
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:59 am
- Forum: MILITARY HISTORY™ Commander - Europe at War : General Discussion
- Topic: Strategic movement feature...or bug?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 817
Strategic movement feature...or bug?
I´m playing a PBEM game as the Axis and have reached the Urals. I can rail units into cities but I can't rail them back out. Is this a feature or a bug?
- Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:16 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Skilled Swordsmen
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4096
Skilled Swordsmen
In order to reduce the effectiveness of Roman legionaries vs barbarian foot without having to remove the skilled swordsmen ability alltogether, how about this for a solution: Skilled Swordsmen no longer gives a POA but instead gives a -1 to enemy infantry's death roll making winning combats harder b...
- Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:53 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Romans
- Replies: 67
- Views: 11177
I didn’t bother to collect that stats on that but it might suggest that Legion heavy Roman army isn’t an easy one for inexperienced players even if it’s a popular choice. I suspect those players lost because all the crappy auxiliary BGs (Numidians, LF, cavalry) were the prime target of their oppone...
- Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:22 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Romans
- Replies: 67
- Views: 11177
1. But did the Romans beat the Hellenistics by frontal attacks on the phalanx in good order, or by outflanking or breaking up its formation (as Polybius describes), Both. Actually, to be pedantic, the Romans never won a single frontal battle against a continuous phalanx in good order. They won it b...