Thanks, but the basic game works perfectly. I don't use steam.
FINALLY SOLVED, UNINSTALLING AND REINSTALLING WITH THE KEY NUMBER OF SANDSTORM. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

I have bought sandstorm and I have installed version 10 of ORDER OF BATTLE... WELL I CAN'T INSTALL SANDSTORM BECAUSE IT GIVES ME A MESSAGE THAT SAYS IT CAN'T FIND THE BASED GAME

All five aircraft had been placed in the hangar in the previous turn. (None of them were reinforced.)And there was one outside waiting to take off. It only lets me take two planes out of the five. This has happened to me other times, I don't know if it's normal. Version 9.0.3.

Same problems in Version 9.0.3. Totally agree, they are also very expensive to put. Once I put up a mine, which costs 20, and passed a truck that only suffered one loss. This is completely ridiculous. It would even be good if the engineers, after laying the mine, could get away by truck on the same ...

Wow, I'm sorry. I didn't know that worked that way. It may have happened in Fog II Ancients some time maybe, but, as happens when I switched to the next turn of the game, I haven't noticed or thought I was already like this in the previous turn. This means that charges need to be planned with that ...

As you can see, lancers and knights are melee in turn seven. A unit of my warriors threatens to charge on the flank..., (in this case in two turns (because it is unmaniobrable))... But, in turn 8, miraculously, lancers have rotated to avoid the flank-charge when they are still melee. It's happened ...

It certainly would be important, but we are not aware that such a bug exists. There may be some other explanation for what you have seen. For example, occasionally a unit can break off from combat without actually moving, if something moved behind it as a result of a compulsory move after the resul...

I've had the first Field of Glory II for years. Now I bought the medieval and I am surprised by this bug, which has already happened to me several times. When you're in hand-to-hand combat against an enemy unit and, with another unit, you put it to make a charge down the flank... surprisingly, in th...

Pocus wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:27 pm Sorry I thought I answered somewhere on this issue. I double checked the code and everything is fine, so I don't understand. But rest assured, with the new game, when it is beta time, if there is a bug, it will reappear!

okey

Pocus wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 1:45 pm Ok, I got them, I should have some time next week, stay tuned.

I'm still tuned. But the truth is, I don't play anymore, I've lost interest. If it's just for me, you don't have to do anything. Unless you want to fix those things for future updates. Thanks anyway.

Pocus wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:58 am Got your messages. You can send files to Slitherine support saying that's for me. support@slitherine.co.uk

I just did. Two emails, because not all the files fit in the 30 Mb that Slitherine allows.

I must say that I was wrong, indeed the pacht corrects the problems of unexplained losses in accounting. The administrative burden remains great because the Empire is growing, after a few turns, but I no longer have any surprises in accounting expectations. Thanks a lot. Well, no, I think I've talk...

I would need to check what is exactly going on. I would need the saved game before raiding. Perhaps that's just bad luck, perhaps a bug has appeared. I sent you a private message ( I've got it in outbox, but since I haven't used it before, I'm not sure it's sent) asking how to send you the files, i...

Now I think about it, the % chance is not the only possible problem ... It might be that they lost a lot of money so the transaction was cancelled because they could not fulfill their part of the deal. https://i.ibb.co/fnC6L5R/Screen-00000004.jpg I always make sure that whoever's going to pay me ha...

Game error? I've only played with the Romans, so I don't know if it happens with other factions as well. When I plunder a region with the Romans, it always happens to me, there is no effect. On the next turn, he tells me that the province has been looted, but there is nothing in the province to indi...

Weird, the check is simple and should work, this is at line 1396 of host.bsf ... the raider checks against enemy army power, garrisoned or not. I think, as I see around here, it happens to many of us who clearly notice that all our efforts at this point seem useless. Because it happens to us many t...

They should accept at 75%. That's very weird. You can lose legacy rarely if you propose conditions that have very low chance. Thankyou. Yes, it's very rare. It hasn't happened to me with any other faction. Only with the Sarmatians. First it happened about turn 140 with a transaction qualified as tr...

They should accept at 75%. That's very weird. You can lose legacy rarely if you propose conditions that have very low chance. Thankyou. Yes, it's very rare. It hasn't happened to me with any other faction. Only with the Sarmatians. First it happened about turn 140 with a transaction qualified as tr...

DSP3000 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 12, 2020 4:40 am Why is this in spanish?

Sorry, it's translation. I don't know why the title remained in Spanish. I forgot to change it probably. I've already corrected it.

The Sarmatians do not accept a transaction classified as diplomatic of 75%, I offer 840 human potential per 1120 gold, and a message appears that our relations have deteriorated. But, most surprisingly, it says I lose 180 legacy points. Is this normal? And why does one have to lose legacy for offeri...