Conforming to routers
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Conforming to routers
If a BG charges routers must it conform. If it does can it then do other conform things like shift bases into contact?
If it doesn't can I then angle my charge so that I can shepherd the routers in the direction I want?
If it doesn't can I then angle my charge so that I can shepherd the routers in the direction I want?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: Conforming to routers
Yes and no. Since the bases would never (ever) fight then you can't expand.philqw78 wrote:If a BG charges routers must it conform. If it does can it then do other conform things like shift bases into contact?
No for the reason above.If it doesn't can I then angle my charge so that I can shepherd the routers in the direction I want?
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Conforming to routers
Perhaps you could go back to basics please?
1. Can a BG declare a charge on a routing enemy BG?
2. If the answer to Q1 is "yes", what are the mechanics of resolving the impact, combat and joint action phases?
1. Can a BG declare a charge on a routing enemy BG?
2. If the answer to Q1 is "yes", what are the mechanics of resolving the impact, combat and joint action phases?
Re: Conforming to routers
You can (and indeed must if you are shock) declare charges on routers.zoltan wrote:Perhaps you could go back to basics please?
1. Can a BG declare a charge on a routing enemy BG?
2. If the answer to Q1 is "yes", what are the mechanics of resolving the impact, combat and joint action phases?
There is no impact or melee, just a pursuit in the jap as normal against routers.
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
davidandlynda
- 1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18

- Posts: 830
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 9:17 am
Re: Conforming to routers
The trick then is that the routers must rout in the direction of the charge, can sometimes have useful effects
David
David
Re: Conforming to routers
Nope, because the chargers conform in the movement phasedavidandlynda wrote:The trick then is that the routers must rout in the direction of the charge, can sometimes have useful effects
David
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Re: Conforming to routers
I've played this wrong in the past.
The conforming rules are all about conforming to the enemy in close combat. Since close combat stops once one side has routed, I think it's the case that there is no close combat going on, so you don't conform. Hence I think you can actually direct the routers in this way; which I've played wrong before.
The conforming rules are all about conforming to the enemy in close combat. Since close combat stops once one side has routed, I think it's the case that there is no close combat going on, so you don't conform. Hence I think you can actually direct the routers in this way; which I've played wrong before.
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Re: Conforming to routers
there's a bit in the Impact section which specifically deals with how charging routers works.zoltan wrote:Perhaps you could go back to basics please?
1. Can a BG declare a charge on a routing enemy BG?
2. If the answer to Q1 is "yes", what are the mechanics of resolving the impact, combat and joint action phases?
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Conforming to routers
So we can shepherd routers in the direction of charge then. Brilliant!
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
petedalby
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: Conforming to routers
Always have been able to.So we can shepherd routers in the direction of charge then. Brilliant!
Pete
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Conforming to routers
Back to the mechanics then....
During the Impact Phase I charge routers and make contact with them on an angle (in other words the front corner, not the front edge, of my base is the first thing to touch the routers). Nothing more happens until the JAP (i.e. my chargers don't line up because no close combat will be fought). In the JAP, routers make a rout move directly away from the enemy in contact. This causes them to wheel to be parallel with the front edge of my (former) chargers.
During the Impact Phase I charge routers and make contact with them on an angle (in other words the front corner, not the front edge, of my base is the first thing to touch the routers). Nothing more happens until the JAP (i.e. my chargers don't line up because no close combat will be fought). In the JAP, routers make a rout move directly away from the enemy in contact. This causes them to wheel to be parallel with the front edge of my (former) chargers.
