Major error with Persians

Moderators: Slitherine Core, FoG PC Moderator, NewRoSoft

Post Reply
deeter
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:52 pm

Major error with Persians

Post by deeter »

The Median cavalry is listed as heavy armored and is treated as such in melee, but moves a normal cavalry not as cataphracts. In the TT lists, these are normal armored cavalry. Oddly, in the TT lists there are no cataphracts for the Persians, but I recall there were thousands at Guagamela.

Deeter
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Re: Major error with Persians

Post by batesmotel »

deeter wrote:The Median cavalry is listed as heavy armored and is treated as such in melee, but moves a normal cavalry not as cataphracts. In the TT lists, these are normal armored cavalry. Oddly, in the TT lists there are no cataphracts for the Persians, but I recall there were thousands at Guagamela.

Deeter
The TT Late Achaemenid list qualifies the Saka and Bactrians as armoured cavalry rather than as heavily armoured cataphracts. Not entirely sure how the decision was made.

Chris
....where life is beautiful all the time
deeter
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by deeter »

Going through the Persian lists, a c and e charge 18 points for Median cavalry, but 12 points for b and d although the stats don't change in any list. Clearly these cavalry are very confused, fighing like cats but moving like cav with varying point values throughout.

Deeter

P.S. Hmm, fight like cats, move like cav and all for only 12 points? I'll be the first to take these after the evil Bosporan cav.
keithmartinsmith
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm

Post by keithmartinsmith »

When posting a message to the Beta Forum can you state the version you are using: Its to the bottom left of the screen on loading the game. The current version is 1.2.10. Thanks Keith
deeter
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by deeter »

With 1.2.10 the problem is still there with Persia (b) and (e).

Deeter
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28396
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Major error with Persians

Post by rbodleyscott »

batesmotel wrote:
deeter wrote:The Median cavalry is listed as heavy armored and is treated as such in melee, but moves a normal cavalry not as cataphracts. In the TT lists, these are normal armored cavalry. Oddly, in the TT lists there are no cataphracts for the Persians, but I recall there were thousands at Guagamela.

Deeter
The TT Late Achaemenid list qualifies the Saka and Bactrians as armoured cavalry rather than as heavily armoured cataphracts. Not entirely sure how the decision was made.

Chris
They did have some horse armour, but the armour for horse and man was not complete enough to qualify as cataphracts under the rules. True cataphracts had not been invented at that date - they were invented in the following century - probably the Saka were the first to use them, at least in the west.

Obviously all troops have to be slotted into the 4 available armour categories, so that there is going to be a fair variation within each grade. We have to have a cut off point somewhere, and the cavalry at Guagemela don't quite make the Heavily Armoured grade.
keithmartinsmith
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:26 pm

Post by keithmartinsmith »

The errors in the early list are fixed ready for 1.2.11 and getting ready to add the later Persians and Hellenistics to the update :-) Keith
Post Reply

Return to “Old Beta Test”