I've noticed that Red Army has the pak front trait by default. It works with configuration: defender , non-core AT (first) and core AT (support). Is it intentional? It'a a huge advantage btw
: Red Army trilogy
Moderators: The Artistocrats, Order of Battle Moderators
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
: Red Army trilogy
I'm playing Red Steel for now and...
I've noticed that Red Army has the pak front trait by default. It works with configuration: defender , non-core AT (first) and core AT (support). Is it intentional? It'a a huge advantage btw
I've noticed that Red Army has the pak front trait by default. It works with configuration: defender , non-core AT (first) and core AT (support). Is it intentional? It'a a huge advantage btw
Re: : Red Army trilogy
It's because of the huge AT kill zones in the Kursk Salient, which copied the pakfront idea, but also took it further.
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
I'm talking about "the quasi-pakfront" available in the 41 and 42 (Red Steel
probably Red Star too). Far before Kursk (three scenarios at least). It works only
with non-core and core at units.
I'e started the Red Storm just now and:
1. That "overrun" bug is still present. Autosave becomes corrupted. The manual save does not.
2. Why the Panthers & Flamms at the Prokhorovka
Tigers , Stugs , Pz IV G , Pz III N,M , and captured T-34 are enough
(and far more realistic).
3. "The quasi-pakfront" (without the real specialization taken) works at the Prokhorovka too.
I'e started the Red Storm just now and:
1. That "overrun" bug is still present. Autosave becomes corrupted. The manual save does not.
2. Why the Panthers & Flamms at the Prokhorovka
3. "The quasi-pakfront" (without the real specialization taken) works at the Prokhorovka too.
Re: : Red Army trilogy
I'm not sure what you mean by "quasi-pakfront". I did a short editor test attacking a Soviet AT aux with core AT behind. No AT support was given. What does happen is AT support for a non AT defender from multiple adjacent ATs - but that is unrelated to pakfront, and same for other countries.
Do you have a save that demonstrates what the issue is?
Do you have a save that demonstrates what the issue is?
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
So what's the difference between at with and without the pakfront ?
Defender is supported by the multiple adjacent ats by default? And no pak front is necessary?
And with the pakfront spec second (and next) ats may not be adjacent?
Will look at the replays and I choose one.
Defender is supported by the multiple adjacent ats by default? And no pak front is necessary?
And with the pakfront spec second (and next) ats may not be adjacent?
Will look at the replays and I choose one.
Re: : Red Army trilogy
Standard AT support is given to non-AT.
Pakfront allows ATs to support eachother.
Pakfront allows ATs to support eachother.
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
So is multiple AT support given to the defender without pakfront?
But if the defender is AT is it not ?
But if the defender is AT is it not ?
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
4. Po 2 Commander bug
After Red Steel I was able to detach the (nice one) Po 2's Commander to the Aircobras unit but not able to re-attach to another unit even the Po 2
?
After Red Steel I was able to detach the (nice one) Po 2's Commander to the Aircobras unit but not able to re-attach to another unit even the Po 2
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
Check this .rec please.
AT/pakfront bug and the Po 2's Commander bug.
AT/pakfront bug and the Po 2's Commander bug.
- Attachments
-
Rumiancew 43.zip- (28.16 KiB) Downloaded 67 times
-
terminator
- Field Marshal - Gustav

- Posts: 6009
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: the land of freedom
Re: : Red Army trilogy
It looks like there’s a problem with this Air Commander, we can detach the other Air Commanders except her
-
GabeKnight
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040

- Posts: 3710
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
I see no bug/problem with the AT support/pakfront mechanic:

It's intentional, she has got an "undetachable" trait to her...terminator wrote: ↑Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:19 pm It looks like there’s a problem with this Air Commander, we can detach the other Air Commanders except her![]()
-
terminator
- Field Marshal - Gustav

- Posts: 6009
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: the land of freedom
Re: : Red Army trilogy
This is what I thought but it should be indicated in the "Unit Traits"GabeKnight wrote: ↑Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:55 pmIt's intentional, she has got an "undetachable" trait to her...terminator wrote: ↑Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:19 pm It looks like there’s a problem with this Air Commander, we can detach the other Air Commanders except her![]()
![]()
[KACIARYNA_KASYANOVA]
id = 94
category = air
faction = ussr
weapon = infantry_attack, 1
defense = air_defense, 2
shock = 10
range = 0
camouflaged
undetachable
What is camouflaged ? Undetectable by radar ?
-
terminator
- Field Marshal - Gustav

- Posts: 6009
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: the land of freedom
Re: : Red Army trilogy
It should be presented in this way for example:
-
terminator
- Field Marshal - Gustav

- Posts: 6009
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: the land of freedom
Re: : Red Army trilogy
How did you arrive to detach the undetachable Air Commander from the Polikarpov Po-2 ?shiroronin wrote: ↑Thu Jan 07, 2021 6:58 pm Check this .rec please.
AT/pakfront bug and the Po 2's Commander bug.
The Po-2 plane was shot down ? Po-2 plane upgraded ? The undetachable Air Commander was injured ?
Last edited by terminator on Fri Jan 08, 2021 7:23 am, edited 3 times in total.
-
GabeKnight
- Lieutenant-General - Karl-Gerat 040

- Posts: 3710
- Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
...or "disband" or just core import.
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
@Terminator
No.Nope.Never
After Red Steel I've imported the core units to the Red Storm.
Po 2's (cute) Commander was available to assign (as the others). I did not use her at the Prochorowka (first scenario). So she was available at the second (Rumiancew). I've assigned her to Aircobras unit
then.
btw
It will be great to honor the Night Witches' real mother & Commander Marina Raskowa (eng. Rascova or Raskova) though
No.Nope.Never
After Red Steel I've imported the core units to the Red Storm.
Po 2's (cute) Commander was available to assign (as the others). I did not use her at the Prochorowka (first scenario). So she was available at the second (Rumiancew). I've assigned her to Aircobras unit
btw
It will be great to honor the Night Witches' real mother & Commander Marina Raskowa (eng. Rascova or Raskova) though
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
5. BUG (Red Steel) third scenario Kerch-Eltigen 43
Secondary objective "do not lose more than 4 ships" doesn't work properly. I did lose 1 ship but the objective had became unchecked
So my +2 spec lost
Check the .rec please.
Secondary objective "do not lose more than 4 ships" doesn't work properly. I did lose 1 ship but the objective had became unchecked
Check the .rec please.
- Attachments
-
Kerch Eltigen 43.zip- (25.04 KiB) Downloaded 68 times
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
Sorry RED STORM 
-
shiroronin
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:27 pm
Re: : Red Army trilogy
FIXED.
Reload of the last turn helped
Reload of the last turn helped
-
terminator
- Field Marshal - Gustav

- Posts: 6009
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: the land of freedom
Re: : Red Army trilogy
KACIARYNA KASYANOVA would be more appropriate for a tactical bomber than a fighter ?
