Modern Conflicts 2.15 (RELEASED)

[HHT1]

Herrlich Akkula.

Äh I was going to say wonderful Akkula.
Thank you very much and keep up the good work.

Many greetings
HHT1 aka Hans1

[uzbek2012]

More diverse tasks , and then it becomes boring ) On a large map )

viewtopic.php?f=147&t=105728&start=20

The most striking soldiers ' monuments in the world
https://yandex.ru/turbo?text=https%3A%2 ... ialov.html

[Shoughie]

Loving the new update. I’ve just finished a Big Scenario NATO game. Much more balanced difficulty In my opinion. I was wondering if with the increase in static defenders and mines will any more nations be given engineers? Anyway love the mod, can’t wait to see what comes next!

[Akkula]

Loving the new update. I’ve just finished a Big Scenario NATO game. Much more balanced difficulty In my opinion. I was wondering if with the increase in static defenders and mines will any more nations be given engineers? Anyway love the mod, can’t wait to see what comes next!

Hi Shoughie!.
In the coming weeks I will announce what to expect in 1.6
It is going to be a major update: lot of new playable content.

[Shoughie]

I have but one burning question. Will Turkey make the cut this time?

[uzbek2012]

I don't know about Turkey, but I would like the Syrian Army to be ) Well, give Georgians the opportunity to buy units + add a Cobra armored car )
It would also not be bad to make an Azerbaijani army ( although if they are made, Turkey will need both ) and an Armenian one ) And then there are these countries on the map but they are empty

[Turtler]

Agreed with Uzbek. There's a lot of great potential in this mod, and the Middle East is a natural place to look for it in.

[Turtler]

Duplicate Please Delete.

[Akkula]

I have but one burning question. Will Turkey make the cut this time?

I cannot make promises that are hard to fulfill. Turkey would trigger a chain reaction as it would force me to add Armenia, Syria, modern Irak, Azerbaijan and so on.... an nice workload addition
May don't worry, I am already working on the new features which I will announce soon.

Best regards,
Akkula.

[uzbek2012]

I have but one burning question. Will Turkey make the cut this time?

I cannot make promises that are hard to fulfill. Turkey would trigger a chain reaction as it would force me to add Armenia, Syria, modern Irak, Azerbaijan and so on.... an nice workload addition
May don't worry, I am already working on the new features which I will announce soon.

Best regards,
Akkula.

https://en.ppt-online.org/753908

We believe in you friend you are our only hope to play modern conflicts on your favorite game )
We will have to duplicate the units )
Moreover, these nations are fighting either with NATO weapons or with the former Soviet (now Russian )

https://fishki.net/anti/2195801-v-sirii ... hnika.html
https://news.rambler.ru/world/31334833- ... y-tehniki/
https://konsul-777-999.livejournal.com/9183318.html
https://en.topwar.ru/107389-spisannaya- ... sirii.html

Coastal missile complex "Redoubt"
https://en.topwar.ru/93335-beregovoy-ra ... redut.html

Crimea-Balaklava with its unique Balaklava Bay,
https://flot.com/blog/piton56/raskrytye ... aklavy.php

The Utes coastal missile mine complex has been restored in Crimea"
https://starcom68.livejournal.com/2172494.html

Earlier it was reported that the topic of sending new Russian T-14 Armata tanks to Syria is widely discussed in the Western media, with an emphasis on the fact that the Kremlin "has long been using the Syrian conflict as a testing ground for new weapons and other military equipment." The fact that the T-14 will be tested in the SAR, it became known from the words of the Minister of Industry and Trade of Russia Denis Manturov. On April 19, he reported on the Rossiya-1 TV channel that " Armata tanks were used in the field in Syria." He did not give details about when and where the tests were conducted in Syria, how many tanks were involved in total, and what exactly the tests consisted of.
Learn more: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2020/04/29/ ... nsporterov

Xi Jinping is very unhappy that his troops are not yet in the great modern mod )
https://politexpert.net/251975-sivkov-k ... vykh-raket

P.s. Builders vs. Special Forces, or Grenada Disgrace
https://en.topwar.ru/106373-stroiteli-p ... ische.html
Cuban BTR-60 with 100 mm gun
https://zen.yandex.ru/media/alternathis ... 444e881460

Turkey fears that the actions of the West could lead to a Second Crimean War
https://voennoedelo.com/posts/id13520-z ... q4jbiwmmbs

Well, against the background of the shameful flight of America and NATO from Afghanistan, it is useless to open a new front ) And then we have Albania in the mod , but there is no Taliban )))
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/super-tucano/
https://zloy-odessit.livejournal.com/2926069.html
https://en.topwar.ru/176446-boevoe-prim ... ucano.html
http://zonwar.ru/news3/news_573_EMB-314 ... ucano.html
http://factmil.com/stuff/vvs/shturmovik ... 19-1-0-357

[grau81]

Good! BTW don't you intend to change the region again and do some hypotetical campaigns witht he involment of China, something like in the "People's General" classic?

It would be really great to create another Pacific modern conflicts mode with coalition of USA, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and Australia on one, and China Russia and North Korea on the other side.

[uzbek2012]

Good! BTW don't you intend to change the region again and do some hypotetical campaigns witht he involment of China, something like in the "People's General" classic?

It would be really great to create another Pacific modern conflicts mode with coalition of USA, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and Australia on one, and China Russia and North Korea on the other side.

You can make a battle between Israel and the Arab Coalition
Tanks of the Six-Day War: IS-3 and T-34-85 against the American M48 Patton
https://en.topwar.ru/117273-shest-dney- ... iciyu.html

https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/ ... _tanks.php


You can also have the Korean War ) North Korea , China , and, to a limited extent, the USSR against NATO participated there in general )
https://www.pinterest.ru/pin/550705860660288151/

[Akkula]

Good! BTW don't you intend to change the region again and do some hypotetical campaigns witht he involment of China, something like in the "People's General" classic?

It would be really great to create another Pacific modern conflicts mode with coalition of USA, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and Australia on one, and China Russia and North Korea on the other side.

That would be amazing and I would love it. But that implies A LOT of work that would pause the updates for a while and right now I am already working on 1.6.
BUT I am not saying NO. I really want to work on the Asian "front" as soon as I can

Good! BTW don't you intend to change the region again and do some hypotetical campaigns witht he involment of China, something like in the "People's General" classic?

It would be really great to create another Pacific modern conflicts mode with coalition of USA, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and Australia on one, and China Russia and North Korea on the other side.

You can make a battle between Israel and the Arab Coalition
Tanks of the Six-Day War: IS-3 and T-34-85 against the American M48 Patton
https://en.topwar.ru/117273-shest-dney- ... iciyu.html

https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/ ... _tanks.php


You can also have the Korean War ) North Korea , China , and, to a limited extent, the USSR against NATO participated there in general )
https://www.pinterest.ru/pin/550705860660288151/

That would be go back too much in history regarding the mod time periods. I think I could go as much as the Vietnam war with the material I already have.
But as I said above, one step at the time

[uzbek2012]

Good! BTW don't you intend to change the region again and do some hypotetical campaigns witht he involment of China, something like in the "People's General" classic?

It would be really great to create another Pacific modern conflicts mode with coalition of USA, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and Australia on one, and China Russia and North Korea on the other side.

That would be amazing and I would love it. But that implies A LOT of work that would pause the updates for a while and right now I am already working on 1.6.
BUT I am not saying NO. I really want to work on the Asian "front" as soon as I can

It would be really great to create another Pacific modern conflicts mode with coalition of USA, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and Australia on one, and China Russia and North Korea on the other side.

You can make a battle between Israel and the Arab Coalition
Tanks of the Six-Day War: IS-3 and T-34-85 against the American M48 Patton
https://en.topwar.ru/117273-shest-dney- ... iciyu.html

https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/ ... _tanks.php


You can also have the Korean War ) North Korea , China , and, to a limited extent, the USSR against NATO participated there in general )
https://www.pinterest.ru/pin/550705860660288151/

That would be go back too much in history regarding the mod time periods. I think I could go as much as the Vietnam war with the material I already have.
But as I said above, one step at the time

https://vietnamix.
What will ever happen about Vietnam is pleasing )

The first socialist war.
https://anaga.ru/kitaisko-vietnamskaya-voina.htm

The Vietnamese army is on the list of the strongest in the world

Vietnam was among the twenty countries with the strongest armies based on the "Power Index" index, which takes into account several dozen factors.

Vietnam was on the sixteenth line, ahead of Thailand, Poland, Thailand and Brazil.

Experts estimated the defense budget of Vietnam at $ 3.4 billion, noting the 548,8500 people who are part of the army.

HI Akkula
https://antinormanist.livejournal.com/276705.html
https://477768.livejournal.com/6183301.html
https://www.bmpvsu.ru/cuba.php

P.s.

viewtopic.php?f=147&t=45470&p=820547&hilit=Cuba#p820547
You can not do something like this for a single scenario !? )
https://army-news.info/2016/07/kuba-odn ... -oruzhiya/
https://warfor.me/kompleks-luna-m/
https://format72.ru/viewtopic.php?t=1557
https://en.topwar.ru/29029-kubinskaya-b ... tr-60.html


https://peoplesgeneral.de/

[grau81]

It would be also interesting to implement a feature from Pacific general that ships can attack airplanes; and it would be also interesting to include cruise and ballistic missiles, and why not even hypersonic weapons?

[uzbek2012]

Well, is there any news on mod or silence

https://zen.yandex.ru/media/d1als/zahva ... 1985b86edb





https://ru.rbth.com/watch/947-soviet-vietnam-veterans



http://zonwar.ru/news4/news_628_T-34C-1 ... entor.html


http://zonwar.ru/news3/news_573_EMB-314 ... ucano.html

[Shoughie]

I just got around to finishing both sides of the big Europe scenario, I enjoyed them both. Russia is still definitely harder than NATO for me. Overall it’s much more polished and I didn’t encounter any bugs at all this time. Amazing work, and thank you.

[grau81]

Agreed, a pro-Russian Syria is a logical choice. And Turkey being the wild card also makes a lot of sense. (Inb4 the question of Armenia and Azerbaijan?)

If we take into consideration neo-ottoman and pan-turkic ambitions, it's really hard to imagine that Turkey would stay neutral in this kind of conflict.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-Turkism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Ottomanism

[grau81]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... es-surface

Lockheed F-35’s Tally of Flaws Tops 800 as ‘New Issues’ Surface




Lockheed Martin Corp.’s F-35 jet remains marred by more than 800 unresolved software and hardware deficiencies of varying severity that could undercut readiness, missions or maintenance, according to updated statistics released Tuesday by the Pentagon’s testing office and Congress’s watchdog agency.

The number of “open deficiencies,” which include eight in the most serious Category 1, hasn’t improved significantly since the fighter’s development and demonstration phase ended in April 2018 “because testing continues to discover new issues,” Raymond O’Toole Jr., the acting head of the testing office, said in a statement to a House Armed Services subcommittee.

The 864 deficiencies pending last month “is slightly lower than the 872 we reported in March 2021,” Jon Ludwigson, a Government Accountability Office director said in a separate statement. More than 670 aircraft out of a potential 3,316 for U.S. services and foreign customers are operating today, with nine nations declaring that the aircraft has an initial operational capability.

“Deficiencies represent specific instances where the weapon system either does not meet requirements or where the safety, suitability, or effectiveness of the weapon system could be affected,” Ludwigson said.

Read More: F-35 Closes In on New Timeline for Combat Test

Lockheed Martin spokesman Brett Ashworth said in an email that the Bethesda, Maryland-based contractor counts seven Category 1 deficiencies “awaiting government adjudication.” He said all of them are in Category 1B -- defined as having “a critical impact on mission readiness,” training or maintenance -- but none are in Category 1A, considered potentially life-threatening.

The GAO recommended in 2018 that the Pentagon’s F-35 program office resolve all critical deficiencies before making a decision on full-rate production, the most profitable phase for a contractor. Pentagon officials agreed and “stated that the resolution of critical deficiencies identified during testing will be addressed prior to the full-rate production decision,” Ludwigson said.

“According to program officials, at least seven of these critical deficiencies will be resolved prior to the completion of operational testing,” Ludwigson said.

Separately, the GAO said Lockheed already was falling behind on delivering the 158 jets that the program office was planning for this year.

“Almost all of the aircraft delivered so far in 2021 have been late, and Lockheed Martin is not projected to deliver all 158 aircraft, according to program officials,” Ludwigson said. “Although production has not met expectations to date, the F-35 program expects to produce a high number of aircraft in 2022.”

[uzbek2012]

Author are you alive there ? Is there any news ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-222E_Be ... ery_system