Hello Kronenblatt ! Well, I sent a PM to trw2264 yesterday because I had no news since friday... I hope he'll come back soon.
Ever-Green League - 300 BC: CLOSED
Moderators: kronenblatt, Field of Glory 2 Tournaments Managers
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
-
- General - King Tiger
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
pw = egl300MarcoCato75 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 27, 2021 7:05 pmChallenge accepted!ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 27, 2021 3:48 pm 7. MarcoCato75 Roman 340-281 BC (140)
is challenged by
9. ericdoman1 Ptolemaic 320-218 BC (125)![]()
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
Ok, thanks for input. Which turn are you at now?
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
I'm not sure but between 7 and 10 I believe. Thought I was away for 3 days at some point but warned him. Our units haven't clashed yet but his line is severly weakened by missile fire.
-
- Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 2:20 pm
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
Updated until here.Captainwaltersavage wrote: ↑Thu Jan 28, 2021 2:31 pmChallenge accepted
SawyerK won this battle after a hard fought conflict. The Greeks were fortunate to have survived a number of charges by the Veteran Italian Foot without disruption and then benefited from their spears wearing down their opponents after the initial shock. Thanks to CaptainWalterSavage for a good game!
Game initiated and the password is 'Bruttian'.
Last edited by SawyerK on Wed Feb 03, 2021 4:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Corporal - Strongpoint
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 3:06 pm
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
The Spanish under Angel42052 defeated the Greek incursion of their homeland led by imatson2527imatson2527 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 16, 2021 1:26 pm imatson2527 Syracusan 412-281 BC
Challenges
angel42052 Spanish (Celtiberian) 300-10 BC
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 12:47 am
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
deeter:
challenge is up!
10. deeter Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC (95)
11. klayeckles Macedonian 320-261 BC (90)
pw hoplite
challenge is up!
10. deeter Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC (95)
11. klayeckles Macedonian 320-261 BC (90)
pw hoplite
-
- General - King Tiger
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 27, 2021 7:24 pmpw = egl300MarcoCato75 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 27, 2021 7:05 pmChallenge accepted!ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 27, 2021 3:48 pm 7. MarcoCato75 Roman 340-281 BC (140)
Loses to
9. ericdoman1 Ptolemaic 320-218 BC (125)![]()
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
klayecles' challenge accepted.
Deeter
Updated until here.
Deeter
Updated until here.
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
Please note that the rules have been changed so that "No rerolls of maps are allowed".
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
- General - King Tiger
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
2. rbodleyscott Spartan 461-281 BC (185)
is challenged by
4. ericdoman1 Roman 340-281 BC with Bruttian Allies (155)
is challenged by
4. ericdoman1 Roman 340-281 BC with Bruttian Allies (155)
-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28288
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
As usually the challenged and not the challenger, I am starting to get a bit unhappy about the rule that the challenger can have allies but the challengee can't.
The challenger (who is usually lower ranked) is already getting a points advantage (although not all players avail themselves of this). He also has the choice of which player to challenge - and needn't challenge if he doesn't fancy the army lists matchup.
It seems unfair that in addition to those advantages, the challenger can offset any perceived deficiency in his army list by the use of allies, but the challenged player can't.
Overall, I think the system is weighted too much in favour of the challenger.
There doesn't appear to be any technical reason why the challenged should not be able to choose allies - the challenger can't set up the game anyway until the challenged player has agreed the challenge in writing, at which time he could specify any allies.
The challenger (who is usually lower ranked) is already getting a points advantage (although not all players avail themselves of this). He also has the choice of which player to challenge - and needn't challenge if he doesn't fancy the army lists matchup.
It seems unfair that in addition to those advantages, the challenger can offset any perceived deficiency in his army list by the use of allies, but the challenged player can't.
Overall, I think the system is weighted too much in favour of the challenger.
There doesn't appear to be any technical reason why the challenged should not be able to choose allies - the challenger can't set up the game anyway until the challenged player has agreed the challenge in writing, at which time he could specify any allies.
Richard Bodley Scott


-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
Not anymore. That FP differential was removed quite some time ago.rbodleyscott wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:13 pm The challenger (who is usually lower ranked) is already getting a points advantage (although not all players avail themselves of this).
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28288
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
Fair enough, I had not noticed, since I am not setting up my games anyway, but why does the challenger need any advantage other than the freedom to pick his challenges taking army lists into account?kronenblatt wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:30 pmNot anymore. That FP differential was removed quite some time ago.rbodleyscott wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:13 pm The challenger (who is usually lower ranked) is already getting a points advantage (although not all players avail themselves of this).
(Not that the ability for the challenged player to bring allies would make any material difference to Eric's challenge as the Spartans don't have any allies with usefully different troop types. But the challenger not being able to bring allies either would make a massive difference to the matchup.)
Anyway, what I am saying is that, in my opinion, either no allies should be allowed at all, or both players should be allowed to use them.
Richard Bodley Scott


-
- Field of Glory 2
- Posts: 28288
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
OK.ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:43 pm 2. rbodleyscott Spartan 461-281 BC (185)
is challenged by
4. ericdoman1 Roman 340-281 BC with Bruttian Allies (155)
Richard Bodley Scott


-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
He may not need any other advantage, but you could look it as a way to incentivise challenges.rbodleyscott wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:32 pmFair enough, I had not noticed, since I am not setting up my games anyway, but why does the challenger need any advantage other than the freedom to pick his challenges taking army lists into account?kronenblatt wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:30 pmNot anymore. That FP differential was removed quite some time ago.rbodleyscott wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:13 pm The challenger (who is usually lower ranked) is already getting a points advantage (although not all players avail themselves of this).
And after all, everyone is free to enjoy the advantage of allies through making challenges of his own.

kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
-
- General - King Tiger
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:43 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
Good stuff, pw = HOTTrbodleyscott wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:37 pmOK.ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:43 pm 2. rbodleyscott Spartan 461-281 BC (185)
is challenged by
4. ericdoman1 Roman 340-281 BC with Bruttian Allies (155)
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
SawyerK with the Greek Mercenary army won the battle against CaptainWalterSavage with his Bruttians after a hard fought conflict. The Greeks were fortunate to have survived a number of charges by the Veteran Italian Foot without disruption and then benefited from their spears wearing down their opponents after the initial shock. Thanks to CaptainWalterSavage for a good game!
Updated until here.
Updated until here.
-
- General - Carrier
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:17 pm
- Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
14 kronenblatt Samnite 355-272 BC 45
challenges
12 angel42052 Syracusan 412-281 BC 65
challenges
12 angel42052 Syracusan 412-281 BC 65
kronenblatt's campaign and tournament thread hub:
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643
https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108643