Anthony and Cleopatra - Later Ptomlemaic
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
Blathergut
- Field Marshal - Elefant

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:44 am
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
-
madcam2us
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"
Can you recommend an adequate figure? What is the main difference between the two? Have any pictures to share?nikgaukroger wrote:You also realy need to replace the shield with a thyreos otherwise all you have is triarii sans creasts - the Roman scutum being different to the Greek thyreosexpendablecinc wrote:
I'd go xyston but again get the whole army. Use principate roman triari with the feathers cut off at thorakitai.
Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
-
madcam2us
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"
Xystron has the following:
Scutum
http://www.xyston.com/acatalog/info_ANC_20187_SSA.html
Thueros:
http://www.xyston.com/acatalog/info_ANC_20154_SSA.html
Would one be better than the other?
Madcam
Scutum
http://www.xyston.com/acatalog/info_ANC_20187_SSA.html
Thueros:
http://www.xyston.com/acatalog/info_ANC_20154_SSA.html
Would one be better than the other?
Madcam
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
-
madcam2us
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"
expendablecinc wrote:If you get tin soldioer make sure its the whole army as they dont mix with anything. And look like smurfs.whitehorses wrote:Tin Soldier?
I'd go xyston but again get the whole army. Use principate roman triari with the feathers cut off at thorakitai.
Looking at xyston, their romans are Polybian area... What would you use for the Legionaires?
Madcam
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
-
madcam2us
- Master Sergeant - Bf 109E

- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Searching for the meaning of "Authors Intent"
What about these for the Thorakitai's from OG doing the same thing with the helmet crests?
http://oldglory15s.com/catalog/product_ ... &w=80&h=43
This way you can use their MRR range for the legionaires
Though, these are a bit on the rough side....
Madcam.
http://oldglory15s.com/catalog/product_ ... &w=80&h=43
This way you can use their MRR range for the legionaires
Though, these are a bit on the rough side....
Madcam.
There goes another crossing the Rubicon!
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
W/D/L
2008
CoA - 3/0/0
C.I. - 1/1/1
2009
Ottoman - 6/0/1
Khurasian - 3/5/2
2010
Catalan - 4/0/0
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Oddly the thyreos is better for the Thorakitai - who are just armoured Thyreophoroi after allmadcam2us wrote:Xystron has the following:
Scutum
http://www.xyston.com/acatalog/info_ANC_20187_SSA.html
Thueros:
http://www.xyston.com/acatalog/info_ANC_20154_SSA.html
Would one be better than the other?
Madcam
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Xyston.Irmin wrote: Now all i need is to find the best figures to make the list.
Don't go Tin Soldier. I have Tin Soldier Hoplites, and they are nice figures, but you're extremely restricted in what mixes with them. Pretty much only Tin Soldier mix with Tin Soldier.
Ian
Viking (15mm)
Syracusan (15mm)
Palmyran (10mm - 15mm basing)
Horse Nomad (15mm)
Syracusan (15mm)
Palmyran (10mm - 15mm basing)
Horse Nomad (15mm)
-
marioslaz
- Captain - Bf 110D

- Posts: 870
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
- Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy
I found my Nemesis! In a game I had a wonderful BG of superior Cav. I needed a CT and I rolled a double 1. I feel faint, but I remembered they were superior, so with a sarcastic smile I looked my opponent with boldness and I said "My troops are superior, so I re-roll both dice". I got 1 and 2robertthebruce wrote:There is a guy in my club who is playing this army with a lot of Poor Pikes, I think 4 Bgs of 8 poor pikes and 2 more Bgs of 8 average pikes.
Poor grade it´s not a problem for him, if he must to re-roll all the 6s, he can roll a 6s again, it´s incredible. Two weeks ago, he takes a cohesion test with -4, he roll 6 and 6, he re-roll, both dices, and get a 5 and a 6, amazing
![]()
![]()
![]()
Cheers
David
Mario Vitale
-
madaxeman
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:15 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
These are the Xyston Greek Theurophoroimadcam2us wrote:Can you recommend an adequate figure? What is the main difference between the two? Have any pictures to share?nikgaukroger wrote:You also realy need to replace the shield with a thyreos otherwise all you have is triarii sans creasts - the Roman scutum being different to the Greek thyreosexpendablecinc wrote:
I'd go xyston but again get the whole army. Use principate roman triari with the feathers cut off at thorakitai.
Madcam.
http://www.madaxeman.com/15mm/displayim ... ?pos=-1697
tim
http://www.madaxeman.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Holiday in Devon? Try https://www.thecaptainscottagebrixham.com
Other than maybe the battle of Alexandria in 30BC he probably didn't, but then I didn't say Mark Anthony was commanding just that it was an army from that periodmbsparta wrote:Not to rain on your Antony and Cleo party, but Antony wouldn't have been caught dead commanding that army when he had legions of Romans to command. My take is Antony supplied the legions and ships, Cleo supplied the cash to pay them.
Mike B
But then replaying the battle of Alexandria would be a good excuse for my troops all running away, as they surely will if I'm leading them
Current list stands at
TC
TC
TC
TC
2 BGs of Xystophorai - 4 Cv, Arm, Sup, Drilled, Lancers, Swordsmen
1 BG of Light Cavalry - 4 LH, Unp, Ave, Drilled, Javelins, L.Spear
1 BG of Galatian Cavalry - 4 Cv, Arm, Sup, Undrilled, L.Spear, Swordsmen
2 BG of Thorakatoi / Theurophoroi - 6 MF, Arm, Ave, Drilled, Off Spear
1 BG of Cretan Archers - 6 LF, Unp, Superior, Drilled, Bow
3 BG of Anthony's legionaries - 4 HF, Arm, Sup, Drilled, Imp Ft, Skilled Swordsmen
1 BG of Thracians - 6 MF, Prot, Ave, Undrilled, Heavy Weapon
1 BG of Ptolemaic javelinmen - 6 LF, Unprot, Ave, Undrilled, Javelins, Light Spear
1 BG of Ptolemaic Archers - 6 LF, Unp, Ave, Drilled, Bow
1 BG of Ptolemaic Slingers - 4 LF, Unp, Ave, Drilled, Sling
792pts
I've been looking at figures and the Donnington range looks OK for the Ptolemaic units, what would you use as the galatian cavalry and the legionaries?
TC
TC
TC
TC
2 BGs of Xystophorai - 4 Cv, Arm, Sup, Drilled, Lancers, Swordsmen
1 BG of Light Cavalry - 4 LH, Unp, Ave, Drilled, Javelins, L.Spear
1 BG of Galatian Cavalry - 4 Cv, Arm, Sup, Undrilled, L.Spear, Swordsmen
2 BG of Thorakatoi / Theurophoroi - 6 MF, Arm, Ave, Drilled, Off Spear
1 BG of Cretan Archers - 6 LF, Unp, Superior, Drilled, Bow
3 BG of Anthony's legionaries - 4 HF, Arm, Sup, Drilled, Imp Ft, Skilled Swordsmen
1 BG of Thracians - 6 MF, Prot, Ave, Undrilled, Heavy Weapon
1 BG of Ptolemaic javelinmen - 6 LF, Unprot, Ave, Undrilled, Javelins, Light Spear
1 BG of Ptolemaic Archers - 6 LF, Unp, Ave, Drilled, Bow
1 BG of Ptolemaic Slingers - 4 LF, Unp, Ave, Drilled, Sling
792pts
I've been looking at figures and the Donnington range looks OK for the Ptolemaic units, what would you use as the galatian cavalry and the legionaries?
15mm later Ptolomaics
Ancient & Modern (Donnington as was) do a very nice later Ptolemaic 15mm range based on the figures out of the Secunda Montvert book.
These would be ideal for the Caesarian Alexandrian Wars Romanized Ptolemaic armies with no pikes and all the close combat infantry as Imitation Legionary types. There are 2 versions of the legionaries in mail with the 'firemen' type plumed helmets, a couple of nice peltast types (one armoured & one unarmoured) and a 'neo-cretan' type skirmishers with the round pelta shield. There are 3 cavalry - a later 'tarantine' type LH with the small square, bossed shield, wearing a cloak: an earlier (IMO) Cleruch heavy cavalryman in a hellenistic musled breastplate with lance and a 'native' (probably with Libyan style hair) cavalryman in a mail shirt with short spear. You could use some of the standard Donnington Later Republican Legionaries mixed into one BG to represent the ex-Galbbian expedition deserters. I also use the Donnington Negro archers - in short kilt (I think they are from their Crusader range) as Meroitic LF archers (not totally correct but a colourful possibility).
There is a very interesting figure in the range (again taken from the Secunda book) of an infantryman in mail shirt, with a short sword (drawn), a cut down round top roman scutumn and the same 'libyan' style hair as the cavalry. I had though about using it to represent some of the locally recruited north africa legionaries used in Spain. Having said all that I'm not 100% sure that Secunda's interpretation of this as being an infantryman is correct, he shows clear indications of possibly being a gladiator (as he appears to have an elaborate armoured collar) - but no doubt somebody will come up with a good use for him!
It's not the worlds most exciting army but the figures look luvvely painted up en-masse, especially as you can probably justify Egyptian hieroglyphs on your standards.
Cheers
Mark
These would be ideal for the Caesarian Alexandrian Wars Romanized Ptolemaic armies with no pikes and all the close combat infantry as Imitation Legionary types. There are 2 versions of the legionaries in mail with the 'firemen' type plumed helmets, a couple of nice peltast types (one armoured & one unarmoured) and a 'neo-cretan' type skirmishers with the round pelta shield. There are 3 cavalry - a later 'tarantine' type LH with the small square, bossed shield, wearing a cloak: an earlier (IMO) Cleruch heavy cavalryman in a hellenistic musled breastplate with lance and a 'native' (probably with Libyan style hair) cavalryman in a mail shirt with short spear. You could use some of the standard Donnington Later Republican Legionaries mixed into one BG to represent the ex-Galbbian expedition deserters. I also use the Donnington Negro archers - in short kilt (I think they are from their Crusader range) as Meroitic LF archers (not totally correct but a colourful possibility).
There is a very interesting figure in the range (again taken from the Secunda book) of an infantryman in mail shirt, with a short sword (drawn), a cut down round top roman scutumn and the same 'libyan' style hair as the cavalry. I had though about using it to represent some of the locally recruited north africa legionaries used in Spain. Having said all that I'm not 100% sure that Secunda's interpretation of this as being an infantryman is correct, he shows clear indications of possibly being a gladiator (as he appears to have an elaborate armoured collar) - but no doubt somebody will come up with a good use for him!
It's not the worlds most exciting army but the figures look luvvely painted up en-masse, especially as you can probably justify Egyptian hieroglyphs on your standards.
Cheers
Mark



