Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
Moderators: Slitherine Core, Panzer Corps Moderators, Panzer Corps Design
-
- Corporal - Strongpoint
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 5:26 pm
Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
I have been enjoying Soviet Corps, but it is missing some of the better known Russian tank destroyers. I am up to Dneiper in the game and still have the AT-1. I do not see the SU-85 or the SU-100 which were both based on the T-34 chassis. They let me have the SU-122 but as an artillery/tank destroyer combo.
Also, is the Tiger the only captured piece we get? Nothing for taking other cities like in Afrika Corps or the Grand Campaign?
Also, is the Tiger the only captured piece we get? Nothing for taking other cities like in Afrika Corps or the Grand Campaign?
"It's a wasted trip baby. Nobody said nothing about locking horns with no Tigers."
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3231
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:35 am
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
You get a Fw190 at Caucasus. That's the only one I've managed so far (up to Stalingrad)
- BNC
- BNC
Ryan O'Shea - Developer - Strategic Command American Civil War
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
They are coming, although personally, the T34/85 is good enough for me.
My favorite AT is the ISU-122.
Finished the campaign w/o ever bothering with any other AT.
My favorite AT is the ISU-122.
Finished the campaign w/o ever bothering with any other AT.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3231
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:35 am
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
The SU-100 was only first used in 1944 IIRC. Forgot what the 85 looks like (and hence when it started murdering me in GC), but it is possibly a similar time.
- BNC
- BNC
Ryan O'Shea - Developer - Strategic Command American Civil War
-
- Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:43 am
- Location: Dallas TX
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
Always loved the SU-85's back in the old Panzer Blitz days. Think they were out by '43 if not a bit earlier.
-
- Corporal - Strongpoint
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 5:26 pm
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
Yes, halfway through the scenario I was able to upgrade my tank destroyers. I was surprised to see the SU-152 released before the SU-85 and SU-100. IIRC in real life the SU-85 came out in 42/43 and the SU-152 WAY later. That is what threw me off when I originally posted this. In fact they had an SU-76 before the SU-85 that was used mainly as a TD and not artillery like shown in the game. Still, it is fun and I am enjoying it.
Just dug out my book on Soviet armor and the SU-85 was developed in 1942, and put into battle in mid-1943. It used the SU-122 chassis, based on the T-34, and had an 85mm anti-tank gun fixed to it.
Just dug out my book on Soviet armor and the SU-85 was developed in 1942, and put into battle in mid-1943. It used the SU-122 chassis, based on the T-34, and had an 85mm anti-tank gun fixed to it.
"It's a wasted trip baby. Nobody said nothing about locking horns with no Tigers."
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
First Soviet AT SPGs were SU-76 and Su-122. Former was turretless light tank using barrel of 76-mm field/AT gun (known as USV or ZiS-3 as towed versions), while latter was simplified T-34 using M-30 122-mm gun as main armament. No turret there too, of course. Both went into production in the middle of 1942.
Year later SU-122 were replaced in production with SU-85, which had the same chassis, but switched from 122-mm howitzer to 85-mm cannon to improve their performance as TDs.
SU-152 production line came online in spring of 1943. Some people say SU-152 was designed as bunker-buster, while others claim it was ordered having Tigers in mind. Anyways, 152-mm HE shells, weighting 40 kg, were quite effective tool for negotiation with any opponent, be it dug in infantry, concrete bunker, 60-tonn heavily armored beast from nazi panzer zoo or several-story building.
Year later SU-122 were replaced in production with SU-85, which had the same chassis, but switched from 122-mm howitzer to 85-mm cannon to improve their performance as TDs.
SU-152 production line came online in spring of 1943. Some people say SU-152 was designed as bunker-buster, while others claim it was ordered having Tigers in mind. Anyways, 152-mm HE shells, weighting 40 kg, were quite effective tool for negotiation with any opponent, be it dug in infantry, concrete bunker, 60-tonn heavily armored beast from nazi panzer zoo or several-story building.
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3231
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:35 am
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
Lagg3 wrote: 60-tonn heavily armored beast from nazi panzer zoo

- BNC
Ryan O'Shea - Developer - Strategic Command American Civil War
-
- Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:42 am
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
They would make me a bit more co-operative!Lagg3 wrote:152-mm HE shells, weighting 40 kg, were quite effective tool for negotiation
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3231
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:35 am
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
I still have that nuke unit. I think that would be a suitable argument against the 152mm gun.
- BNC
- BNC
Ryan O'Shea - Developer - Strategic Command American Civil War
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
Nuke unit? What nuke unit?BiteNibbleChomp wrote:I still have that nuke unit. I think that would be a suitable argument against the 152mm gun.
BTW, here is a nuke shell for ya'. And note, that SU-152 actually CAN shoot it, as it was designed for ML-20, among others.

Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
SU-100 came to life in 1944 when DT-10 gun was invented. So it appears in the Budapest scenario. As for Su-85.. I don't remember, I think they're absent in the game, just like Churchills do
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3231
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:35 am
Re: Where are the SU-85 and SU-100 in Soviet Corps?
THIS nuke unitLagg3 wrote:Nuke unit? What nuke unit?BiteNibbleChomp wrote:I still have that nuke unit. I think that would be a suitable argument against the 152mm gun.
- BNC
Ryan O'Shea - Developer - Strategic Command American Civil War