First draft Early Principate army

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
Fulgrim
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:06 pm

First draft Early Principate army

Post by Fulgrim »

Im trying to get an principate list in to order. Im putting it around 100AD. I allready had 2 DBA-boxes of them and some bits and pieces and i want to see how what i have would work as it is. Here goes (note - not in "order of battle"):

IC
2xTC

Fortified Camp

4 Aux archers MF
4 Aux. foot MF with 2 supporting LF bow
4 Aux. foot MF with 2 supporting LF bow
6 Veteran Legiones (HF, superior, armoured)
6 Veteran Legiones (HF, superior, armoured)
4 LF slingers (average)
8 LF Allied archers
4 Aux Cv (superior)
4 LH Numibians
2 Light artillery

Sarmatian Ally
1TC
6 Sarmatian Cv

I feel low on Legionares but i dont want to buy new miniatures piecemeal so i hope some of you can give me some feedback on the list? it would be much appriciated!

BTW - I havent played romans in any type of tabletop game. I have been more into the helenistic scene so far.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Definitely need more legionarii IMO - a couple of 4 base BGs would fit in nicely I think. Personally I'm not keen on artillery so I'd drop them and I'm not sure about the Sarmatians either to be honest.

Whilst I understand this is what you have in lead I think it is too lightweight for a Roman army and it'd be defeated by the soft targets being taken out.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
domblas
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 698
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: Montpellier, France

Post by domblas »

imo support from light foot to legions and auxilary main beneficial is enhancing BG size and thus strenghening it from shooting and hits in close combat.

half a dice from charging mounted doesn't seem to me the main interest.

given that, i'd be reluctant to use lf support on 4 bases BG, coz it makes it 6 bases and thus still have to test if shot at by 2 hits. I'd prefer 6 bases supported with 3 bases LF thus having a 9 bases BG very solid.

ur point of view nik? i saw ur prinicpate roman army on ur website, full of 4 bases BG supported. So iguess u have different point of view.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Whilst it is still a CT test from shooting if you take 2 hits on a 6 base BG you do not get the -1 modifier for taking 1Hp2B which is a big difference.

Also they last longer in melee.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Fulgrim
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:06 pm

Post by Fulgrim »

Thanks for the feedback!

How about the generals? Id like to have an IC, but the cost is gruesome..

I will go over the list again with another perspektive, think im still seleucided :wink:
Scrumpy
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: NoVa

Post by Scrumpy »

At first glance 80 pts for an IC does seem a lot. But given their abilities, 12" command radius and extra + to morale, cmt & initiative, they are worth their weight in gold.

Just don't let them fight if you don't have to.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

Fulgrim wrote:How about the generals? Id like to have an IC, but the cost is gruesome..
I really think an IC is a waste of points in a Principate Roman army. The extra cohesion modiefer vs shooting isnt really needed, and you are better off with a low pre-battle initiative so you get to move first.

More legionaries!
Fulgrim
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:06 pm

Post by Fulgrim »

rbodleyscott wrote:
Fulgrim wrote:How about the generals? Id like to have an IC, but the cost is gruesome..
I really think an IC is a waste of points in a Principate Roman army. The extra cohesion modiefer vs shooting isnt really needed, and you are better off with a low pre-battle initiative so you get to move first.

More legionaries!
Thanks! I one player at the club vouches for 4 TC:s, but i really like having som quality at the helm.. 1 FC and 2 TC?
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

Fulgrim wrote:
rbodleyscott wrote:
Fulgrim wrote:How about the generals? Id like to have an IC, but the cost is gruesome..
I really think an IC is a waste of points in a Principate Roman army. The extra cohesion modiefer vs shooting isnt really needed, and you are better off with a low pre-battle initiative so you get to move first.

More legionaries!
Thanks! I one player at the club vouches for 4 TC:s, but i really like having som quality at the helm.. 1 FC and 2 TC?
Nah. 4 TCs for the win. And make sure you don't have 10 bases of LH/Cavalry. You want a PBI of 0.
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”