Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
I seem to remember if this happens you fight them next turn Is that right? If so would that be as impact or melee?
Last edited by Eques on Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing
Yes you fight the new enemy next turn in the impact phase.
-
bbotus
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing
V2 reference is page 116-117.zoltan wrote:Yes you fight the new enemy next turn in the impact phase.
Also, if the new enemy is fragmented, they take an immediate cohesion test; if required.
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing
What's an example of a fragmented bg not being required to take an immediate cohesion test when hit by a pursuing enemy?bbotus wrote:V2 reference is page 116-117.zoltan wrote:Yes you fight the new enemy next turn in the impact phase.
Also, if the new enemy is fragmented, they take an immediate cohesion test; if required.
-
bbotus
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing
If light foot are pursuing and they choose not to halt 1 MU from the fragmented BG (page 116), no CT would be required.zoltan wrote:What's an example of a fragmented bg not being required to take an immediate cohesion test when hit by a pursuing enemy?bbotus wrote:V2 reference is page 116-117.zoltan wrote:Yes you fight the new enemy next turn in the impact phase.
Also, if the new enemy is fragmented, they take an immediate cohesion test; if required.
-
zoltan
- Captain - Heavy Cruiser

- Posts: 901
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing
LF can not charge unbroken non skirmishers in open terrain so I guess you are thinking about LF pursuing into fragmented non skirmishers in rough/difficult terrain?bbotus wrote:If light foot are pursuing and they choose not to halt 1 MU from the fragmented BG (page 116), no CT would be required.
Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
Thanks Zoltan for all the replies.
-
bbotus
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing
Correct on both counts. In addition pursuits are a little different than declared charges. Pursuits are a required move. Page 116 says that LF can always choose to halt their pursuit. It doesn't say they have to. And it goes on the say fragmented contacted by pursuers must take an immediate CT unless the pursuers are LF. It says nothing about LF pursuers being required to stop if in open terrain.zoltan wrote:LF can not charge unbroken non skirmishers in open terrain so I guess you are thinking about LF pursuing into fragmented non skirmishers in rough/difficult terrain?bbotus wrote:If light foot are pursuing and they choose not to halt 1 MU from the fragmented BG (page 116), no CT would be required.
Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing
Pursuits aren't a required move all the time - it is not compulsory to pursue in certain circumstances and in some circumstances you need to take a test to pursue.bbotus wrote:Correct on both counts. In addition pursuits are a little different than declared charges. Pursuits are a required move. Page 116 says that LF can always choose to halt their pursuit. It doesn't say they have to. And it goes on the say fragmented contacted by pursuers must take an immediate CT unless the pursuers are LF. It says nothing about LF pursuers being required to stop if in open terrain.zoltan wrote:LF can not charge unbroken non skirmishers in open terrain so I guess you are thinking about LF pursuing into fragmented non skirmishers in rough/difficult terrain?bbotus wrote:If light foot are pursuing and they choose not to halt 1 MU from the fragmented BG (page 116), no CT would be required.
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
bbotus
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
The words on page 107 are: "An unbroken BG,..., always pursues ... unless: ..." Granted it does give a few exceptions. But, if a LF BG, doesn't meet one of those exceptions, then it must pursue even if you don't want it to. Sounds compulsory to me.
-
ravenflight
- Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am
Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
Not necessarily true. Unless changed from V1 (please confirm all you v2 types) a pursuit that happens in the impact phase gets fought straight away. Less likely to happen, but has happened to me several times.Eques wrote:I seem to remember if this happens you fight them next turn Is that right? If so would that be as impact or melee?
Last edited by ravenflight on Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
petedalby
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
Correct. So you can have 2 or more rounds of impact with the same BG - worked for me a few times this weekend.Not neccessarily true. Unless changed from V1 (please confirm all you v2 types) a pursuit that happens in the impact phase gets fougt straight away. Less likely to happen, but has happened to me several times.
Pete
-
bbotus
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
Agree. V2 specifically states this in the last bullet on page 116.petedalby wrote:Correct. So you can have 2 or more rounds of impact with the same BG - worked for me a few times this weekend.Not neccessarily true. Unless changed from V1 (please confirm all you v2 types) a pursuit that happens in the impact phase gets fougt straight away. Less likely to happen, but has happened to me several times.
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
But any BG can always test so as not to contact new enemybbotus wrote:The words on page 107 are: "An unbroken BG,..., always pursues ... unless: ..." Granted it does give a few exceptions. But, if a LF BG, doesn't meet one of those exceptions, then it must pursue even if you don't want it to. Sounds compulsory to me.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
bbotus
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing
Yes, they do have that option.philqw78 wrote:But any BG can always test so as not to contact new enemybbotus wrote:The words on page 107 are: "An unbroken BG,..., always pursues ... unless: ..." Granted it does give a few exceptions. But, if a LF BG, doesn't meet one of those exceptions, then it must pursue even if you don't want it to. Sounds compulsory to me.

