Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
Eques
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 374
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:50 am

Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

Post by Eques »

I seem to remember if this happens you fight them next turn Is that right? If so would that be as impact or melee?
Last edited by Eques on Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing

Post by zoltan »

Yes you fight the new enemy next turn in the impact phase.
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing

Post by bbotus »

zoltan wrote:Yes you fight the new enemy next turn in the impact phase.
V2 reference is page 116-117.

Also, if the new enemy is fragmented, they take an immediate cohesion test; if required.
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing

Post by zoltan »

bbotus wrote:
zoltan wrote:Yes you fight the new enemy next turn in the impact phase.
V2 reference is page 116-117.

Also, if the new enemy is fragmented, they take an immediate cohesion test; if required.
What's an example of a fragmented bg not being required to take an immediate cohesion test when hit by a pursuing enemy?
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing

Post by bbotus »

zoltan wrote:
bbotus wrote:
zoltan wrote:Yes you fight the new enemy next turn in the impact phase.
V2 reference is page 116-117.

Also, if the new enemy is fragmented, they take an immediate cohesion test; if required.
What's an example of a fragmented bg not being required to take an immediate cohesion test when hit by a pursuing enemy?
If light foot are pursuing and they choose not to halt 1 MU from the fragmented BG (page 116), no CT would be required.
zoltan
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Captain - Heavy Cruiser
Posts: 901
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing

Post by zoltan »

bbotus wrote:If light foot are pursuing and they choose not to halt 1 MU from the fragmented BG (page 116), no CT would be required.
LF can not charge unbroken non skirmishers in open terrain so I guess you are thinking about LF pursuing into fragmented non skirmishers in rough/difficult terrain?
Eques
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL
Posts: 374
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:50 am

Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

Post by Eques »

Thanks Zoltan for all the replies.
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing

Post by bbotus »

zoltan wrote:
bbotus wrote:If light foot are pursuing and they choose not to halt 1 MU from the fragmented BG (page 116), no CT would be required.
LF can not charge unbroken non skirmishers in open terrain so I guess you are thinking about LF pursuing into fragmented non skirmishers in rough/difficult terrain?
Correct on both counts. In addition pursuits are a little different than declared charges. Pursuits are a required move. Page 116 says that LF can always choose to halt their pursuit. It doesn't say they have to. And it goes on the say fragmented contacted by pursuers must take an immediate CT unless the pursuers are LF. It says nothing about LF pursuers being required to stop if in open terrain.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: Hitting a new eneny while pursuing

Post by dave_r »

bbotus wrote:
zoltan wrote:
bbotus wrote:If light foot are pursuing and they choose not to halt 1 MU from the fragmented BG (page 116), no CT would be required.
LF can not charge unbroken non skirmishers in open terrain so I guess you are thinking about LF pursuing into fragmented non skirmishers in rough/difficult terrain?
Correct on both counts. In addition pursuits are a little different than declared charges. Pursuits are a required move. Page 116 says that LF can always choose to halt their pursuit. It doesn't say they have to. And it goes on the say fragmented contacted by pursuers must take an immediate CT unless the pursuers are LF. It says nothing about LF pursuers being required to stop if in open terrain.
Pursuits aren't a required move all the time - it is not compulsory to pursue in certain circumstances and in some circumstances you need to take a test to pursue.
Evaluator of Supremacy
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

Post by bbotus »

The words on page 107 are: "An unbroken BG,..., always pursues ... unless: ..." Granted it does give a few exceptions. But, if a LF BG, doesn't meet one of those exceptions, then it must pursue even if you don't want it to. Sounds compulsory to me.
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

Post by ravenflight »

Eques wrote:I seem to remember if this happens you fight them next turn Is that right? If so would that be as impact or melee?
Not necessarily true. Unless changed from V1 (please confirm all you v2 types) a pursuit that happens in the impact phase gets fought straight away. Less likely to happen, but has happened to me several times.
Last edited by ravenflight on Tue Aug 13, 2013 10:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

Post by petedalby »

Not neccessarily true. Unless changed from V1 (please confirm all you v2 types) a pursuit that happens in the impact phase gets fougt straight away. Less likely to happen, but has happened to me several times.
Correct. So you can have 2 or more rounds of impact with the same BG - worked for me a few times this weekend.
Pete
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

Post by bbotus »

petedalby wrote:
Not neccessarily true. Unless changed from V1 (please confirm all you v2 types) a pursuit that happens in the impact phase gets fougt straight away. Less likely to happen, but has happened to me several times.
Correct. So you can have 2 or more rounds of impact with the same BG - worked for me a few times this weekend.
Agree. V2 specifically states this in the last bullet on page 116.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

Post by philqw78 »

bbotus wrote:The words on page 107 are: "An unbroken BG,..., always pursues ... unless: ..." Granted it does give a few exceptions. But, if a LF BG, doesn't meet one of those exceptions, then it must pursue even if you don't want it to. Sounds compulsory to me.
But any BG can always test so as not to contact new enemy
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Re: Hitting a new enemy while pursuing

Post by bbotus »

philqw78 wrote:
bbotus wrote:The words on page 107 are: "An unbroken BG,..., always pursues ... unless: ..." Granted it does give a few exceptions. But, if a LF BG, doesn't meet one of those exceptions, then it must pursue even if you don't want it to. Sounds compulsory to me.
But any BG can always test so as not to contact new enemy
Yes, they do have that option.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”