portable defense

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
franck
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:08 pm

portable defense

Post by franck »

Do we consider the PD as a whole, or each base is to be considered ?

In a concrete exemple , a 6 archers unit, in column, can place a 1-base stake.
Assuming the BG then moves, and losses this stake, does he still have 2-bases stakes remaining ?

franck
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: portable defense

Post by philqw78 »

I suppose so
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Re: portable defense

Post by hazelbark »

Don't listen to Phil on this. I think it is commonly ruled that it all or nothing.

I am not saying you're question or even Phil's response are il logical. But this was debated on a thread some time back and I "think" the author or some one had the opposite view based on some wording in the rules.

The argument in part for dis-allowing is to end gamey moves. Which could conceivably happen.
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Re: portable defense

Post by gozerius »

The BG has sufficient stakes to cover the frontage of a 2 deep formation. If it places stakes, they must be picked up before moving or the BG loses its stakes capability.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: portable defense

Post by philqw78 »

If it places stakes, they must be picked up before moving or the BG loses its stakes capability.
So a BG with 8 bases is 3 wide and places PO. It then expands whilst in combat. What happens to the PO?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: portable defense

Post by dave_r »

philqw78 wrote:
If it places stakes, they must be picked up before moving or the BG loses its stakes capability.
So a BG with 8 bases is 3 wide and places PO. It then expands whilst in combat. What happens to the PO?
The battle group has not made a manoever in the movement phase, therefore the PO's stay put. The bases that expand do not "take" PO's with them.
Evaluator of Supremacy
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: portable defense

Post by philqw78 »

And can't put any down until the rest of the BG pick theirs up
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: portable defense

Post by dave_r »

philqw78 wrote:And can't put any down until the rest of the BG pick theirs up
You can always put more down as long as the enemy they were fighting have gone away.
Evaluator of Supremacy
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: portable defense

Post by philqw78 »

dave_r wrote:
philqw78 wrote:And can't put any down until the rest of the BG pick theirs up
You can always put more down as long as the enemy they were fighting have gone away.
A BG that has placed and not picked up its PD cannot place any more. Its in the rules Dave.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Re: portable defense

Post by dave_r »

philqw78 wrote:
dave_r wrote:
philqw78 wrote:And can't put any down until the rest of the BG pick theirs up
You can always put more down as long as the enemy they were fighting have gone away.
A BG that has placed and not picked up its PD cannot place any more. Its in the rules Dave.
Where?
Evaluator of Supremacy
bbotus
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
Location: Alaska

Re: portable defense

Post by bbotus »

Where?
Page 121 very last sentence on the page (Phil almost quoted it in entirety) : "A BG that has placed and not picked up its PD cannot place more PD." It doesn't matter whether the BG expands or moves or stays stationary as that is not a requirement of the rule.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: portable defense

Post by philqw78 »

DaveR wrote:Where?
In the bit of the rules about PD.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Re: portable defense

Post by hazelbark »

philqw78 wrote:
DaveR wrote:Where?
In the bit of the rules about PD.
Clearly his visit to New England taught Dave nothing. He still refuses to read the rules and learn the game.

:lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”