portable defense
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
portable defense
Do we consider the PD as a whole, or each base is to be considered ?
In a concrete exemple , a 6 archers unit, in column, can place a 1-base stake.
Assuming the BG then moves, and losses this stake, does he still have 2-bases stakes remaining ?
franck
In a concrete exemple , a 6 archers unit, in column, can place a 1-base stake.
Assuming the BG then moves, and losses this stake, does he still have 2-bases stakes remaining ?
franck
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: portable defense
I suppose so
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Re: portable defense
Don't listen to Phil on this. I think it is commonly ruled that it all or nothing.
I am not saying you're question or even Phil's response are il logical. But this was debated on a thread some time back and I "think" the author or some one had the opposite view based on some wording in the rules.
The argument in part for dis-allowing is to end gamey moves. Which could conceivably happen.
I am not saying you're question or even Phil's response are il logical. But this was debated on a thread some time back and I "think" the author or some one had the opposite view based on some wording in the rules.
The argument in part for dis-allowing is to end gamey moves. Which could conceivably happen.
Re: portable defense
The BG has sufficient stakes to cover the frontage of a 2 deep formation. If it places stakes, they must be picked up before moving or the BG loses its stakes capability.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: portable defense
So a BG with 8 bases is 3 wide and places PO. It then expands whilst in combat. What happens to the PO?If it places stakes, they must be picked up before moving or the BG loses its stakes capability.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: portable defense
The battle group has not made a manoever in the movement phase, therefore the PO's stay put. The bases that expand do not "take" PO's with them.philqw78 wrote:So a BG with 8 bases is 3 wide and places PO. It then expands whilst in combat. What happens to the PO?If it places stakes, they must be picked up before moving or the BG loses its stakes capability.
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: portable defense
And can't put any down until the rest of the BG pick theirs up
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: portable defense
You can always put more down as long as the enemy they were fighting have gone away.philqw78 wrote:And can't put any down until the rest of the BG pick theirs up
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: portable defense
A BG that has placed and not picked up its PD cannot place any more. Its in the rules Dave.dave_r wrote:You can always put more down as long as the enemy they were fighting have gone away.philqw78 wrote:And can't put any down until the rest of the BG pick theirs up
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: portable defense
Where?philqw78 wrote:A BG that has placed and not picked up its PD cannot place any more. Its in the rules Dave.dave_r wrote:You can always put more down as long as the enemy they were fighting have gone away.philqw78 wrote:And can't put any down until the rest of the BG pick theirs up
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
bbotus
- Sergeant Major - SdKfz 234/2 8Rad

- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am
- Location: Alaska
Re: portable defense
Page 121 very last sentence on the page (Phil almost quoted it in entirety) : "A BG that has placed and not picked up its PD cannot place more PD." It doesn't matter whether the BG expands or moves or stays stationary as that is not a requirement of the rule.Where?
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: portable defense
In the bit of the rules about PD.DaveR wrote:Where?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Re: portable defense
Clearly his visit to New England taught Dave nothing. He still refuses to read the rules and learn the game.philqw78 wrote:In the bit of the rules about PD.DaveR wrote:Where?


