UK Rankings are changing
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Ghaznavid, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
UK Rankings are changing
Latest Truth from The BHGS (The Society)
The Rankings have always been the official means of evaluating player supremacy. Recent quantitative and authoritative analysis has proven this. The system will never be changed.
It is The Committee’s role to remind you that it is your duty to attend four Ranking competitions to obtain your Ranking. It is acknowledged that all virtuous Society members should attend more competitions knowing that only their greatest four results will be brought to the attention of The Society.
In August, when The Committee next presents itself to the Society, the Inner Society will present awards to those it deems meritorious through their ascendancy.
All shall pay homage to The Society. All Societies are equal.
Dave Ruddock
Evaluator of supremacy
The Rankings have always been the official means of evaluating player supremacy. Recent quantitative and authoritative analysis has proven this. The system will never be changed.
It is The Committee’s role to remind you that it is your duty to attend four Ranking competitions to obtain your Ranking. It is acknowledged that all virtuous Society members should attend more competitions knowing that only their greatest four results will be brought to the attention of The Society.
In August, when The Committee next presents itself to the Society, the Inner Society will present awards to those it deems meritorious through their ascendancy.
All shall pay homage to The Society. All Societies are equal.
Dave Ruddock
Evaluator of supremacy
Evaluator of Supremacy
Re: UK Rankings are changing
An alternative "corporate" version is here:
Following analysis carried out on the rankings it is appreciated that the rankings as they stand are not fit for purpose. It is seen as difficult to obtain a "full" ranking and therefore the rankings as a whole don't portray an accurate reflection of player abilities. Due to the diversity and multitude of rule sets currently attracting tournament players there are only a small percentage of players achieving a full ranking.
In order to solve this issue there will be changes made to how the rankings are calculated. Namely:
The number of tournaments required for a full ranking will be reduced from six to four
This will enable more people to gain a full ranking and hence the Rankings to more accurately reflect each player’s ability
Only a players best four tournaments will count towards the rankings
Will give players an option to try new and different armies without having a detrimental effect on that players ranking
Amend the end point of the ranking year to be following Britcon
Britcon is the biggest and best attended competition of the year therefore awarding the prize at Britcon makes sense
Following analysis carried out on the rankings it is appreciated that the rankings as they stand are not fit for purpose. It is seen as difficult to obtain a "full" ranking and therefore the rankings as a whole don't portray an accurate reflection of player abilities. Due to the diversity and multitude of rule sets currently attracting tournament players there are only a small percentage of players achieving a full ranking.
In order to solve this issue there will be changes made to how the rankings are calculated. Namely:
The number of tournaments required for a full ranking will be reduced from six to four
This will enable more people to gain a full ranking and hence the Rankings to more accurately reflect each player’s ability
Only a players best four tournaments will count towards the rankings
Will give players an option to try new and different armies without having a detrimental effect on that players ranking
Amend the end point of the ranking year to be following Britcon
Britcon is the biggest and best attended competition of the year therefore awarding the prize at Britcon makes sense
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
hazelbark
- General - Carrier

- Posts: 4957
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
- Location: Capital of the World !!
Re: UK Rankings are changing
Probably a good thing. As it allows people to experiment with new armies instead of just taking the same boring Bosphorans again and again and again and...oh wait let's have chinese...and a bosphoran...and now a left handed Bosphoran.
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: UK Rankings are changing
Put them up then Dave.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
Robert241167
- Lieutenant Colonel - Elite Panther D

- Posts: 1368
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:03 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: UK Rankings are changing
Hi Dave
Just a couple of questions:
- when do the new rankings start from?
- which competitions will still be worth more than others?
Thanks
Rob
Just a couple of questions:
- when do the new rankings start from?
- which competitions will still be worth more than others?
Thanks
Rob
Re: UK Rankings are changing
Robert241167 wrote:Hi Dave
Just a couple of questions:
- when do the new rankings start from?
- which competitions will still be worth more than others?
Thanks
Rob
1. Now
2. Britcon and the Challenge
Evaluator of Supremacy
-
spike
- Sergeant Major - Armoured Train

- Posts: 554
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:12 pm
- Location: Category 2
Re: UK Rankings are changing
dave_r wrote: Dave Ruddock
Evaluator of supremacy
Why does this scare me?
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do.
Benjamin Franklin
A fool and his money are soon elected.
Will Rogers
Pitty the fool!!!
Mr T
Benjamin Franklin
A fool and his money are soon elected.
Will Rogers
Pitty the fool!!!
Mr T
-
timmy1
- Lieutenant-General - Nashorn

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England
Re: UK Rankings are changing
Spike - 'Evaluator of supremacy' is Dave's specalism... He has been first loser so many times that he know how to evaluate supremacy - it is whoever is his final round opponent...

-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Re: UK Rankings are changing
So what do you evaluate in FoG(R) then Tim?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Re: UK Rankings are changing
Everybodyphilqw78 wrote:So what do you evaluate in FoG(R) then Tim?
Evaluator of Supremacy
