oucome question

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Blathergut, Slitherine Core

Post Reply
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

oucome question

Post by hazelbark »

Consider this. 1,2 are French foot. R is Russian foot. 1 is not at an angle to shoot R, but within 1 MU. It had charged and limbered artillery evaded away. But 2 is legere at 6 MU that shoots and does three hits and forces an outcome on "R" that is "retire to 3 MU if closer"
1_R

2
p 55 right column 3rd bullet implies the retire 3 MU is from "the enemy." Should this be read "all enemy" or "enemy who fired at unit"
nosher
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:33 pm

Re: oucome question

Post by nosher »

Can this happen?

(Assuming the Russian unit hasn't any accumulated cohesion in place) - all firing at medium or long range may only cause a single cohesion loss, and as the rest of the "retire to 3MU if closer or wavering" also reads "otherwise may not advance."
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Re: oucome question

Post by hazelbark »

So when i asked
p 55 right column 3rd bullet implies the retire 3 MU is from "the enemy." Should this be read "all enemy" or "enemy who fired at unit"
You are saying the later?
Astronomican
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:44 pm

Re: oucome question

Post by Astronomican »

In our games, we retire 3MU from where the shooting comes from.


Jimi
panda2
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:22 pm
Location: London

Re: oucome question

Post by panda2 »

p.65 "Retiring Units", "Units making a retire or evade move go directly away from the enemy causing them to retreat..."

So, I'd say in this case its the enemy that did the shooting and since they're already more than 3 MUs from them, there is no retreat.

If both have fired then I'd suggest they'd have to retire to be at least 3 MUs from both, but in a direction bisecting the two firing units.

Andy D
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Re: oucome question

Post by hazelbark »

panda2 wrote:p.65 "Retiring Units", "Units making a retire or evade move go directly away from the enemy causing them to retreat..."
Ahh good catch and I am commenting on that same sentence elsewhere. I agree.
terrys
Panzer Corps Team
Panzer Corps Team
Posts: 4240
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:53 am

Re: oucome question

Post by terrys »

panda2 wrote:
p.65 "Retiring Units", "Units making a retire or evade move go directly away from the enemy causing them to retreat..."

Ahh good catch and I am commenting on that same sentence elsewhere. I agree.
There are 2 units that cause the cavalry to retire:
(1) The infantry that are with 3MU
(2) The infantry that caused 3 hits.

Therefore the cavalry should retire to 3MU from the nearest enemy in a direction bisecting the anlge.
So the cavalry should wheel backwards approx 45deg and reitre to 3MU from infantry (1)
Astronomican
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:44 pm

Re: oucome question

Post by Astronomican »

Can you explain how you come to the decision that both units affect the retiring unit when only one caused any hits?


Jimi
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5291
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Re: oucome question

Post by deadtorius »

Does seem to contradict what is written. I understood it also that the shooters determined the direction of a retire move.
terrys
Panzer Corps Team
Panzer Corps Team
Posts: 4240
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:53 am

Re: oucome question

Post by terrys »

Can you explain how you come to the decision that both units affect the retiring unit when only one caused any hits?

OK - It's not entirely clear but:

Page 55: RH column 3rd Bullet point:
A unit forced to retire to 3MU from the enemy must move the minimum distance to do so. the may make a free wheel forwards or backwards.

The criteria is "from the enemy" - NOT "from the firers"
Therefore the cavalry MUST retreat so that they are not longer within 3MU of the enemy, which includes the unit number (1) in your example.
Astronomican
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:44 pm

Re: oucome question

Post by Astronomican »

Another one for the errata, methinks.


Jimi
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Re: oucome question

Post by hazelbark »

I thnk this is another good one for the FAQ.

Outcome "from enemy" means all enemy not just firer.
terrys
Panzer Corps Team
Panzer Corps Team
Posts: 4240
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:53 am

Re: oucome question

Post by terrys »

I thnk this is another good one for the FAQ.

Outcome "from enemy" means all enemy not just firer.
Agreed.
One of those situations where we've played it that way from the start, so didn't realise the wording wasn't clear enough..
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5291
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Re: oucome question

Post by deadtorius »

"From all enemy units within 3MU" might be clearer
Chasseur
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 544
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:42 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: oucome question

Post by Chasseur »

Hi Terry,

What happens if it is not possible to retreat 3MU from all enemy units, because of the position of the enemy units? Does the unit then just retreat from the firing unit(s) and ignore the other, or does it surrender or drop a Cohesion?

Cheers,
John Shaw
terrys
Panzer Corps Team
Panzer Corps Team
Posts: 4240
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:53 am

Re: oucome question

Post by terrys »

What happens if it is not possible to retreat 3MU from all enemy units, because of the position of the enemy units? Does the unit then just retreat from the firing unit(s) and ignore the other, or does it surrender or drop a Cohesion?
You'd have to almost entirely surrounded.
In this case you have to move as far away as you can fro each enemy unit and stay there.
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”