8 Matches, 4 Commanders in Close Combat for Match at least, Results: 0 Death Commanders.
Somebody Thinks that it´s very hard to kill a General in Colse Combat???
Cheers
David
Commanders and Close Combat
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
robertthebruce
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
- Location: Granada, Spain.
-
robertthebruce
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:24 pm
- Location: Granada, Spain.
I ever had bad relation with the dices
, it´s very possible that my death rolls for commanders are outside the average.
But I Think that Danger/Benefit balance is absolutely possitive for commanders. All Generals move into close combat in my matches, and that is not a typical behavior for a historical Commander.
David
But I Think that Danger/Benefit balance is absolutely possitive for commanders. All Generals move into close combat in my matches, and that is not a typical behavior for a historical Commander.
David
-
jre
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 252
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:17 pm
- Location: Zaragoza, Spain
As someone who once killed all the opposing Egyptian generals and also lost 3 generals in one game (without losing), I would say that the numbers are enough to give a little danger, while avoiding that just a little bad luck would cripple a flank.
I cannot speak for the designers but the impression I have is that their intention is that you choose between having a general fighting or having it bolstering and improving no-melee CTs and CMTs. Death is not as important as the fact that a general in melee is unavailable till the pursuit ends. And a general in a losing combat against a fast enemy has quite a high probability of dying. In most important combats there will be generals on both sides, so one will lose...
José
I cannot speak for the designers but the impression I have is that their intention is that you choose between having a general fighting or having it bolstering and improving no-melee CTs and CMTs. Death is not as important as the fact that a general in melee is unavailable till the pursuit ends. And a general in a losing combat against a fast enemy has quite a high probability of dying. In most important combats there will be generals on both sides, so one will lose...
José
-
whitehorses
- Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA

- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:40 pm
robertthebruce wrote:I ever had bad relation with the dices, it´s very possible that my death rolls for commanders are outside the average.
But I Think that Danger/Benefit balance is absolutely possitive for commanders. All Generals move into close combat in my matches, and that is not a typical behavior for a historical Commander.
David
Actually quite historical for the Wars of the Roses & the 100YW - Generals were very cavalier with their lives.
At Towton, for instance, Warwick & Edward IV were both fighting in the frontline for the Yorkists.
That however does not mean I will be using Generals so recklessly in my games
Cheers,
Jer
-
malekithau
- Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad

- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:12 am
