Supporting LF

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply

Do you use supporting LF ?

Yes, often
8
20%
Only when compulsory, but would prefer not to take them
16
40%
Only when compulsory, but would prefer not to take them
16
40%
 
Total votes: 40

Polkovnik
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:16 pm

Supporting LF

Post by Polkovnik »

This relates to a discussion about supporting LF in the FOG V2 part of the forum. I was wondering how often these are used, and if they are considered worth using.
Personally I think they are only worth taking if supporting relatively expensive troops such as Legionaries or Dailami, and are never worth taking when supporting protected spearmen, as the points would be better spent on more spearmen. But I would be interested in seeing what others think.
MatthewP
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:00 pm

Post by MatthewP »

I do occasionally use them for my principate romans, but otherwise not, unless compulsory.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Re: Supporting LF

Post by nikgaukroger »

Polkovnik wrote:This relates to a discussion about supporting LF in the FOG V2 part of the forum. I was wondering how often these are used, and if they are considered worth using.
Personally I think they are only worth taking if supporting relatively expensive troops such as Legionaries or Dailami, and are never worth taking when supporting protected spearmen, as the points would be better spent on more spearmen. But I would be interested in seeing what others think.

I suspect that to get at the issue you perceive you need to be asking slightly different questions. For example I often use them with legionarii, but usually avoid them with Spearmen - I don't think your poll caters for that.

On the basis I use legionarii more than spearmen who have the option for LF supports I voted that I often use them - however, I would suggest that it does not reflect the actual situation :?
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

I did not vote as I agree with Nik's opinion.
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

In the few armies which interest me in which LF supports are available, I would rather take the LF as seperately deployed BGs if available. This gives more flexibility, increases BG count and allows normal shooting. Bear in mind that my armies usually include protected spear and poor ones at that.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
Polkovnik
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:16 pm

Re: Supporting LF

Post by Polkovnik »

nikgaukroger wrote:I suspect that to get at the issue you perceive you need to be asking slightly different questions. For example I often use them with legionarii, but usually avoid them with Spearmen - I don't think your poll caters for that.
I would have liked to put something like that in the choice of answers but it only allowed me three options.
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: Supporting LF

Post by grahambriggs »

Polkovnik wrote:
nikgaukroger wrote:I suspect that to get at the issue you perceive you need to be asking slightly different questions. For example I often use them with legionarii, but usually avoid them with Spearmen - I don't think your poll caters for that.
I would have liked to put something like that in the choice of answers but it only allowed me three options.
I've used them in a v2 test game to get 12 base Roman HF units. That's another option of value - it can be the only way to get a max size unit.
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: Supporting LF

Post by ravenflight »

grahambriggs wrote:I've used them in a v2 test game to get 12 base Roman HF units. That's another option of value - it can be the only way to get a max size unit.
Interestingly, I use them to minimise my sizes and increase the number of BG's in my Viking army.

4 Huscarles with Huscarl archers in support = 6 (minimum BG size), which means you can have 4 BG's instead of 3. It gives me a bit more flexibility in aiding my Fremen.

MUAD DIB!
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Re: Supporting LF

Post by grahambriggs »

ravenflight wrote:
grahambriggs wrote:I've used them in a v2 test game to get 12 base Roman HF units. That's another option of value - it can be the only way to get a max size unit.
Interestingly, I use them to minimise my sizes and increase the number of BG's in my Viking army.

4 Huscarles with Huscarl archers in support = 6 (minimum BG size), which means you can have 4 BG's instead of 3. It gives me a bit more flexibility in aiding my Fremen.

MUAD DIB!
Well, I suppose they do add Spice to the army...
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Re: Supporting LF

Post by ravenflight »

grahambriggs wrote:
ravenflight wrote:
grahambriggs wrote:I've used them in a v2 test game to get 12 base Roman HF units. That's another option of value - it can be the only way to get a max size unit.
Interestingly, I use them to minimise my sizes and increase the number of BG's in my Viking army.

4 Huscarles with Huscarl archers in support = 6 (minimum BG size), which means you can have 4 BG's instead of 3. It gives me a bit more flexibility in aiding my Fremen.

MUAD DIB!
Well, I suppose they do add Spice to the army...
*groan* with comments like that I believe that the worm has turned in your comedy routines.
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”