Bolstering
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Bolstering
Is bolstering compulsory if there is a general with the BG. The only bit in the rules we could find was can bolster
It may (did) lead to cheese if not compulsory as a general can go cheer a BG up for CT but then not bolster them when fighting mounted so they can give the mounted a shoeing, or at least not make them shoo
It may (did) lead to cheese if not compulsory as a general can go cheer a BG up for CT but then not bolster them when fighting mounted so they can give the mounted a shoeing, or at least not make them shoo
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
timurilenk
- Sergeant - Panzer IIC

- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 1:34 pm
- Location: MK, UK
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
Well, Mr I'lenk, I will explain the situation. It was caused by a less than scrupuluos player refusing to bolster his disrupted MF whilst they were fighting LH with an IC attached, 4 dice to 2 at evens. Now you, and others, know the truth.timurilenk wrote:I do not believe it is - perhaps it should be
I can name him if you want!
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
timurilenk
- Sergeant - Panzer IIC

- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 1:34 pm
- Location: MK, UK
That will not be necessary Mr 78 - I was present as you well knowphilqw78 wrote:Well, Mr I'lenk, I will explain the situation. It was caused by a less than scrupuluos player refusing to bolster his disrupted MF whilst they were fighting LH with an IC attached, 4 dice to 2 at evens. Now you, and others, know the truth.
I can name him if you want!
Ian Stewart - Loving FOG, but still learning
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
To preserve his anonymity then this is what his name would look like in the language of the army he was usingtimurilenk wrote:That will not be necessary Mr 78 - I was present as you well know

I can translate for anybody else though
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
timurilenk
- Sergeant - Panzer IIC

- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 1:34 pm
- Location: MK, UK
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
But he would not then be with the BG for the next cohesion test if they lost the next combat, so it would make a differencepyruse wrote:Even if bolstering were compulsory you could simply move the general a little away from the BG during the JAP if you didn't want him to bolster.
So it's pointless making it compulsory.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
The few I can think of are if you want to keep a BG there to rout it later, when charging it or when some enemy get behind, If it will get in your way when it routs from shooting. Ambush markers do not have to shoot as they are not there, yet. But shooters in a gully could keep themselves hidden from other shooters if they themselves do not.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!



