Bolstering

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Bolstering

Post by philqw78 »

Is bolstering compulsory if there is a general with the BG. The only bit in the rules we could find was can bolster

It may (did) lead to cheese if not compulsory as a general can go cheer a BG up for CT but then not bolster them when fighting mounted so they can give the mounted a shoeing, or at least not make them shoo
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
stenic
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 7:24 pm
Location: Cheltenham, Glos, UK

Post by stenic »

An interesting question. Quite pertinant to our game Monday where my Tupi were beating knights and they bounced when I railled. With hindsight not rallying might have been better. Very risky though.
timurilenk
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 1:34 pm
Location: MK, UK

Post by timurilenk »

I do not believe it is - perhaps it should be :-)
Ian Stewart - Loving FOG, but still learning
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

timurilenk wrote:I do not believe it is - perhaps it should be :-)
Well, Mr I'lenk, I will explain the situation. It was caused by a less than scrupuluos player refusing to bolster his disrupted MF whilst they were fighting LH with an IC attached, 4 dice to 2 at evens. Now you, and others, know the truth.

I can name him if you want!
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
zeitoun
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: poitiers FRANCE

Post by zeitoun »

for me it's not compulsory.

Since Bolster is after Breaking of , during the next melee phase you've got full dice to kill the LH.
Olivier Marceau
early carthage
later carthage
HWY continental
WOTR Yorkish, Tudor and Lancastre
Perses Sassanids
Francais Ordonnance
timurilenk
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 1:34 pm
Location: MK, UK

Post by timurilenk »

philqw78 wrote:Well, Mr I'lenk, I will explain the situation. It was caused by a less than scrupuluos player refusing to bolster his disrupted MF whilst they were fighting LH with an IC attached, 4 dice to 2 at evens. Now you, and others, know the truth.

I can name him if you want!
That will not be necessary Mr 78 - I was present as you well know :-)
Ian Stewart - Loving FOG, but still learning
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

timurilenk wrote:That will not be necessary Mr 78 - I was present as you well know :-)
To preserve his anonymity then this is what his name would look like in the language of the army he was using
Image
I can translate for anybody else though
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
timurilenk
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Sergeant - Panzer IIC
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 1:34 pm
Location: MK, UK

Post by timurilenk »

philqw78 wrote:Image
Spring Roll?
Ian Stewart - Loving FOG, but still learning
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

It's optional. "May" not "must"
kal5056
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:35 pm

Post by kal5056 »

Shooting is Mandatory
Bolsterin is an option.

Gino
SMAC
pyruse
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:32 am

Post by pyruse »

Even if bolstering were compulsory you could simply move the general a little away from the BG during the JAP if you didn't want him to bolster.
So it's pointless making it compulsory.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

pyruse wrote:Even if bolstering were compulsory you could simply move the general a little away from the BG during the JAP if you didn't want him to bolster.
So it's pointless making it compulsory.
But he would not then be with the BG for the next cohesion test if they lost the next combat, so it would make a difference
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Mehrunes
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Master Sergeant - U-boat
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:21 pm

Post by Mehrunes »

Why overcomplicate the (new) rules?
Just leave it as it is. In 99% you want to bolster anyway.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Changing the word can to must is hardly complex.

In fact the less choices you get the l;ess complicated life is.

"Freedom is slavery"
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
imanfasil
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: Texas

Post by imanfasil »

I have a dumb question since Gino mentioned it... why is shooting mandatory? I honestly had not noticed that in the FoG rules but it did jump out at me reading the FoG-R rules last week.

Is there some huge tactical advantage (that I'm missing) to be gained from NOT shooting?
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

The few I can think of are if you want to keep a BG there to rout it later, when charging it or when some enemy get behind, If it will get in your way when it routs from shooting. Ambush markers do not have to shoot as they are not there, yet. But shooters in a gully could keep themselves hidden from other shooters if they themselves do not.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”