CMT for part of a Battle Line

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

berthier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Contact:

Post by berthier »

Actually, I was wrong when I said battlelines never take CMTs. Went back to p. 41 and Battlelines containing Light Artillery and/or battlewagons DO have to take a CMT to do any move (4th bullet under simple and complex moves). But otherwise, I believe Graham is correct.
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

berthier wrote:Actually, I was wrong when I said battlelines never take CMTs. Went back to p. 41 and Battlelines containing Light Artillery and/or battlewagons DO have to take a CMT to do any move (4th bullet under simple and complex moves). But otherwise, I believe Graham is correct.
My apologies, I don't use those troop types so was unaware.
kal5056
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:35 pm

Post by kal5056 »

Now Graham in your example if the one BG on the far left wanted to contract while stationary and the IC is not with that BG is the roll a +2 or a plus +3.

I said +2 my opponent said +3.

Gino
SMAC
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

kal5056 wrote:Now Graham in your example if the one BG on the far left wanted to contract while stationary and the IC is not with that BG is the roll a +2 or a plus +3.

I said +2 my opponent said +3.

Gino
SMAC
It's +2 unless the IC is actually with the BG doing the contraction. A stationary contraction cannot be done as part of a Battle Line. Battle lines are limited to the advances section.
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

A general counts as "with" the entire battleline that is attemptiong to move.
For example, a BG of poor undrilled HF, a BG of average undrilled Battlewagons, and a fragged BG of superior drilled MF, with an IC attached to the MF, is attempting to move toward the enemy. It would need to CMT using the undrilled rate, would be treated as poor (reroll 6s), and get an overall +1 to the roll ( -2 for a fragged BG, +3 for an IC "with" the battleline). If it passed it could move at the battlewagon move rate and no base of any BG could enter difficult going.
Page 30 bullet 1: Severely disordered, fragmented or broken troops cannot be part of a battle line.
In your example the fragged troops can not be part of a battle line so you can't use your IC with the MF to form a battle line. All those BG's would have to make individual moves.
The general has to stay with the battle line for the entire move, he can not drop off at any point, pages 29 and 30 where it covers battle lines does not say that he counts as being with every base in the battle line.
berthier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
Posts: 782
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Contact:

Post by berthier »

deadtorius wrote: Page 30 bullet 1: Severely disordered, fragmented or broken troops cannot be part of a battle line.
In your example the fragged troops can not be part of a battle line so you can't use your IC with the MF to form a battle line. All those BG's would have to make individual moves.
The general has to stay with the battle line for the entire move, he can not drop off at any point, pages 29 and 30 where it covers battle lines does not say that he counts as being with every base in the battle line.
Actually, if you read the last sentence in the 2nd column on page 30 above the tip, you will find "The principal advantage of a battle line is that it allows multiple battlegroups to perform certain actions together as if each had a commander with it."

I tink that answers your question Gino.

Christopher Anders
kal5056
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:35 pm

Post by kal5056 »

The key word in that sentence Chris is "Together"
In my example only 1 BG was making a movement so although part of a battle line it is not makeing a move with the line so No Plus 3.
Thanks
Gino
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

deadtorius wrote:
A general counts as "with" the entire battleline that is attemptiong to move.
For example, a BG of poor undrilled HF, a BG of average undrilled Battlewagons, and a fragged BG of superior drilled MF, with an IC attached to the MF, is attempting to move toward the enemy. It would need to CMT using the undrilled rate, would be treated as poor (reroll 6s), and get an overall +1 to the roll ( -2 for a fragged BG, +3 for an IC "with" the battleline). If it passed it could move at the battlewagon move rate and no base of any BG could enter difficult going.
Page 30 bullet 1: Severely disordered, fragmented or broken troops cannot be part of a battle line.
In your example the fragged troops can not be part of a battle line so you can't use your IC with the MF to form a battle line. All those BG's would have to make individual moves.
I KNEW that was in there somewhere.
Thracians
Classical Indians
Medieval
-Germans (many flavors), Danes, Low Countries
Burgundians
In progress - Later Hungarians, Grand Moravians
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”