Scythed chariot disaster (did we do this right?)
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
stecal
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 316
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:21 am
- Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
- Contact:
Scythed chariot disaster (did we do this right?)
Regardless of the rules question this is a once in a lifetime series of mishaps involving those ever popular Pontic Scythed chariots that needs to be told.
Playing my Pontics vs LRR and a situation came up like this
Numidian LtH have shot my scythed chariots to fragmented, 3 " behind the chariots are a 6 strong allied Armenian Cataphract unit with general.
The numidians charge the fragged chariots, who fail their CT and break. The Armenians take an immediate CT for seiing friends break and drop to disrupted, the chariots rout thru the cataphracts dropping them another level to frag, the pursuing Numidians now contact into the Cataphracts causing them to take another CT for being charged when fragged and they fail and break. Did we do this right?
Let the laughter begin....
Playing my Pontics vs LRR and a situation came up like this
Numidian LtH have shot my scythed chariots to fragmented, 3 " behind the chariots are a 6 strong allied Armenian Cataphract unit with general.
The numidians charge the fragged chariots, who fail their CT and break. The Armenians take an immediate CT for seiing friends break and drop to disrupted, the chariots rout thru the cataphracts dropping them another level to frag, the pursuing Numidians now contact into the Cataphracts causing them to take another CT for being charged when fragged and they fail and break. Did we do this right?
Let the laughter begin....
Clear the battlefield and let me see
All the profit from our victory.
All the profit from our victory.
-
expendablecinc
- 2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:55 pm
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
expendablecinc wrote:Light horse dont have to test to charge fragmented troops
They have to rest to charge any Unbroken non-skirmishers frontally. Fragmented are not broken.
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
The LH presumably passed a CT to charge the chariots. This would then qualify them to charge the disrupted cataphracts. Probably rather bad news for the LH.
Ideally for the LH, the chariots needed to pass their fragmented charged test, but be routed in the impact. The LH would then have stopped short of the cataphracts in the pursuit.
Ideally for the LH, the chariots needed to pass their fragmented charged test, but be routed in the impact. The LH would then have stopped short of the cataphracts in the pursuit.
-
stecal
- Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie

- Posts: 316
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:21 am
- Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
- Contact:
Oh well, I knew it seemed pretty harsh to drop 3 levels in the impact phase without even being in combat, but i guess it is possible with bad die rolls afterall (just not due to expendable chariots)philqw78 wrote:The test to charge is a CMT surely. Failing a CT to charge would result in fragmentation for disrupted non-shock. And there is no CT for seeing Scythed Chariots go up in smoke, or down in pieces
I missed the part about ignoring the CT when scythed chariots break. I thought it was just that they didn't count as a lost BG. I am also pretty sure we didn't have the LH take a CMT to charge the fragmented chariots either.
Thanks guys
Clear the battlefield and let me see
All the profit from our victory.
All the profit from our victory.
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Scythed chariots are a bit overpriced - deliberately - for their effect on the table. They hate being shot at, so putting them in the front line with no screening doesn't work. They're a bit better if in a second wave. 30 points for 6 decent impact dice is handy, especially if you can hit something that's already disrupted.
The other use I've found for them is when you need a sacrificial BG - e'g something tough is coming round your flank. That uses the 'nobody minds if they die' special rule.
Unfortunately, both uses are unhistoric but then again I've not found any rule set that represents these troops properly.
The other use I've found for them is when you need a sacrificial BG - e'g something tough is coming round your flank. That uses the 'nobody minds if they die' special rule.
Unfortunately, both uses are unhistoric but then again I've not found any rule set that represents these troops properly.
-
shadowdragon
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier

- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
- Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada
Phil, can you please reference where it says a CT is not required for seeing a Scythed Chariot BG break? I've found nothing in the FAQ or errats, but under the section in the rules on Cohesion Tests / subsection, "Seeing Friendly Battle Gruops Break or Commander Lost", it gives an exception that "only skirmishers need test if the broken friends are skimishers". There is no exception for Scythed Chariots. The "no CT for Scythed Chariots" is only at the start of the JAP phase, where the rules say, "Scythed Chariots that remain in front edge contact with unbroken enemy they fought this turn are removed from the table at the start of the joint action phase. This does not cause any cohesion tests." "This" refers only to removing the chariots at the start of the JAP and not to other events.philqw78 wrote:The test to charge is a CMT surely. Failing a CT to charge would result in fragmentation for disrupted non-shock. And there is no CT for seeing Scythed Chariots go up in smoke, or down in pieces
Also, as I understand the beginning of the Impact rules (Declaration of Charges), the LH could not contact the cataphracts that phase as it says, "If a CMT is required to make a charge move against certain troops, it must be taken if required for any of the BG that can be "legally" contacted in the chosen direction or charge, including by stepping forward bases. It need not and cannot be taken for those that can only be contacted if another BG evades or routs." So, the LH must take a CMT to charge the chariots, but at the time of taking that CMT the cataphracts are not a legal charge target.
The sequence as I read the rules would be:
1) LH take CMT to charge chariots - successful here I presume.
2) Chariots take CT for being charged while fragmented and rout.
3) Cataphracts take CT for seeing chariots rout and become disrupted.
4) Chariots rout and disrupt cataphracts who become fragmented.
End of sequence. LH do not charge and do not pursue.
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
oooh. Interesting on SCh break and charge points. Am at work so can't look it up. But the LH will still charge.shadowdragon wrote:Phil, can you please reference where it says a CT is not required for seeing a Scythed Chariot BG break? I've found nothing in the FAQ or errats, but under the section in the rules on Cohesion Tests / subsection, "Seeing Friendly Battle Gruops Break or Commander Lost", it gives an exception that "only skirmishers need test if the broken friends are skimishers". There is no exception for Scythed Chariots. The "no CT for Scythed Chariots" is only at the start of the JAP phase, where the rules say, "Scythed Chariots that remain in front edge contact with unbroken enemy they fought this turn are removed from the table at the start of the joint action phase. This does not cause any cohesion tests." "This" refers only to removing the chariots at the start of the JAP and not to other events.
Also, as I understand the beginning of the Impact rules (Declaration of Charges), the LH could not contact the cataphracts that phase as it says, "If a CMT is required to make a charge move against certain troops, it must be taken if required for any of the BG that can be "legally" contacted in the chosen direction or charge, including by stepping forward bases. It need not and cannot be taken for those that can only be contacted if another BG evades or routs." So, the LH must take a CMT to charge the chariots, but at the time of taking that CMT the cataphracts are not a legal charge target.
The sequence as I read the rules would be:
1) LH take CMT to charge chariots - successful here I presume.
2) Chariots take CT for being charged while fragmented and rout.
3) Cataphracts take CT for seeing chariots rout and become disrupted.
4) Chariots rout and disrupt cataphracts who become fragmented.
End of sequence. LH do not charge and do not pursue.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
shadowdragon
- Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier

- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
- Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
No they hit them as they had passed the test already.
If they were charging skirmishers and didn't test, or could not as no needing to test for target was in range, they cannot then test if one comes into range after evades and VMD's either. So a bystander was heard to say.
If they were charging skirmishers and didn't test, or could not as no needing to test for target was in range, they cannot then test if one comes into range after evades and VMD's either. So a bystander was heard to say.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am




