Scythed chariot disaster (did we do this right?)

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

stecal
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:21 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Contact:

Scythed chariot disaster (did we do this right?)

Post by stecal »

Regardless of the rules question this is a once in a lifetime series of mishaps involving those ever popular Pontic Scythed chariots that needs to be told.

Playing my Pontics vs LRR and a situation came up like this

Numidian LtH have shot my scythed chariots to fragmented, 3 " behind the chariots are a 6 strong allied Armenian Cataphract unit with general.
The numidians charge the fragged chariots, who fail their CT and break. The Armenians take an immediate CT for seiing friends break and drop to disrupted, the chariots rout thru the cataphracts dropping them another level to frag, the pursuing Numidians now contact into the Cataphracts causing them to take another CT for being charged when fragged and they fail and break. Did we do this right?

Let the laughter begin....
Clear the battlefield and let me see
All the profit from our victory.
kal5056
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Sergeant First Class - Elite Panzer IIIL
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:35 pm

Post by kal5056 »

I don't think anyone cares that scythed chariots break. That is what they are there for.
All else seems correct. So you should have been disrupted and the light horse would have stopped 1 mu from your cats.
Gino
SMAC
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Shouldn't the Numidians have passed a CMT to charge unbroken battle troops?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
expendablecinc
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Elite Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:55 pm

Post by expendablecinc »

philqw78 wrote:Shouldn't the Numidians have passed a CMT to charge unbroken battle troops?
Light horse dont have to test to charge fragmented troops ir the scythed chariots so cant contact the cats in the follow through.
zeitoun
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: poitiers FRANCE

Post by zeitoun »

LH must pass a CMT to charge unbroken non skirmisher to their front . So LH, test, charge , then impact the CT .....
Olivier Marceau
early carthage
later carthage
HWY continental
WOTR Yorkish, Tudor and Lancastre
Perses Sassanids
Francais Ordonnance
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

philqw78 wrote:Shouldn't the Numidians have passed a CMT to charge unbroken battle troops?

CT isn't it, not a CMT?
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

expendablecinc wrote:Light horse dont have to test to charge fragmented troops

They have to rest to charge any Unbroken non-skirmishers frontally. Fragmented are not broken.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
zeitoun
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: poitiers FRANCE

Post by zeitoun »

but i don't think that Cataphract must test to see the Chariot broken. They are expandable so no test when they broke???
Olivier Marceau
early carthage
later carthage
HWY continental
WOTR Yorkish, Tudor and Lancastre
Perses Sassanids
Francais Ordonnance
rogerg
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 855
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Halifax, Yorkshire

Post by rogerg »

The LH presumably passed a CT to charge the chariots. This would then qualify them to charge the disrupted cataphracts. Probably rather bad news for the LH.

Ideally for the LH, the chariots needed to pass their fragmented charged test, but be routed in the impact. The LH would then have stopped short of the cataphracts in the pursuit.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

The test to charge is a CMT surely. Failing a CT to charge would result in fragmentation for disrupted non-shock. And there is no CT for seeing Scythed Chariots go up in smoke, or down in pieces
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
stecal
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 316
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:21 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Contact:

Post by stecal »

philqw78 wrote:The test to charge is a CMT surely. Failing a CT to charge would result in fragmentation for disrupted non-shock. And there is no CT for seeing Scythed Chariots go up in smoke, or down in pieces
Oh well, I knew it seemed pretty harsh to drop 3 levels in the impact phase without even being in combat, but i guess it is possible with bad die rolls afterall (just not due to expendable chariots)

I missed the part about ignoring the CT when scythed chariots break. I thought it was just that they didn't count as a lost BG. I am also pretty sure we didn't have the LH take a CMT to charge the fragmented chariots either.

Thanks guys
Clear the battlefield and let me see
All the profit from our victory.
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

philqw78 wrote:The test to charge is a CMT surely.

Yup indeed - I must have been thinking of something else :oops:
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

nikgaukroger wrote:
philqw78 wrote:The test to charge is a CMT surely.

Yup indeed - I must have been thinking of something else :oops:
FoG:R perhaps?
Evaluator of Supremacy
dreiling
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 12:34 am
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA

Post by dreiling »

So were the Scythed Chariots worth it or not?

So any LH group just blows them up?

Seems not worth it - very much like a gimmick
Never have so many bowmen shot so many arrows and done so little damage!
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

Scythed chariots are a bit overpriced - deliberately - for their effect on the table. They hate being shot at, so putting them in the front line with no screening doesn't work. They're a bit better if in a second wave. 30 points for 6 decent impact dice is handy, especially if you can hit something that's already disrupted.

The other use I've found for them is when you need a sacrificial BG - e'g something tough is coming round your flank. That uses the 'nobody minds if they die' special rule.

Unfortunately, both uses are unhistoric but then again I've not found any rule set that represents these troops properly.
shadowdragon
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada

Post by shadowdragon »

philqw78 wrote:The test to charge is a CMT surely. Failing a CT to charge would result in fragmentation for disrupted non-shock. And there is no CT for seeing Scythed Chariots go up in smoke, or down in pieces
Phil, can you please reference where it says a CT is not required for seeing a Scythed Chariot BG break? I've found nothing in the FAQ or errats, but under the section in the rules on Cohesion Tests / subsection, "Seeing Friendly Battle Gruops Break or Commander Lost", it gives an exception that "only skirmishers need test if the broken friends are skimishers". There is no exception for Scythed Chariots. The "no CT for Scythed Chariots" is only at the start of the JAP phase, where the rules say, "Scythed Chariots that remain in front edge contact with unbroken enemy they fought this turn are removed from the table at the start of the joint action phase. This does not cause any cohesion tests." "This" refers only to removing the chariots at the start of the JAP and not to other events.

Also, as I understand the beginning of the Impact rules (Declaration of Charges), the LH could not contact the cataphracts that phase as it says, "If a CMT is required to make a charge move against certain troops, it must be taken if required for any of the BG that can be "legally" contacted in the chosen direction or charge, including by stepping forward bases. It need not and cannot be taken for those that can only be contacted if another BG evades or routs." So, the LH must take a CMT to charge the chariots, but at the time of taking that CMT the cataphracts are not a legal charge target.

The sequence as I read the rules would be:
1) LH take CMT to charge chariots - successful here I presume.
2) Chariots take CT for being charged while fragmented and rout.
3) Cataphracts take CT for seeing chariots rout and become disrupted.
4) Chariots rout and disrupt cataphracts who become fragmented.

End of sequence. LH do not charge and do not pursue.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

shadowdragon wrote:Phil, can you please reference where it says a CT is not required for seeing a Scythed Chariot BG break? I've found nothing in the FAQ or errats, but under the section in the rules on Cohesion Tests / subsection, "Seeing Friendly Battle Gruops Break or Commander Lost", it gives an exception that "only skirmishers need test if the broken friends are skimishers". There is no exception for Scythed Chariots. The "no CT for Scythed Chariots" is only at the start of the JAP phase, where the rules say, "Scythed Chariots that remain in front edge contact with unbroken enemy they fought this turn are removed from the table at the start of the joint action phase. This does not cause any cohesion tests." "This" refers only to removing the chariots at the start of the JAP and not to other events.

Also, as I understand the beginning of the Impact rules (Declaration of Charges), the LH could not contact the cataphracts that phase as it says, "If a CMT is required to make a charge move against certain troops, it must be taken if required for any of the BG that can be "legally" contacted in the chosen direction or charge, including by stepping forward bases. It need not and cannot be taken for those that can only be contacted if another BG evades or routs." So, the LH must take a CMT to charge the chariots, but at the time of taking that CMT the cataphracts are not a legal charge target.

The sequence as I read the rules would be:
1) LH take CMT to charge chariots - successful here I presume.
2) Chariots take CT for being charged while fragmented and rout.
3) Cataphracts take CT for seeing chariots rout and become disrupted.
4) Chariots rout and disrupt cataphracts who become fragmented.

End of sequence. LH do not charge and do not pursue.
oooh. Interesting on SCh break and charge points. Am at work so can't look it up. But the LH will still charge.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
shadowdragon
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2048
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:29 pm
Location: Manotick, Ontario, Canada

Post by shadowdragon »

philqw78 wrote:oooh. Interesting on SCh break and charge points. Am at work so can't look it up. But the LH will still charge.
Right, the LH will still charge, the same as if the target had evaded (i.e., with a VMD)???? But would they then stop 1 MU short of the cataphracts?
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

No they hit them as they had passed the test already.

If they were charging skirmishers and didn't test, or could not as no needing to test for target was in range, they cannot then test if one comes into range after evades and VMD's either. So a bystander was heard to say.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

I'm similarly without rules but I think I remeber it being in the 'special rules' section that tells you how scythed chariots work
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”