Vasa Swedish

Private forum for design team.

Moderators: nikgaukroger, rbodleyscott, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design

Post Reply
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28398
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Vasa Swedish

Post by rbodleyscott »

This army appears to have no pikes from 1593. Can that be correct?
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Yup - one reason the Poles ran over them so easily in this period.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

Currently the list has maxima for 1593 to 1599 of 894. I am going to increase this to 1002 by adding another 18 musketer/calivermen BGs.

This will still be low, however, I'd rather not push it any further as:

(a) players do not have to choose this sub-period, and
(b) to make any more changes would mean fiddling with the number of mounted, which IMO would end up distorting the other sub-periods and they are more important I feel as they cover major wars.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28398
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

nikgaukroger wrote:Currently the list has maxima for 1593 to 1599 of 894. I am going to increase this to 1002 by adding another 18 musketer/calivermen BGs.

This will still be low, however, I'd rather not push it any further as:

(a) players do not have to choose this sub-period, and
(b) to make any more changes would mean fiddling with the number of mounted, which IMO would end up distorting the other sub-periods and they are more important I feel as they cover major wars.
OK
SirGarnet
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Brigadier-General - Elite Grenadier
Posts: 2186
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:13 am

Post by SirGarnet »

I apologize if the question was previously raised, but where are the expected Swedish feathers from the end of the century once the Swedes saw reverses at least until pikes came into general use (1604, in the list), if not thereafter for shot-only bodies of troops? I find it curious that they show up in the Gustavan list from 1624-1627 when the regiments are already protected by Pike and have been since c 1617. It would be useful to definitively address this popularly known Swedish expedient in the notes.

Thanks,

Mike
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

MikeK wrote:I apologize if the question was previously raised, but where are the expected Swedish feathers from the end of the century once the Swedes saw reverses at least until pikes came into general use (1604, in the list), if not thereafter for shot-only bodies of troops? I find it curious that they show up in the Gustavan list from 1624-1627 when the regiments are already protected by Pike and have been since c 1617. It would be useful to definitively address this popularly known Swedish expedient in the notes.

Thanks,

Mike

Fair question.

From what I've read the "swedish feathers" of the time were called "Spanish riders" (no idea why), and were used as part of a ditch/bank type defense rather than as a portable obstacle - hence thet will be part of the FF (must check I did put those in).
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Post Reply

Return to “FoGR Lists”