Vasa Swedish
Moderators: nikgaukroger, rbodleyscott, Slitherine Core, FOGR Design
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
Vasa Swedish
This army appears to have no pikes from 1593. Can that be correct?
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
Currently the list has maxima for 1593 to 1599 of 894. I am going to increase this to 1002 by adding another 18 musketer/calivermen BGs.
This will still be low, however, I'd rather not push it any further as:
(a) players do not have to choose this sub-period, and
(b) to make any more changes would mean fiddling with the number of mounted, which IMO would end up distorting the other sub-periods and they are more important I feel as they cover major wars.
This will still be low, however, I'd rather not push it any further as:
(a) players do not have to choose this sub-period, and
(b) to make any more changes would mean fiddling with the number of mounted, which IMO would end up distorting the other sub-periods and they are more important I feel as they cover major wars.
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
-
rbodleyscott
- Field of Glory 2

- Posts: 28397
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm
OKnikgaukroger wrote:Currently the list has maxima for 1593 to 1599 of 894. I am going to increase this to 1002 by adding another 18 musketer/calivermen BGs.
This will still be low, however, I'd rather not push it any further as:
(a) players do not have to choose this sub-period, and
(b) to make any more changes would mean fiddling with the number of mounted, which IMO would end up distorting the other sub-periods and they are more important I feel as they cover major wars.
I apologize if the question was previously raised, but where are the expected Swedish feathers from the end of the century once the Swedes saw reverses at least until pikes came into general use (1604, in the list), if not thereafter for shot-only bodies of troops? I find it curious that they show up in the Gustavan list from 1624-1627 when the regiments are already protected by Pike and have been since c 1617. It would be useful to definitively address this popularly known Swedish expedient in the notes.
Thanks,
Mike
Thanks,
Mike
-
nikgaukroger
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 10287
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: LarryWorld
MikeK wrote:I apologize if the question was previously raised, but where are the expected Swedish feathers from the end of the century once the Swedes saw reverses at least until pikes came into general use (1604, in the list), if not thereafter for shot-only bodies of troops? I find it curious that they show up in the Gustavan list from 1624-1627 when the regiments are already protected by Pike and have been since c 1617. It would be useful to definitively address this popularly known Swedish expedient in the notes.
Thanks,
Mike
Fair question.
From what I've read the "swedish feathers" of the time were called "Spanish riders" (no idea why), and were used as part of a ditch/bank type defense rather than as a portable obstacle - hence thet will be part of the FF (must check I did put those in).
Nik Gaukroger
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith
nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
