So how many Pilgrims should you have?

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
BlackPrince
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm

So how many Pilgrims should you have?

Post by BlackPrince »

I was checking some options for the Early Crusader army and I noticed that on page 7 of Swords and Scimitars that the starter army has one BG of Pilgrims with 6 bases. The main army list states a Pilgrim BG contains 8-12 bases which one is correct? I have assumed that as the Pilgrims are a mob then the main list is correct with a minimum of 8 bases.
Keith

It was better to leave disputing about the faith to the theologians and just run argumentative non-believers through with the sword (Louis IX).
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Hammy checked the starter lists. Experts in their field made the main lists. I know who I believe made the mistake.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

Yes, the main list is the one to use if you are designing your own army. A number of the starter armies do not comply with their main list.
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

Both are correct. If you're using the starter army you can have 6. If you're designing your own army you have to have the 8-12.

As design policy, the cheap troops in the general lists are often in large units to stop lots of little 'filler' units in an army created from those. The starter armies don't have this problem, so get more latitude as to what can be in them.
mbsparta
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:57 pm

Post by mbsparta »

I depends on how biig your turkey is. :wink:
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

philqw78 wrote:Hammy checked the starter lists. Experts in their field made the main lists. I know who I believe made the mistake.
OK, OK, mea culpa, that's another one that is my fault :cry:
pease1
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 7:59 pm
Contact:

Post by pease1 »

BURN THE WITCH!
See what I'm painting and playing on my wargaming blog: http://ajs-wargaming.blogspot.com/
BlackPrince
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm

Post by BlackPrince »

grahambriggs wrote:As design policy, the cheap troops in the general lists are often in large units to stop lots of little 'filler' units in an army created from those. The starter armies don't have this problem, so get more latitude as to what can be in them.
One rule for the Rom Dom swarm and another for the rest of us Roman "haters"
Maybe I should start painting some Romans????
Keith

It was better to leave disputing about the faith to the theologians and just run argumentative non-believers through with the sword (Louis IX).
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

BlackPrince wrote:
grahambriggs wrote:As design policy, the cheap troops in the general lists are often in large units to stop lots of little 'filler' units in an army created from those. The starter armies don't have this problem, so get more latitude as to what can be in them.
One rule for the Rom Dom swarm and another for the rest of us Roman "haters"
Maybe I should start painting some Romans????
So it would seem. Funny, everyone complains about the Dom Roms in units of 4 (me included) but doesn't complain about the republican Romans in units of 4 and 2.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

grahambriggs wrote:So it would seem. Funny, everyone complains about the Dom Roms in units of 4 (me included) but doesn't complain about the republican Romans in units of 4 and 2.
The 4's used in the proper dom swarm are faster moving and cheaper.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”