So how many Pilgrims should you have?
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
So how many Pilgrims should you have?
I was checking some options for the Early Crusader army and I noticed that on page 7 of Swords and Scimitars that the starter army has one BG of Pilgrims with 6 bases. The main army list states a Pilgrim BG contains 8-12 bases which one is correct? I have assumed that as the Pilgrims are a mob then the main list is correct with a minimum of 8 bases.
Keith
It was better to leave disputing about the faith to the theologians and just run argumentative non-believers through with the sword (Louis IX).
It was better to leave disputing about the faith to the theologians and just run argumentative non-believers through with the sword (Louis IX).
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Both are correct. If you're using the starter army you can have 6. If you're designing your own army you have to have the 8-12.
As design policy, the cheap troops in the general lists are often in large units to stop lots of little 'filler' units in an army created from those. The starter armies don't have this problem, so get more latitude as to what can be in them.
As design policy, the cheap troops in the general lists are often in large units to stop lots of little 'filler' units in an army created from those. The starter armies don't have this problem, so get more latitude as to what can be in them.
BURN THE WITCH!
See what I'm painting and playing on my wargaming blog: http://ajs-wargaming.blogspot.com/
-
BlackPrince
- Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF

- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:34 pm
One rule for the Rom Dom swarm and another for the rest of us Roman "haters"grahambriggs wrote:As design policy, the cheap troops in the general lists are often in large units to stop lots of little 'filler' units in an army created from those. The starter armies don't have this problem, so get more latitude as to what can be in them.
Maybe I should start painting some Romans????
Keith
It was better to leave disputing about the faith to the theologians and just run argumentative non-believers through with the sword (Louis IX).
It was better to leave disputing about the faith to the theologians and just run argumentative non-believers through with the sword (Louis IX).
-
grahambriggs
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E

- Posts: 3081
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
So it would seem. Funny, everyone complains about the Dom Roms in units of 4 (me included) but doesn't complain about the republican Romans in units of 4 and 2.BlackPrince wrote:One rule for the Rom Dom swarm and another for the rest of us Roman "haters"grahambriggs wrote:As design policy, the cheap troops in the general lists are often in large units to stop lots of little 'filler' units in an army created from those. The starter armies don't have this problem, so get more latitude as to what can be in them.
Maybe I should start painting some Romans????
-
philqw78
- Chief of Staff - Elite Maus

- Posts: 8842
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
- Location: Manchester
The 4's used in the proper dom swarm are faster moving and cheaper.grahambriggs wrote:So it would seem. Funny, everyone complains about the Dom Roms in units of 4 (me included) but doesn't complain about the republican Romans in units of 4 and 2.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!



