Later Horse Nomad (Mongol After 1266)

A forum for any questions relating to army design, the army companion books and upcoming lists.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28375
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

nikgaukroger wrote:
timmy1 wrote:(and a crate of whatever Hammy is drinking if the army lists for another set of rules are complete by then). :)

If you mean FoG:R that'd be beer for nothing as he isn't involved in those - therefore, please direct the beer at me :D
I suspect Hammy is still waiting to collect on his bet that he will restrain himself from buying any of the army list books for another Ancient/Medieval rules system.
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Nik

:)

If you have the FoG:R army lists ready by then you can certainly have a beer or two. I might even buy one of them.

Hammy's crate is if he wins the bet (he does not buy the DBM 4.0 Army List books within a year of them being published).

Pat

Sorry to hijack your interesting thread with such trivialities as beer and gambling.

Regards
Tim
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Dave (not the other one - my god this is confusing)

It was Pat's LHN idea that I was going to steal as they give me some options, as well as getting an army off the unused list.

Tatar may get a try out in friendlies.

Regards
Tim
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Richard - Spot on.

However I do plan to run round Britcon Benny Hill style, waving a copy of the army lists at Hammy to see if he will buy them... :)

Regards
Tim
phlewis
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:25 pm

Post by phlewis »

I would consider trying to find a way to get a TC up to an IC and or bulking up to a 12th BG.
I tried your suggestion and I think it is a case of either the IC or the 12th BG.

What I came up with was:

1 IC
2 TC
4x4 Best Equiped Cavalry Armoured Sup Drilled Bow Swordsman
7x4 Light Horse Unprotected Sup Drilled Bow Swordman
11 BGs

OR

3 TC
4x4 Best Equiped Cavalry Armoured Sup Drilled Bow Swordsman
8x4 Light Horse Unprotected Sup Drilled Bow Swordsman
12 BGs

Pat Lewis
Omaha NE[/quote]
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Can you not get some unprotected superior drilled cavalry? Saves 24pts a BG. As good as armoured if you use it for the right things.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Post by david53 »

philqw78 wrote:Can you not get some unprotected superior drilled cavalry? Saves 24pts a BG. As good as armoured if you use it for the right things.

The right thing being chasing LH around the table, but this being in one rank is a pain not as much as being hit on at 3s in two ranks. Being four bases wide they will still recieve 4 hits from 2 BGs of LH to their front, I know they are superior but....

I have used them before and IMO I would rather use the points to upgrade them but thats just my impresssion maybe other people can get them to work.... :)
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

david53 wrote:I have used them before and IMO I would rather use the points to upgrade them but thats just my impresssion maybe other people can get them to work.... :)
Perhaps you will find out on Monday?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
ethan
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1284
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:40 pm

Post by ethan »

I would downgrade some of the LH to average if you needed some points. I can see some Super LH being quite handy, but you can get away with some average. IMO it is not the shooting bonus of superior that is worth the AP, it is the impact/melee advantage against other LH.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

ethan wrote:I would downgrade some of the LH to average if you needed some points. I can see some Super LH being quite handy, but you can get away with some average. IMO it is not the shooting bonus of superior that is worth the AP, it is the impact/melee advantage against other LH.
Its that they don't die after losing 2 bases from 4 that is the biggest advantage
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Post by david53 »

philqw78 wrote:
david53 wrote:I have used them before and IMO I would rather use the points to upgrade them but thats just my impresssion maybe other people can get them to work.... :)
Perhaps you will find out on Monday?

Good look forward to it. :)
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Post by david53 »

ethan wrote:I would downgrade some of the LH to average if you needed some points. I can see some Super LH being quite handy, but you can get away with some average. IMO it is not the shooting bonus of superior that is worth the AP, it is the impact/melee advantage against other LH.

If your taking an IC I would downgrade your LH to average as they will gain +2 from your IC againist shooting and you should'nt be fighting with them till your at an advantage in combat.
Cynical
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:44 am

Post by Cynical »

phlewis wrote: 3 TC
4x4 Best Equiped Cavalry Armoured Sup Drilled Bow Swordsman
8x4 Light Horse Unprotected Sup Drilled Bow Swordsman
12 BGs
I would use this option as I think an IC is a waste when every BG is Superior.

Definitely keep the LH superior, it's more fun that way :twisted:
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Post by david53 »

Cynical wrote:
phlewis wrote: 3 TC
4x4 Best Equiped Cavalry Armoured Sup Drilled Bow Swordsman
8x4 Light Horse Unprotected Sup Drilled Bow Swordsman
12 BGs
I would use this option as I think an IC is a waste when every BG is Superior.

Definitely keep the LH superior, it's more fun that way :twisted:

Why is it more fun?
hazelbark
General - Carrier
General - Carrier
Posts: 4957
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:53 pm
Location: Capital of the World !!

Post by hazelbark »

david53 wrote:
Cynical wrote: I would use this option as I think an IC is a waste when every BG is Superior.
Definitely keep the LH superior, it's more fun that way :twisted:
Why is it more fun?
Because then you can engage in LH lottery fights of course. :roll:
phlewis
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:25 pm

Post by phlewis »

Thanks for the suggestions.

Pat Lewis
Omaha NE
lonehorseman
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: Pretoria, South Africa

Post by lonehorseman »

Correct me if I am wrong....but...
at 798 Points I manage to get

1xIC
2xTC
8x4 LH Unprot/Drilled/Sup./Bow/Swordsmen
4x4 Cv Armoured/Drilled/Sup./Bow/Swordsmen
1x Fortified Camp

Now this is just playing with point values so if in fact you cannot have something here then just chuck my theory out completely. I would take the IC just for the command range he brings and that lovely +2...but thats just me personally and I'm still a noob

Duane
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

80
70
384
304
24
=862
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
lonehorseman
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:01 pm
Location: Pretoria, South Africa

Post by lonehorseman »

hmmmf then the list generator is broken.....AGAIN :O I must be screwing it up somehow....where do I get the official one again?
15mm: Painted: Late Republican Roman
Medieval Welsh
WIP: Ivan the Terrible's Russians
Later Ottoman Turkish
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

The error must be with the superior LH. If tehy were average the answer would be 798
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Post Reply

Return to “Army Design”