Elephant proof mounted

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators

Skythian
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:50 pm

Elephant proof mounted

Post by Skythian »

We recently played a game with Ghaznavids vs mamelukes and we had some questions on "elephant proff" horses. I was unable to find where any list had them, is this a planned part of the rules or do some lists cover it?
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Please explain what you mean. The impact of elephants on horse is already greater for the opponents of the nellies...
Skythian
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Private First Class - Opel Blitz
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:50 pm

Elephant proof mounted

Post by Skythian »

In Warrior, 7th ED WRG and others, some countries/armies had elephant proof horses, i.e they were trained to either work with or fight against them, Classical Indians come readily to mind. Some countries/armies had the same for camel proofing their forces. I did not see that, though I have to admit that I have not read every list.

My question stems from "NOT FINDING" anything when looking at the Ghaznavid list and others since they have elephants as a troop type along with mounted. Are there any "elephant proof' mounted forces?
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Not that I have seen.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28320
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Elephant proof mounted

Post by rbodleyscott »

Skythian wrote:In Warrior, 7th ED WRG and others, some countries/armies had elephant proof horses, i.e they were trained to either work with or fight against them, Classical Indians come readily to mind. Some countries/armies had the same for camel proofing their forces. I did not see that, though I have to admit that I have not read every list.

My question stems from "NOT FINDING" anything when looking at the Ghaznavid list and others since they have elephants as a troop type along with mounted. Are there any "elephant proof' mounted forces?

There is no need for "elephant proofing" of friendly mounted. Provided that their battle group does not have elephants on both sides of it, only 2 bases will be in range of the elephants to be disordered. This is less than 3 so no combat dice are lost.

We were rather pleased with this simple way of making elephants have more effect on enemies than on friends, as it saved a whole lot of possibly controversial list exceptions, extra points costs or demands for "freebies" to be paid for etc etc.
peterrjohnston
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1506
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am

Post by peterrjohnston »

Unless you plan on keeping your elephants immediately behind your cavalry BGs, it doesn't matter. Say, for example, you have a BG of 4 cavalry fighting next to a BG of elephants:

CvCvElEl
CvCv

Only two bases are disordered by the elephants, so you would not lose any combat dice.
peterrjohnston
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1506
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am

Post by peterrjohnston »

Great minds post alike ;)
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

Glad you pointed that out, I have always kept my Selucid cav away from my elephants since I was afraid of losing dice. the things you learn by reading :wink:
Polkovnik
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:16 pm

Post by Polkovnik »

The friendly cavalry would have a -1 on CMTs though if they are next to the elephants. Worth remembering.
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3861
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

Why? They haven't lost to elephants?
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8836
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

They are disordered and we are talking about CMT Dave, not CT. Dont stand your lancers next to elephants, they are more likely to charge
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
peterrjohnston
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1506
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am

Post by peterrjohnston »

CMT...
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

Dont stand your lancers next to elephants, they are more likely to charge
Well, it gets them away from the big nasty grey things... :)
kdonovan
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:26 pm

Post by kdonovan »

One of the strange effects of the CMT -1 is that shock cavalry next to friendly elephants or camels are more likely to charge without orders - sort of odd, maybe they will do anything to get away from those smelly beasts. Mainly affects Hellenistic armies, Rajputs and maybe some Arabs (for lancers & camels).
Kevin
spikemesq
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:18 am

Post by spikemesq »

Taking a moment to reflect on Kevin Donovan being a "peasant" in the realm of Field of Glory.

As you were.

Spike
peterrjohnston
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1506
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am

Post by peterrjohnston »

The posts number, and hence the picture, doesn't seem to change anymore. No idea why. So now we're a caste society. :)
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

That's a shame. Reaching 1000 got me a nice new picture
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

My numbers seem to still increase, my prior post was 1067
peterrjohnston
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1506
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am

Post by peterrjohnston »

So does mine... pretty sure it was stuck on the same for days... someone asked me about it too. How odd.
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28320
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

peterrjohnston wrote:So does mine... pretty sure it was stuck on the same for days... someone asked me about it too. How odd.
All your previous posts get updated to the current post number, so if you look at two of your consecutive posts it looks as if the number hasn't changed, but it has. Spooky, eh?
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”