Another charge problem, to be sure....

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by rbodleyscott »

donkiesrus2003 wrote:Peter,
I did read the rules and the FAQ together before I posted the reply and page 58 is quite clear, and I quote
"(If the enemy who would be charged are capable of evading - see later - assume a charge move distance of 2 MUs more than the shock troops' normal move distance. This is the maximum variable move distance that could be added.)"

Please explain where I am getting confused.
The confusion/ambiguity arises from a formatting error in the printed rules. The bit in brackets was supposed to be directly attached to the preceding paragraph, and only applies to that paragraph.

The FAQ specifically clarifies this issue:
FAQ wrote:Do shock troops have to test not to charge enemy who are outside their normal charge reach but within charge reach + 2 MUs?

No. (The paragraph in brackets on P.58 only applies to situations where they may be exempt from testing).
donkiesrus2003
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:38 pm

Post by donkiesrus2003 »

Just so I understand,
Shock cavalry would not need to test if LF were 4MU away in the open but there was uneven ground 6MU away as 4 + 2 would put then in disordering terrain.
Also say the uneven ground was 2MU away (catching it at a corner) they would not be required to test either since 4 - 2 would put them in disordering terrain.
Is that what the bit in brackets is referring to?
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

Correct on both.

Sorry I was unable to explain it as well as RBS.
Pete
bawawa
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:44 pm

Post by bawawa »

lawrenceg wrote:
bawawa wrote:So my question is :

In the FAQ chapter 4/Vii what means the word "range" between bracket for the potentially revealed target :

1/Charger normal move,
2/Charger normal move plus anticipation of any further charger VDM, or
3/Charger normal move plus already rolled, so, known VDM, or
4/Charger normal move + anticipation of any charger VDM + forward step if the initial evading target in contacted ??????
5/Charger normal move + plus already rolled, so, known VDM + forward step if the initial evading target in contacted ??????

None of these options give the same thing and it's a big difference in tactic for "shoot and run" armies and their opponents.

Please Richard help us !!!!!!
Just tell me 1,2,3,4,or 5

Many thanks to all of you, guys !!!
As I understand it, it is 1, 3 and 5.

So once the original target has evaded:

IF original target outide normal move distance:
Other enemy BG within normal move distance are now a target and can evade
IF all targets in normal distance have evaded out of normal distance, roll VMD, then
Other enemy BG within normal move +VMD distance are now a target and can evade
Now you move the chargers. If they contact anything:
Other enemy BG that would be contacted by a step forward are now a target and can evade.
NB Each target can only evade once.
I do not agree cause with your option you may have evade moves after charge moves, that's not the turn sequence ! But maybe I'm wrong !
rogerg
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 855
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: Halifax, Yorkshire

Post by rogerg »

The evade move will be made before the charge move, but after the chargers roll the VMD. I agree it is an anomaly, but it works.
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

I do not agree cause with your option you may have evade moves after charge moves, that's not the turn sequence ! But maybe I'm wrong !
The way that this typically works out is:

BG A charges BG X who decides to evade.

Both roll for VMD. X moves.

The path of A's charge would bring it into contact with a new target Y. This BG now has the normal range of options, one of which may be evade. If Y decides to evade the player rolls a VMD and moves Y.

If this reveals another target repeat the process.

A then makes its charge move.
spikemesq
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:18 am

Post by spikemesq »

Some would call the BG in range of the VMD an "outlier."

The consensus is that outliers may evade, notwithstanding the RAW and the FAQ.

Spike

The devil.
bawawa
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:44 pm

Post by bawawa »

kevinj wrote:
I do not agree cause with your option you may have evade moves after charge moves, that's not the turn sequence ! But maybe I'm wrong !
The way that this typically works out is:

BG A charges BG X who decides to evade.

Both roll for VMD. X moves.

The path of A's charge would bring it into contact with a new target Y. This BG now has the normal range of options, one of which may be evade. If Y decides to evade the player rolls a VMD and moves Y.

If this reveals another target repeat the process.

A then makes its charge move.
It seems better to me, even if I think, charger don't have to roll it's VDM, before to have to move, instead, the revealed target can measure and takes its own risk, it is a big difference for the tactic.
So what I see is that nobody has the same way to understand the rule on this particular point, if Richard Bodley Scott can help us telling what is the original spirit of that rule on this point !
bawawa
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:44 pm

Post by bawawa »

spikemesq wrote:Some would call the BG in range of the VMD an "outlier."

The consensus is that outliers may evade, notwithstanding the RAW and the FAQ.

Spike

The devil.
seems logical, but what about, if the charger reached with one base the initial target, at a VDM limit, and the forward step of the other bases catch an "outlier" ??? As charges are done, you can't evade anymore !!!! so what can this outlier do ???
ShrubMiK
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 824
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:37 am

Post by ShrubMiK »

It can evade.

I think that's how most people play it? It certainly seems the sensible way to me.
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

so what can this outlier do ???
It will be apparent before moving the charger if the "outlier" will become a target of the charge. At that point the reponse option can be decided, including evade if possible, before moving the charging unit.
bawawa
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:44 pm

Post by bawawa »

kevinj wrote:
so what can this outlier do ???
It will be apparent before moving the charger if the "outlier" will become a target of the charge. At that point the reponse option can be decided, including evade if possible, before moving the charging unit.
Agree, but question remains, does the charger rolls its VDM before the outlier decision to evade ....or not ?
If we refere to full turn sequence, I suppose no....if we refere the way we currently play it (in France)....yes,

I think this point is fundamental, regard of the type of army, first case is an advantage for the shock armies, second is an advantage for the "shoot and run" armies :?:
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

bawawa wrote:
kevinj wrote:
so what can this outlier do ???
It will be apparent before moving the charger if the "outlier" will become a target of the charge. At that point the reponse option can be decided, including evade if possible, before moving the charging unit.
Agree, but question remains, does the charger rolls its VDM before the outlier decision to evade ....or not ?
If we refere to full turn sequence, I suppose no....if we refere the way we currently play it (in France)....yes,

I think this point is fundamental, regard of the type of army, first case is an advantage for the shock armies, second is an advantage for the "shoot and run" armies :?:
The outlier does not have the option to evade if the chargers VMD will not take it into contact. Until the roll of the VMD the outlier is not a charge target. Once a high VMD is rolled then the outlier becomes a target and gets to react.
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

Given the consistent assurances you've received Eric, hopefully you are more comfortable with this now?

If not, as you're in France, why not check with Gilles Wielgosz or Olivier Dader? I'm pretty sure they play it the same way we do?
Pete
donkiesrus2003
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:38 pm

Post by donkiesrus2003 »

Correct on both.

Sorry I was unable to explain it as well as RBS.
Thanks for your patience Peter.
bawawa
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Staff Sergeant - StuG IIIF
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:44 pm

Post by bawawa »

Thanks for that clarification, I have good contact with Olivier and Gilles but anyway, we were not sure of the "word of god" for this point!!!!
That's clear now !
Hope to see all of you around a Fog table
Many thanks !!!!
Eric
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”