Doubles Games

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm

Doubles Games

Post by TERRYFROMSPOKANE »

A friend and I are going to put on a FoG game at the NHMGS ENFILADE convention in May. He has painted 1,000 points of 15mm Romans and wants to use them all! Since he is going to give the whole shooting match to me after ENFILADE, I am not arguing. I see 1000 points is recommended for "15mm doubles games". My question is, aside from just allowing the players on each side to divide up the BGs between themselves, are there any special rules any of you guys use for doubles games?

Thanks, Terry G.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Never listen to Hammy, or Dave for that matter. Oh, and if your partner asks for your opinion about a move never give it as you'll get the blame when the LF get caught in the rear by the cav.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
peterrjohnston
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1506
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am

Post by peterrjohnston »

philqw78 wrote:Never listen to Hammy
So the flank march of doom was Hammy's idea then? :)
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

peterrjohnston wrote:
philqw78 wrote:Never listen to Hammy
So the flank march of doom was Hammy's idea then? :)
The flank march of doom was a radical attempt to see if we could do something other than line up with near identical armies and hope to get lucky.

We did discuss the option, the army was designed with an FC as a sub commander for that very purpose and well the rest is history.

To answe the original question you just split the BGs in whatever way you feel is amicable between the players then blame your partner for everything.
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm

Post by TERRYFROMSPOKANE »

Thanks; I think. :)

Terry G.
fgilson
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:17 pm

Blame Hammy

Post by fgilson »

Actually, having now received advice from Hammy...you can blame him when things go wrong.
kevinj
Major-General - Tiger I
Major-General - Tiger I
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Derbyshire, UK

Post by kevinj »

To answer Terry's original point doubles games do not have any special rules, just slightly larger armies. The normal practice is for each player to take responsibility for the BGs on their side of the table, if one crosses over then it's usually easier for the other player to take control.

The level of discussion and interaction within a team will vary according to the skill levels and personalities of the players concerned. It doesn't cause a problem unless one player is clearly doing nothing except slow the game down. Obviously, most teams will not have a Hammy or Dave to blame when things go wrong and will just have to deal with it themselves.
titanu
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:26 am

Post by titanu »

What you have to remember is it is not the winning or losing that is important but apportioning the blame afterwards :shock:
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

titanu wrote:What you have to remember is it is not the winning or losing that is important but apportioning the blame afterwards :shock:
I agree wholeheartedly.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Doubles Games

Post by david53 »

TERRYFROMSPOKANE wrote:A friend and I are going to put on a FoG game at the NHMGS ENFILADE convention in May. He has painted 1,000 points of 15mm Romans and wants to use them all! Since he is going to give the whole shooting match to me after ENFILADE, I am not arguing. I see 1000 points is recommended for "15mm doubles games". My question is, aside from just allowing the players on each side to divide up the BGs between themselves, are there any special rules any of you guys use for doubles games?

Thanks, Terry G.

Not really they play 900 points for doubles, I would rather it be 800 points but thats just my idea. What we do is just give each player the troops that they are confident in using. No use giving your partner all the LH if they a)dont like them b) Don't know how to use them.
azrael86
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Sergeant Major - Armoured Train
Posts: 596
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:55 pm

Re: Doubles Games

Post by azrael86 »

david53 wrote:
Not really they play 900 points for doubles, I would rather it be 800 points but thats just my idea. What we do is just give each player the troops that they are confident in using. No use giving your partner all the LH if they a)dont like them b) Don't know how to use them.
This suggest that there are people who actually LIKE LH. I ask you, is this really acceptable in polite society?
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Re: Doubles Games

Post by marioslaz »

azrael86 wrote:This suggest that there are people who actually LIKE LH. I ask you, is this really acceptable in polite society?
I love Numidian and Spanish LH in my Carthaginian army :D
Mario Vitale
david53
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Major-General - Jagdtiger
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Doubles Games

Post by david53 »

azrael86 wrote:
david53 wrote:
Not really they play 900 points for doubles, I would rather it be 800 points but thats just my idea. What we do is just give each player the troops that they are confident in using. No use giving your partner all the LH if they a)dont like them b) Don't know how to use them.
This suggest that there are people who actually LIKE LH. I ask you, is this really acceptable in polite society?


Love them Love them Love them whats not to like about a set of troops that so annoy so many people at once its much better than fielding a Dom Rom army for instent dislike. All over the tables you can here the cry my 'God Sir my Armoured Heavy foot Drilled Superior Impact foot Skillled Sword cant catch that nasty Light Horse' :wink:
mellis1644
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:40 pm

Post by mellis1644 »

titanu wrote:What you have to remember is it is not the winning or losing that is important but apportioning the blame afterwards :shock:
You know this sounds awfully like a work environment at times...Maybe I just have been working in the wrong places.

:twisted:
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”