Rear Charges & Wheels

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Rear Charges & Wheels

Post by petedalby »

A new wrinkle for me.

Page 56 - 2nd bullet - makes it clear that a flank charge can't qualify as a flank charge if it includes a wheel and starts within 1 MU from the enemy BG being charged.

Unfortunately, that paragraph doesn't state that the same restriction also applies to a rear charge.

The diagram on Page 57 includes reference to the 1 MU wheeling restriction for a BG which will be charging the rear of the enemy BG.

My opponent accepted the diagram. But which is correct?
Pete
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

The rules I believe - certainly if the two are in conflict I will go with the rules unless there is exceptional reason not to (and FWIW IIRC the same question has been asked about FoG:R which doesn't change this bit and Richard said there is no 1MU restriction for rear attacks).
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 28411
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Rear Charges & Wheels

Post by rbodleyscott »

petedalby wrote:A new wrinkle for me.

Page 56 - 2nd bullet - makes it clear that a flank charge can't qualify as a flank charge if it includes a wheel and starts within 1 MU from the enemy BG being charged.

Unfortunately, that paragraph doesn't state that the same restriction also applies to a rear charge.

The diagram on Page 57 includes reference to the 1 MU wheeling restriction for a BG which will be charging the rear of the enemy BG.

My opponent accepted the diagram. But which is correct?
The rules.

See the errata sheet.

http://www.fieldofglory.com/errata.html
Polkovnik
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:16 pm

Post by Polkovnik »

Is there a definition of a rear charge ?
ShrubMiK
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 824
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:37 am

Post by ShrubMiK »

See the index., item:

rear, charging 55-57, 57

;)

Although, to be fair, it is not specific on what exactly distinguishes a rear charge from a flank charge. I think it's fairly obvious in practice though. If you can only hit the rear or flank, it is obvious in either case. If you have the choice of manoevering to hit either rear or flank, you take your pick.
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

The diagram is corrected in the errata. Go to the Field of Glory home page and download it. It's in the "on the Field of Glory" section. It's on page 1.

http://www.fieldofglory.com/errata.html
gozerius
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Lieutenant Colonel - Fw 190A
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:32 am

Post by gozerius »

On the subject of rear charges. When conforming the rules only allow conforming to the front of an enemy base or an overlap. Does this mean that enemy bases that are not facing rearward cannot be contacted, or do such bases turn to face if contacted? If they turn, would that be limited to bases belonging to the charged BG, or include adjacent BGs which would be contacted by conforming bases?
petedalby
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3118
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Fareham, UK

Post by petedalby »

The rules.

See the errata sheet.
Thanks for such a prompt response Richard.
Pete
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”