Impact or melee POA, what do you prefer?

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply

Given the choice between the following which POA combination would you prefer?

Poll ended at Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:09 pm

Double plus at impact, even in melee
4
11%
Plus at impact, plus in melee
10
28%
Even at impact, double plus in melee
22
61%
 
Total votes: 36

hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Impact or melee POA, what do you prefer?

Post by hammy »

With the discussion on defensive spear and light spear cavalry I thought I would try a quick poll.
babyshark
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 1336
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:59 pm
Location: Government; and I'm here to help.

Post by babyshark »

I voted, but picked the middle one because I think it all depends on what use I intend for the BG in question.

Marc
Ghaznavid
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
1st Lieutenant - 15 cm sFH 18
Posts: 800
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:44 am
Location: Germany

Re: Impact or melee POA, what do you prefer?

Post by Ghaznavid »

hammy wrote:With the discussion on defensive spear and light spear cavalry I thought I would try a quick poll.
It's not that simple, it also depends if any CT modifiers are involved. Asuming none I voted for the 3rd option. If some that might change though.
Karsten


~ We are not surrounded, we are merely in a target rich environment. ~
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Re: Impact or melee POA, what do you prefer?

Post by hammy »

Ghaznavid wrote:
hammy wrote:With the discussion on defensive spear and light spear cavalry I thought I would try a quick poll.
It's not that simple, it also depends if any CT modifiers are involved. Asuming none I voted for the 3rd option. If some that might change though.
I did think of adding in CT modifiers as well and was initially going to do so but I couldn't think of a way to balance the choices.

I may do another poll along similar lines with things like + at impact and a -1 on enemy CT but at the expense of being shock troops.
lawrenceg
Colonel - Ju 88A
Colonel - Ju 88A
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: Former British Empire

Post by lawrenceg »

I voted for option 3 .

If you do lose the impact and go disrupted, the ++ in melee means you can still expect to do more hits than the opponent.

Option 2 is probably a close second place.

Exact circumstances might change things. If the opponent is already fragmented I'd go for the double plus at impact.
Lawrence Greaves
batesmotel
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by batesmotel »

In most of the games I've played, melee generally seems to be distinctly more decisive than impact. So much so that I some times wonder if FoG makes the results of the initial impact be less decisive than it should. But it maybe that's just a carry over from seeking to get or to avoid Quick Kill match ups in DBM. I voted for the third option but will agree that the plus in both is almost as good, especially if there are CT modifiers involved.

Chris
spikemesq
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:18 am

Post by spikemesq »

Voted option 3 for many of the reasons noted. Also because a player can compensate for impact POAs with formations, such as approaching with a narrow frontage and then expanding/feeding in during maneuver. Thus, you can reduce the burdens of your own poor impact factors (or the benefits of good ones for your enemy).

Spike
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Impact or melee POA, what do you prefer?

Post by philqw78 »

hammy wrote:With the discussion on defensive spear and light spear cavalry I thought I would try a quick poll.
But when this started the defensive spear were worse than evens on impact. Bases in contact were even, the bow then had 50% more dice, re-rolling all their ones, superior shooting at least twice at close range before the spear could charge and all for the same cost in points.
Not as simple a question as it looks.

The poll should have been:
Do you want

Superior Bow with pugellistic skills, but bugger all else?

Average bods with a less than average spear?

for the same points
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”