Camping Out

This forum is for any questions about the rules. Post here is you need feedback from the design team.

Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

Post Reply
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm

Camping Out

Post by TERRYFROMSPOKANE »

During my opponent's last turn, his routing BG (R) managed to outdistance my pursuing BG (P). As my turn begins, R is beside its camp and almost to it. P declares a charge and plows into R. During my JAP, R routs off the table and P's pursuit takes it into contact with the enemy camp. It appears to me that P is now looting the camp and can take a CMT to stop looting during my opponent's next turn JAP.

However, page 78 says "Troops move into contact with the enemy camp in the manoeuvre phase. This is not a charge." Since pursuits are treated as charges (p. 108), do I have to wait until my own next maneuver phase to contact the camp and then take the CMT during my own JAP?

Thanks. Terry G.
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

If a pursuit, or charging something else causes the camp to be contacted it is looted.
Last edited by philqw78 on Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Post by marioslaz »

I would say your BG P should pursue R up to table border and not change objective directing toward enemy camp. Looting enemy camp it seems to be a voluntary action (you do it with a move in manoeuvre phase) and not the result of a mandatory movement as pursuing.
Mario Vitale
deadtorius
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Field Marshal - Me 410A
Posts: 5290
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:41 am

Post by deadtorius »

I owuld agree you would have to pursue to the table edge then turn and sack the camp. the routers were your target the camp just happened to be there.
TERRYFROMSPOKANE
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:44 pm

Post by TERRYFROMSPOKANE »

Sorry for a poor explanation. BG P was partially overlapping BG R. Its direct pursuit of R caused it to contact the camp without any change in direction.

Terry G.
marioslaz
Captain - Bf 110D
Captain - Bf 110D
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:11 pm
Location: San Lazzaro (BO) Italy

Post by marioslaz »

I still would say the same. IMO you cannot become looters while you are a pursuers. Even if this can seem inconsistent (I guess the enemy camp is not fortified so you don't need a roll to sack). In my opinion, a BG pursuing need a while to realize there is a booty near; so you can:
  • contact enemy camp in JAP
  • do nothing until your next manoeuvre phase
  • follow normal procedure to loot camp
Mario Vitale
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8842
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

But a BG is a number of smaller units, sacking the camp whilst having nobody to stab in the back would seem pefectly reasonable.
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
dave_r
General - King Tiger
General - King Tiger
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by dave_r »

This has already been covered.

Pursuers will sack the camp.
ravenflight
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:52 am

Post by ravenflight »

marioslaz wrote:I would say your BG P should pursue R up to table border and not change objective directing toward enemy camp. Looting enemy camp it seems to be a voluntary action (you do it with a move in manoeuvre phase) and not the result of a mandatory movement as pursuing.
Ahh, but as happened in a recent game (I was watching, I didn't do the darstardly act or have it performed against me) the routing unit 'R' was charged in the rear, and the charge path was toward the enemy baggage, thus the persuit was toward the baggage. (actually, now that I think about it I think it was an evade, not a rout, but similar situation).
Post Reply

Return to “Rules Questions”