--- cojones...timmy1 wrote:Jer took a 40EE DBM army to the ITC, this looks similarly ballsy. Time to find out if you have cajones to match Jer's...
Smallest army in BGs
Moderators: hammy, philqw78, terrys, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
danikine74
- Corporal - 5 cm Pak 38

- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 1:48 pm
-
peterrjohnston
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1506
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am
Having been thinking about it, although it's a legal army (the Later Polish), I'm not sure it should count. Using FF and maxed-out generals seems to much of a fiddle, as Hammy says. The 5BG Navarrese or Normans seem more "correct" - I think Later Teutonic also, if I remember correctly.timmy1 wrote:Jer took a 40EE DBM army to the ITC, this looks similarly ballsy. Time to find out if you have cajones to match Jer's...
Some limiting criteria needed here?
smallest army
How about : standard array of generals (IC, 3 x TC, since this is reasonably used )
and no feild fortifications (since most of these armys are principally mounted.
fortified camp ok (pretty much fits the theme as no one will be sitting to defend it)
i can get a five with these restrictions
Ic, 3 x TC
4 x 12 HF, sup, prot, drilled, heavy waepon
1 x 10 HF sup prot, drilled, heavy weapon
pre 1422 swiss
Ben
and no feild fortifications (since most of these armys are principally mounted.
fortified camp ok (pretty much fits the theme as no one will be sitting to defend it)
i can get a five with these restrictions
Ic, 3 x TC
4 x 12 HF, sup, prot, drilled, heavy waepon
1 x 10 HF sup prot, drilled, heavy weapon
pre 1422 swiss
Ben
-
peterrjohnston
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1506
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am
-
paulcummins
- Sergeant First Class - Panzer IIIL

- Posts: 394
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:01 am
- Location: just slightly behind your flank
-
peterrjohnston
- Field of Glory Moderator

- Posts: 1506
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am



