Empires of the Dragon

General discussion forum for anything related to Field of Glory Ancients & Medieval.

Moderators: terrys, hammy, philqw78, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design

LambertSimnel
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 12:33 pm
Location: Leamington, Warks, UK

Post by LambertSimnel »

Intothevalley wrote: Does anyone know of a use for medium foot with light spear only?
1- Giving rear support to real troops
2 - Errr
3 - That's it
(You're fired - Ed)
timmy1
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Lieutenant-General - Nashorn
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:39 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, England

Post by timmy1 »

Ambush in the middle of a 16MU diameter wood?
hammy
Field of Glory Team
Field of Glory Team
Posts: 5440
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Location: Stockport
Contact:

Post by hammy »

Well the average unprotected mob light spear in my Slave Revolt army are not that shabby. Their best ever effort was breaking a BG of superior armoured heavy foot impact foot skilled swordsmen :D

OK, we were in terrain, there were only 4 of the heavy foot, I had a BG of 10 mob and a commander but after the impact the combat played out pretty much to the odds.

Not having swordsmen is a problem but is not the end of the earth. They are probably better value against spears, are definitley better value against skilled swordsmen and errr, OK even I am running out of ideas now.
Trench_Raider
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:16 pm

Post by Trench_Raider »

Does anyone know of a use for medium foot with light spear only?
Guarding the camp perhaps? (just pray that nothing more substantial than skirmishers decides on a looting spree!)
Bulking up the break point of the army by adding to the BG count? (the reason most people buy mobs for example)
Polkovnik
Major - Jagdpanther
Major - Jagdpanther
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:16 pm

Post by Polkovnik »

Intothevalley wrote: Does anyone know of a use for medium foot with light spear only?
Sit them on a steep hill and protect a flank.
grahambriggs
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
Posts: 3071
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am

Post by grahambriggs »

Intothevalley wrote:Does anyone know of a use for medium foot with light spear only? .
It will depend what else is there. They're a bad main line battle type (but you'd get a lot of them). I've found in biblical armies though that if you have tougher stuff keeping the enemies attention then a few weaker MF BGs can help on the flanks. It's a question of getting the numbers to bear. After all 8 unprotected LS only MF should beat any 4 bases of MF of equivalent morale if everyone fights.

You could also use them as a cheap sacrifice unti to dar part of the enemy line into a rash pursuit and break up their line.
Intothevalley
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 251/1
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz  251/1
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

Post by Intothevalley »

OK, I'm convinced. My next army will be early Slavic..... :wink:
khurasan_miniatures
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am

Post by khurasan_miniatures »

Now that the lists are out, I have a few questions as I eagerly await mine in the states.

What are E. Tang infantry? Are they armoured MF defensive sp with or without bw support from a rear rank? Can any be doublearmed as Bw and Sp, as they are described as being? Some Tang spearmen are shown depicted using the spear two handed -- are these in the list at all? If so are they Pikemen or offensive spear, or something else?

These questions vexed me as I was having the Tang made, so I had to make them all, nine different spearmen all together! :evil: Three poses of: men with spear shield; men with spear bow shield; men with spear two-handed.

Are E. Tang heavy cavalry lance, or lance bw*, or Bw swordsman? Can any be cataphracts?

Tibetan foot -- I assume some are armoured MF Bw, others armoured MF defensive sp?

Are Tibetan nobles lance, or lance bw*? Presume they are cataphracts.

Sorry if any of these ? are disallowed, but the book is on the way and I'm about to put these lines up for sale, so it helps to know these things! :)
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

khurasan_miniatures wrote:Now that the lists are out, I have a few questions as I eagerly await mine in the states.

What are E. Tang infantry? Are they armoured MF defensive sp with or without bw support from a rear rank? Can any be doublearmed as Bw and Sp, as they are described as being? Some Tang spearmen are shown depicted using the spear two handed -- are these in the list at all? If so are they Pikemen or offensive spear, or something else?
Early Tang fubing are 1/2 Light Spear, Swordsmen and 1/2 Bow, Swordsmen. Of course this is a game classification to try and cover the various possibilities in a reasonable manner. The figures can quite easily have the various weapons that are attributed, we just graded for the (hopefully) correct effect.

These questions vexed me as I was having the Tang made, so I had to make them all, nine different spearmen all together! :evil: Three poses of: men with spear shield; men with spear bow shield; men with spear two-handed.
All of these would be useful and usable - face it we used the same info (plus some) to create the list as you did for the figures :D

Are E. Tang heavy cavalry lance, or lance bw*, or Bw swordsman? Can any be cataphracts?
Mainly Bow, Swordsmen with a few Lancer catafracts.

The list covers the Western Wei through Early Tand and the earlier dynasties have Lnacers instead of archers BTW.

Tibetan foot -- I assume some are armoured MF Bw, others armoured MF defensive sp?
A small number of Protected bowmen and a small number of Protected/Armoured HF spearmen.

Are Tibetan nobles lance, or lance bw*? Presume they are cataphracts.
Catafract lancers.

Sorry if any of these ? are disallowed, but the book is on the way and I'm about to put these lines up for sale, so it helps to know these things! :)
No worries.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8835
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

nik and khurrasan wrote:Are Tibetan nobles lance, or lance bw*? Presume they are cataphracts.

Catafract lancers.
They have bows, but have forgotten
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
LambertSimnel
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Administrative Corporal - SdKfz 232 8Rad
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 12:33 pm
Location: Leamington, Warks, UK

Post by LambertSimnel »

khurasan_miniatures wrote:Now that the lists are out, I have a few questions as I eagerly await mine in the states.

What are E. Tang infantry? Are they armoured MF defensive sp with or without bw support from a rear rank? Can any be doublearmed as Bw and Sp, as they are described as being? Some Tang spearmen are shown depicted using the spear two handed -- are these in the list at all? If so are they Pikemen or offensive spear, or something else?

These questions vexed me as I was having the Tang made, so I had to make them all, nine different spearmen all together! :evil: Three poses of: men with spear shield; men with spear bow shield; men with spear two-handed.
mostly MF half Light Spear and Sword & half Bow and Sword
plus up to 8 bases of HF with swords or HW
khurasan_miniatures wrote: Are E. Tang heavy cavalry lance, or lance bw*, or Bw swordsman? Can any be cataphracts?
mostly Bw swordsman, with small numbers of Cataphracts, crossbow swordsman & LH bow. There are also 2 bases of elite cataphracts/ Bw swordsman/lance swordsmen available. (and if you want more LH you can have as many as three steppe allies at once)
khurasan_miniatures wrote: Tibetan foot -- I assume some are armoured MF Bw, others armoured MF defensive sp?
Surprisingly for Empires of the Dragon, the spearmen are HF! However, the archers are only protected,
khurasan_miniatures wrote: Are Tibetan nobles lance, or lance bw*? Presume they are cataphracts.
lance sword cataphracts, (who can dismount as offensive spear/)
khurasan_miniatures
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am

Post by khurasan_miniatures »

Thanks guys, yes I should have remembered that the Tibetan archers would be protected -- though they wore metal armour, they don't have shields, and IIRC that counts as protected.

Very useful! I have models to cover all of this except the HW Tang foot. I wonder what these are? I don't recall there being any large swordsmen in the T'ang period, or dagger axes on long staves, etc.

What use for the spearmen wielding the spear in two hands? Are those the HW?

Cheers
Jon
khurasan_miniatures
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am

Post by khurasan_miniatures »

nikgaukroger wrote: All of these would be useful and usable - face it we used the same info (plus some) to create the list as you did for the figures :D
Well, Duncan Head gave me the advice on the models, esp the foot. Of course, I did also have a look at the DBMM list. :wink:
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

khurasan_miniatures wrote:
What use for the spearmen wielding the spear in two hands? Are those the HW?
No reason why they cannot be used for the front rank of the infantry - Light Spear classification is, after all, just the game way of representing their effect.
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
nikgaukroger
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 10287
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: LarryWorld

Post by nikgaukroger »

khurasan_miniatures wrote:
nikgaukroger wrote: All of these would be useful and usable - face it we used the same info (plus some) to create the list as you did for the figures :D
Well, Duncan Head gave me the advice on the models, esp the foot. Of course, I did also have a look at the DBMM list. :wink:
Duncan helped with the FoG lists as well :D
Nik Gaukroger

"Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does, he will tell you.
If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith

nikgaukroger@blueyonder.co.uk
Antoshisamazing
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:47 am
Location: Heilongjiang, China

Post by Antoshisamazing »

Very useful! I have models to cover all of this except the HW Tang foot. I wonder what these are? I don't recall there being any large swordsmen in the T'ang period, or dagger axes on long staves, etc.
I think I remember reading somewhere that for a while the Tang issued dagger-axes to some crossbow armed troops as a side-arm, but they found that soldiers would often forget about their crossbows and would charge in to combat, so they stopped using them.
There was also the idea that the Tang might have had some elite untis equipped with double-handed swords as a continuation of the practice of arming the imperial guard with such weapons during the Northern dynasties.
Sorry that I can't reference these, but all my books are in Britain and I'm in China :(
philqw78
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Chief of Staff - Elite Maus
Posts: 8835
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Manchester

Post by philqw78 »

Antoshisamazing wrote:..... all my books are in Britain and I'm in China :(
Would that not be the best place to find an answer :?
phil
putting the arg into argumentative, except for the lists I check where there is no argument!
JCgoose
Corporal - Strongpoint
Corporal - Strongpoint
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:23 am
Location: Australia

Post by JCgoose »

philqw78 wrote:
Antoshisamazing wrote:..... all my books are in Britain and I'm in China :(
Would that not be the best place to find an answer :?

only if your a Party member :P
If I ever get unsure of my plan I just think to myself...DENNY CRANE!
khurasan_miniatures
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Master Sergeant - Bf 109E
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:32 am

Post by khurasan_miniatures »

nikgaukroger wrote:
khurasan_miniatures wrote:
What use for the spearmen wielding the spear in two hands? Are those the HW?
No reason why they cannot be used for the front rank of the infantry - Light Spear classification is, after all, just the game way of representing their effect.
Yes, but I already have men with spear and shield, and with spear bow and shield, for that. :)

I may suggest to people that they use them as the anti-cavalry squads -- after all, using a spear two handed instead of with a shield may have been to fend off cavalry.

Why no artillery in the Early T'ang list? (I got my book today :wink: )
marco
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
2nd Lieutenant - Panzer IVF/2
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:50 pm
Location: saint brieuc

Post by marco »

i saw a post from khurasan

i bought him some huns
receive it in one week (i'm in france !)
and the fig are great :
http://marcofwar.unblog.fr/page/2/

it's a "free" post to express that i'm happy to see a new and serious manufacturer in 15 mm
impatient to see the tang
la bretagne ça vous gagne...
...mais ça fait pas gagner !

soit on les brûle ,et on venge jeanne,
soit on les defonce à la mitraille et on venge la vielle garde.
christophe artus

http://marcofwar.unblog.fr/
http://marcofwar2.blogspot.fr/
Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion”