1- Giving rear support to real troopsIntothevalley wrote: Does anyone know of a use for medium foot with light spear only?
2 - Errr
3 - That's it
(You're fired - Ed)
Moderators: terrys, hammy, philqw78, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Moderators, Field of Glory Design
It will depend what else is there. They're a bad main line battle type (but you'd get a lot of them). I've found in biblical armies though that if you have tougher stuff keeping the enemies attention then a few weaker MF BGs can help on the flanks. It's a question of getting the numbers to bear. After all 8 unprotected LS only MF should beat any 4 bases of MF of equivalent morale if everyone fights.Intothevalley wrote:Does anyone know of a use for medium foot with light spear only? .
Early Tang fubing are 1/2 Light Spear, Swordsmen and 1/2 Bow, Swordsmen. Of course this is a game classification to try and cover the various possibilities in a reasonable manner. The figures can quite easily have the various weapons that are attributed, we just graded for the (hopefully) correct effect.khurasan_miniatures wrote:Now that the lists are out, I have a few questions as I eagerly await mine in the states.
What are E. Tang infantry? Are they armoured MF defensive sp with or without bw support from a rear rank? Can any be doublearmed as Bw and Sp, as they are described as being? Some Tang spearmen are shown depicted using the spear two handed -- are these in the list at all? If so are they Pikemen or offensive spear, or something else?
All of these would be useful and usable - face it we used the same info (plus some) to create the list as you did for the figuresThese questions vexed me as I was having the Tang made, so I had to make them all, nine different spearmen all together!Three poses of: men with spear shield; men with spear bow shield; men with spear two-handed.
Mainly Bow, Swordsmen with a few Lancer catafracts.Are E. Tang heavy cavalry lance, or lance bw*, or Bw swordsman? Can any be cataphracts?
A small number of Protected bowmen and a small number of Protected/Armoured HF spearmen.Tibetan foot -- I assume some are armoured MF Bw, others armoured MF defensive sp?
Catafract lancers.Are Tibetan nobles lance, or lance bw*? Presume they are cataphracts.
No worries.Sorry if any of these ? are disallowed, but the book is on the way and I'm about to put these lines up for sale, so it helps to know these things!
mostly MF half Light Spear and Sword & half Bow and Swordkhurasan_miniatures wrote:Now that the lists are out, I have a few questions as I eagerly await mine in the states.
What are E. Tang infantry? Are they armoured MF defensive sp with or without bw support from a rear rank? Can any be doublearmed as Bw and Sp, as they are described as being? Some Tang spearmen are shown depicted using the spear two handed -- are these in the list at all? If so are they Pikemen or offensive spear, or something else?
These questions vexed me as I was having the Tang made, so I had to make them all, nine different spearmen all together!Three poses of: men with spear shield; men with spear bow shield; men with spear two-handed.
mostly Bw swordsman, with small numbers of Cataphracts, crossbow swordsman & LH bow. There are also 2 bases of elite cataphracts/ Bw swordsman/lance swordsmen available. (and if you want more LH you can have as many as three steppe allies at once)khurasan_miniatures wrote: Are E. Tang heavy cavalry lance, or lance bw*, or Bw swordsman? Can any be cataphracts?
Surprisingly for Empires of the Dragon, the spearmen are HF! However, the archers are only protected,khurasan_miniatures wrote: Tibetan foot -- I assume some are armoured MF Bw, others armoured MF defensive sp?
lance sword cataphracts, (who can dismount as offensive spear/)khurasan_miniatures wrote: Are Tibetan nobles lance, or lance bw*? Presume they are cataphracts.
No reason why they cannot be used for the front rank of the infantry - Light Spear classification is, after all, just the game way of representing their effect.khurasan_miniatures wrote:
What use for the spearmen wielding the spear in two hands? Are those the HW?
Duncan helped with the FoG lists as wellkhurasan_miniatures wrote:Well, Duncan Head gave me the advice on the models, esp the foot. Of course, I did also have a look at the DBMM list.nikgaukroger wrote: All of these would be useful and usable - face it we used the same info (plus some) to create the list as you did for the figures
I think I remember reading somewhere that for a while the Tang issued dagger-axes to some crossbow armed troops as a side-arm, but they found that soldiers would often forget about their crossbows and would charge in to combat, so they stopped using them.Very useful! I have models to cover all of this except the HW Tang foot. I wonder what these are? I don't recall there being any large swordsmen in the T'ang period, or dagger axes on long staves, etc.
Yes, but I already have men with spear and shield, and with spear bow and shield, for that.nikgaukroger wrote:No reason why they cannot be used for the front rank of the infantry - Light Spear classification is, after all, just the game way of representing their effect.khurasan_miniatures wrote:
What use for the spearmen wielding the spear in two hands? Are those the HW?