Search found 72 matches
- Sat Nov 16, 2019 10:26 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Weather?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4389
Weather?
Hi all, Quickly perusing the new second edition rulebook, I could not find any reference/rules to weather setting apart from how the snow and rain can impact the firing and combat phases of the game. I am relatively new to FOG (but not new to Napoleonic wargaming!) and so I would have assumed there ...
- Fri Oct 25, 2019 11:20 am
- Forum: Scenarios, AAR's, Lists, Modelling and more
- Topic: Lithuanian Army Lists?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3765
Re: Lithuanian Army Lists?
Hi and thanks for all replies so far.
Unfortunately I do not have the old book and so was hoping the designers would do the work in the form of a downloadable PDF.
Unfortunately I do not have the old book and so was hoping the designers would do the work in the form of a downloadable PDF.
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:58 pm
- Forum: Scenarios, AAR's, Lists, Modelling and more
- Topic: Lithuanian Army Lists?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3765
Re: Lithuanian Army Lists?
Hi and thanks for your reply. Although I certainly welcome this rationale of just having a total of three army books (this is great!), I am not entirely sure how could the Lithuanian army list be removed from Book 3 given their regional influence in the said period and the fact that some of the fact...
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:48 am
- Forum: Scenarios, AAR's, Lists, Modelling and more
- Topic: Lithuanian Army Lists?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3765
Lithuanian Army Lists?
Hi there, I have just bought all three of the new army books for the FoG AM 3rd edition. Looking through the lists, I am a little puzzled not to see ANY Lithuanian army lists in neither Book 2 nor Book 3. Unless it is actually there and for some reason I cannot see it, I can only assume this is an o...
- Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:03 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Reference sheet errata?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3213
Re: Reference sheet errata?
Many thanks. All clear now! I think the source of this confusion is the new wording in the latest (and indeed the previous too) errata document, where on page 2 it says to add "Pivot or" before "change of formation...". I think this should be removed to be in line with your descr...
- Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:13 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Reference sheet errata?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3213
Re: Reference sheet errata?
Thanks Terry. Appreciated. However, I am still confused as to what should the correct entry be in the QRS. Could you please answer/clarify my numbered questions below? All entries refer to the Movement Phase Only table in the Simple & Complex Move section. 1. Within 2 MU of enemy --> Turn or whe...
- Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:53 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: mixed units
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1560
Re: mixed units
Great. Thank you!
- Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:13 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: mixed units
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1560
Re: mixed units
Many thanks! 
And I suppose that unit in my example would move 8MU in open (as opposed to 10MU). Correct?

And I suppose that unit in my example would move 8MU in open (as opposed to 10MU). Correct?
- Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:54 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: mixed units
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1560
mixed units
Just a quick question on mixed units please. Some army lists specify that you can (and in some cases you even must) combine two different troop types into the same unit. Now, as mentioned in the Appendix of the Triumph of Nations, these mixed units should consist of troops having the same élan and t...
- Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:09 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: army list variances
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4228
Re: army list variances
Many thanks!
- Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:09 pm
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: army list variances
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4228
army list variances
Hi all, Could you please clarify for me as to why there are certain differences between the army lists presented in the core rulebook and the other books? E.g. some numbers in the French Infantry Corps D'Armee 1812 from the rulebook do not correspond with those given in the Triumph of Nations book f...
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:09 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Reference sheet errata?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3213
Re: Reference sheet errata?
Many thanks indeed! I do appreciate your feedback and help! (Just in case it was not already clear), my annoyance was certainly not targeted at gamers or even the designers as I love the game! It's just that it is frustrating to see such inconsistencies, especially when I am a beginner in FOG:N (not...
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 12:49 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Reference sheet errata?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3213
Re: Reference sheet errata?
I understand that the Pivot was added later, HOWEVER, in that case why does the latest errata text (page 2) still say to insert the word 'Pivot or' before a 'change of formation' for the movement phase only table? Effectively, the errata text itself (in addition to the rules and tables) do not corre...
- Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:29 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Reference sheet errata?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3213
Re: Reference sheet errata?
Yes that line in the reference sheet exists under the Movement Phase Only, Within 2MU of Enemy. However, my question is about the "Pivot" line under "Over 2MU of Enemy" (not Within!). The current reference sheet (released with the latest official errata) states N/A both for Stead...
- Thu Jan 08, 2015 9:23 pm
- Forum: Modelling/Gallery/Uniforms Questions
- Topic: Skirmisher formation and attachments
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8541
Re: Skirmisher formation and attachments
Great, thank you! 

- Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:41 am
- Forum: Modelling/Gallery/Uniforms Questions
- Topic: Skirmisher formation and attachments
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8541
Re: Skirmisher formation and attachments
Thank you! So, effectively: 1. Light Cavalry that is non-Irregular can ONLY be in a Skirmisher formation when taking an Extended Line formation; and 2. Irregular Light Cavalry is always considered to be in a Skirmisher formation whether it is in tactical, extended line, march, etc. Correct? Thanks.
- Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:37 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Reference sheet errata?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3213
Re: Reference sheet errata?
Pivot is only for extended line and artillery and is meant to allow you to try and face your enemy if they are close, so not allowed unless the enemy is right up in their face. At other ranges the unit would have to wheel or prolong to change facing to the enemy. But this is not what the official e...
- Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:24 pm
- Forum: Modelling/Gallery/Uniforms Questions
- Topic: 28mm vs 15mm
- Replies: 16
- Views: 12876
Re: 28mm vs 15mm
Great, thanks. I think I will try both in 1 inch and 40mm and see which one suits me and my opponent(s) better. I do also like to have a little bit more space to manoeuvre.
- Wed Jan 07, 2015 12:30 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Reference sheet errata?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3213
Reference sheet errata?
Dear Commanders, I was just browsing through the newly updated (downloadable) reference sheets and noticed on the first page what I think is possibly an error: In the "Simple & Complex Moves" table, under the 'Movement Phase Only', the Pivot line for 'Over 2MU from enemy' states N/A fo...
- Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:08 am
- Forum: Modelling/Gallery/Uniforms Questions
- Topic: Skirmisher formation and attachments
- Replies: 16
- Views: 8541
Re: Skirmisher formation and attachments
Cavalry there is just column or normal formation and extended line formation. Light cavalry in extended line can evade. Irregular Light Cavalry in whatever formation and Regular light cavalry in extended line get to move as skirmishers (though only Irregular light cavalry can ove outside deployment...